Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 18/775,501

HIGH TEMPERATURE FIBER AND METHOD OF MAKING

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jul 17, 2024
Priority
Aug 09, 2019 — divisional of 12/071,378
Examiner
FIGUEROA, JOHN J
Art Unit
1763
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
RTX Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
931 granted / 1118 resolved
+18.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
1141
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
42.5%
+2.5% vs TC avg
§102
34.2%
-5.8% vs TC avg
§112
9.9%
-30.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1118 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Applicant’s claim of priority of this application as a 35 U.S.C. §120 divisional of U.S. Serial No. 16/536,742, filed Aug. 9, 2019 (now U.S. Patent 12,071,378 B2), is hereby acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. §102(a)(1) as anticipated by Rice (USPN 4,642,271 to Rice et al., issued Feb. 10, 1987). Rice discloses fabricating a ceramic fiber composite comprising ceramic fibers coated with boron nitride (boron atom bonded to nitrogen atom) (“peripheral composition”), wherein the boron nitride coating is embedded in a ceramic matrix (“core composition), wherein the boron nitride coating maintains high coherence to the fibers thereby limiting bonding and chemical reactions between fibers and the ceramic matrix, and wherein the boron nitride coating remains stable at high temperatures higher than the coatings’ melting point so that superior strength and toughness characteristics are retained in high temperature process/environments (abstract; col. 1, line 50 to col. 2, line 6; Figs. 2-4 of Rice, present claims 1, 2, 5, 6, 8, 9 and 11-13). Rice further discloses that a wide variety of ceramic matrix compositions can be used, such as, inter alia, silicon carbide (SiC), aluminum oxide (alumina), zirconium oxide (zirconia) and zirconium titanate (zirconium and titanium are “refractory metals”), wherein the examples contain one of three types of fiber silicon carbide, alumina or zirconia (col. 2, line 52 to col. 3, line 15; col. 3, lines 20-47; Figs. 3-6 of Rice (present claims 2-7, 10-12 and 14). Rice also discloses preparing composites with alumina-based fibers that demonstrate the advantage of using the fiber coatings to provide enhanced strength and significantly increased toughness as evidenced by the increased area under the load deflection characteristics curves of a composite in Fig. 4 (col. 4, line 56 to col. 5, line 35, Table I, Fig. 4; claims 1 and 7-9 of Rice). For example, Curve 22 in FIG. 4 shows the enhanced load-deflection characteristics of a composite with boron nitride (BN) coated aluminum oxide (alumina) based fibers in a SiC matrix. Thus, the instant claims are anticipated by Rice. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOHN J FIGUEROA whose telephone number is (571)272-8916. The examiner can normally be reached on 8:30 am -6:00 pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JOSEPH DEL SOLE can be reached on 571-272-1130. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOHN J FIGUEROA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1763 August 8, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 17, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12766808
COMPOSITE ABSORBENT BODY AND POLYMERIC ABSORBER
3y 3m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12759869
METHOD FOR INTEGRATING AMMONIA CRACKING IN A STEAM METHANE REFORMER
3y 6m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12759873
PROCESS AND PLANT FOR PROVIDING SYNTHESIS GAS AND FOR PRODUCING METHANOL
3y 2m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12759892
METHOD FOR PREPARING TIN OXIDE NANOPARTICLES DISPERSED IN ALCOHOL SOLVENT, AND USE THEREOF
2y 8m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12758955
PARTICLE FILTER FOR EXHAUST GAS OF GASOLINE ENGINES
3y 1m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+8.7%)
2y 10m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1118 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month