Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/777,919

Handheld Controller with Contact Zone for Constraining Mobile Devices of Differing Sizes

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jul 19, 2024
Priority
Aug 01, 2023 — provisional 63/530,230
Examiner
BLAISE, MALINA D
Art Unit
3715
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Backbone Labs Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
58%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 58% of resolved cases
58%
Career Allowance Rate
381 granted / 663 resolved
-12.5% vs TC avg
Strong +39% interview lift
Without
With
+38.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
696
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
23.8%
-16.2% vs TC avg
§103
44.0%
+4.0% vs TC avg
§102
15.2%
-24.8% vs TC avg
§112
8.8%
-31.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 663 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Applicant’s response filed 8/17/26 elected Species I, claims 1-7 for examination. Claims 1-7 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US Publication No. 2022/0032180 A1 to Khaira et al. (hereinafter “Khaira”). Concerning claim 1, Khaira discloses a gaming system, comprising: a handheld controller with a first handle and a second handle; a bridge connecting the first handle and the second handle, the bridge defining an x-y plane (Abstract, Figs. 1 and 18, elements 101, 102, 119, and 199); and a contact zone on at least one of the first handle and the second handle, the contact zone configured to align and constrain a mobile device in a desired gameplay position that is substantially parallel to the x-y plane and between the first handle and the second handle, the contact zone having a cross-sectional profile in an x-z plane, the x-z plane being perpendicular to the x-y plane, the cross-sectional profile of the contact zone comprising an arcuate section and a chamfered section, the arcuate section having a radius and a center of curvature that is between the first handle and the second handle, the chamfered section comprising two substantially flat segments meeting at an obtuse angle, at least one of the two substantially flat segments having a length that is not less than one-quarter of the radius of the arcuate section (Figs. 19-21, elements 106, 145, 156, 155, paragraph [0112] – the contact zone on handles has both chamfered and arcuate sections and having a radius and a center of curvature that is between the first handle and the second handle). Concerning claim 2, Khaira discloses in which the chamfered section further comprises a third substantially flat segment that meets at least one of the two substantially flat segments at an obtuse angle (Figs. 19-21, elements 106, 145, 156, 155, paragraph [0112]). Concerning claim 3, Khaira discloses in which the contact zone on at least one of the first handle and the second handle is a first contact zone on the first handle and a second contact zone on the second handle (Figs. 19-21, elements 106, 145, 156, 155, paragraph [0112]). Concerning claim 4, Khaira discloses in which the chamfered section is a first chamfered section, and in which the cross-sectional profile of the contact zone further comprises a second chamfered section, the arcuate section being between the first chamfered section and the second chamfered section in the cross-sectional profile of the contact zone (Figs. 19-21, elements 106, 145, 156, 155, paragraph [0112]). Concerning claim 5, Khaira discloses in which the bridge is in sliding engagement with the first handle and the second handle, the bridge having a span extending away from the first handle, the span having a transverse midline, the midline of the bridge being between the first handle and the second handle, the bridge and the first handle being configured for the first handle to translate in a retraction direction toward the midline of the bridge and into a retracted configuration and also to translate in an extension direction away from the midline of the bridge into an extended configuration, the bridge and the second handle being configured for the second handle to translate along the bridge in the retraction direction toward the midline of the bridge and into the retracted configuration and also to translate in the extension direction away from the midline of the bridge and into the extended configuration (Abstract, Figs. 1 and 18, elements 101, 102, 119, and 199; Figs. 19-21, elements 106, 145, 156, 155, paragraph [0112]). Concerning claim 6, Khaira discloses in which the contact zone is configured to align and constrain the mobile device in the desired gameplay position in the retracted configuration (Abstract, Figs. 1 and 18, elements 101, 102, 119, and 199). Concerning claim 7, Khaira discloses further comprising a mobile device constrained between the first handle and the second handle in the desired gameplay position, the mobile device contacting the contact zone and being constrained to the desired gameplay position by the contact zone (Abstract, Figs. 1 and 18, elements 101, 102, 119, and 199). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure is listed in the PTO-892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MALINA D BLAISE whose telephone number is (571)270-3398. The examiner can normally be reached Mon. - Thurs. 7:00 am - 5:00 pm (PT). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Xuan Thai can be reached at 571-272-7147. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. MALINA D. BLAISE Primary Examiner Art Unit 3715 /MALINA D. BLAISE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 19, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746464
INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS AND IMAGE GENERATING METHOD
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12746478
RESOURCE PRELOADING METHOD AND APPARATUS, STORAGE MEDIUM, AND COMPUTER DEVICE
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12728352
NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12725489
GAMING SYSTEM AND METHOD WITH SYMBOL CLUSTER FEATURE
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12702920
BOUNDARY DISPLAY CONTROL DEVICE, BOUNDARY DISPLAY CONTROL METHOD, AND PROGRAM
4y 10m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
58%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+38.8%)
3y 1m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 663 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month