Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/776,534

LIGHT IRRADIATING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 18, 2024
Priority
Jul 21, 2023 — JP 2023-118894
Examiner
SMYTH, ANDREW P
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Hoya Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
621 granted / 863 resolved
+12.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
874
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
90.2%
+50.2% vs TC avg
§102
7.3%
-32.7% vs TC avg
§112
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 863 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 3-4 and 7-8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by TAKUBO (US 20210323322 A1). Regarding claim 1, TAKUBO discloses a light irradiating apparatus (fig. 1) comprising: a light source module (4) which includes a board (5) and a light-emitting element (LED 4) [0021] mounted on a first surface of the board; a heat sink (6) which is provided in contact with a second surface of the board (5); a circuit board or circuit wiring (associated with LED 4) [0024] which is electrically connected to the light source module (4); and a housing (9) which has a first space which houses the heat sink (6) and a second space which houses the circuit board or circuit wiring (associated with LED 4) [0024] , wherein the housing (9) is provided with a first opening (11, 12) which connects the first space (containing 6) and an outside of the housing, a second opening (10) which connects the second space (containing 4) and the outside of the housing, and a third opening (on inside left of 9, connecting spaces containing 4 and 6) which connects the first space and the second space (fig. 1, led 4, heat sink 6, openings 11, 10, filter 12) (abstract) [0003] [0016-0018] [0021] [0024]. Regarding claim 3, TAKUBO discloses that the heat sink (6) is disposed between the first opening (11, 12) and the third opening (on inside left of 9, connecting spaces containing 4 and 6) . Regarding claim 4, TAKUBO discloses that the circuit board or circuit wiring (associated with LED 4) [0024] is disposed between the second opening (10) and the third opening (on inside left of 9, connecting spaces containing 4 and 6) . Regarding claim 7, TAKUBO discloses that the circuit board or circuit wiring (associated with LED 4) [0024] is a member which supplies electric power [0024] to the light source module (4) or controls the light source module (4) [0024]. Regarding claim 8, TAKUBO discloses that the light-emitting element (4) emits light of a wavelength which acts on an ultraviolet curable resin [0021]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 2. Claim(s) 2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over TAKUBO (US 20210323322 A1) in view of LI (DE 102016112122 B4). Regarding claim 2, TAKUBO discloses wherein the housing (9) has a partition wall (8, extending from 8 and/or 5) which separates the first space (containing 6) and the second space (containing 4), and the third opening (on inside left of 9, connecting spaces containing 4 and 6) is provided But TAKUBO fails to disclose the third opening is provided in the partition wall. LI, however, discloses a housing (fig. 7; 2) for LED lights (1), cooling device (11), and having separate partitioned spaces for the LED (1) and cooling device (11), wherein the housing (2) has a partition wall (bottom wall 21, between spaces exposed to/containing 1 and 11) which separates a first space (containing 11) and a second space (containing LEDs 1), and that a third opening (213, 214) is provided in the partition wall (21). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA applications) to combine/modify the invention of TAKUBO, with a third opening is provided in the partition wall, as taught by LI, to use for further partitioning and controlling gas suction-flow between the LED space and cooling device space (abstract). 2. Claim(s) 5-6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over TAKUBO (US 20210323322 A1) in view of KOGURE (JP 2018043522 A). Regarding claim 5, TAKUBO discloses a But TAKUBO fails to disclose a dry air generator which generates dry air by reducing an amount of moisture in an inputted air and supplies the dry air. KOGURE , however, discloses a light source (100, 110) , a heat sink (150) and a dry air generator (condenser 200) which generates dry air by reducing an amount of moisture in an inputted air and supplies the dry air (pg. 6-7). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA applications) to combine/modify the invention of TAKUBO, with a dry air generator which generates dry air by reducing an amount of moisture in an inputted air and supplies the dry air, as taught by KOGURE, to use for removing moisture from the air to prevent internal water condensation thereby ensuring proper equipment operation (pg. 6-7). Regarding claim 6, TAKUBO, discloses But TAKUBO fails to disclose wherein a flow passage through which a refrigerant selected from water, or ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, or a mixture thereof with water flows is provided in the heat sink. KOGURE , however, discloses an LED light (fig. 3, 110) , a heat sink (150) and a flow passage (160) through which a refrigerant selected from water, is provided in the heat sink (pgs. 1-2 and 4). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA applications) to combine/modify the invention of TAKUBO, with a water cooled heat sink, as taught by KOGURE , to use as a substitution of one known heat sink (i.e. water cooled) for another to obtain predictable temperature control results (pgs. 1-2 and 4). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Andrew Smyth whose telephone number is 571-270-1746. The examiner can normally be reached between 9:00AM - 6:00PM; Monday thru Friday. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Georgia Epps can be reached on (571) 272-2328. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANDREW SMYTH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2878
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 18, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12680991
WAVEFORM-ANALYZING METHOD, WAVEFORM-ANALYZING DEVICE AND ANALYZING SYSTEM
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673219
PATIENT-SPECIFIC IMMOBILIZATION STRUCTURE AND SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FABRICATION THEREOF
4y 4m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12669440
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR SENSING RF SIGNALS FROM RF PLASMA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT
4y 6m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12667635
ACTIVE OXYGEN SUPPLY APPARATUS
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12665181
Ionizer
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+14.9%)
2y 10m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 863 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month