Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/778,460

METHOD FOR FABRICATING MASK, METHOD FOR FABRICATING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE USING THE MASK, AND THE SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE FABRICATED USING THE MASK

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Jul 19, 2024
Priority
Mar 16, 2021 — RE `10-2021-0033976 +1 more
Examiner
KIM, TONG-HO
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
95%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 95% — above average
95%
Career Allowance Rate
1040 granted / 1092 resolved
+35.2% vs TC avg
Minimal +1% lift
Without
With
+0.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 8m
Avg Prosecution
53 currently pending
Career history
1103
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
46.2%
+6.2% vs TC avg
§102
30.9%
-9.1% vs TC avg
§112
8.7%
-31.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1092 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 7/19/2024, 2/10/2025 was filed. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1-9 and 11-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-9 and 11-20 of U.S. Patent No. 12,068,327 in view of Kim (US 2019/0386099). Regarding claim 1, Pat '327 discloses, in claim 1, a semiconductor device comprising: a substrate including a first region, a second region, and a connecting region placed between the first region and the second region; a plurality of first multi-channel active patterns placed in the first region of the substrate; a plurality of second multi-channel active patterns placed in the second region of the substrate; a first connecting fin type pattern which is placed in the connecting region of the substrate and extends from the first region to the second region in a first direction; a field insulating film which is placed on the substrate and covers an upper surface of the first connecting fin type pattern; and, wherein a width of the first connecting fin type pattern in the second direction decreases and then increases as it goes away from the first region (all limitations are the same with the limitations recited in claim 1 of Pat '327). Pat '327 does not explicitly disclose a first edge gate electrode which is placed along a boundary between the first region and the connecting region on the field insulating film and extends in a second direction perpendicular to the first direction; a second edge gate electrode which is placed along a boundary between the second region and the connecting region on the field insulating film and extends in the second direction. Kim teaches, in at least figures 1-2 and related text, the device comprising a first edge gate electrode (130 of 120, [42], [57]) which is placed along a boundary between the first region and the connecting region on the field insulating film (105, [51]) and extends in a second direction (y direction, figures) perpendicular to the first direction (x direction, figures); a second edge gate electrode (230 of 220, [42], [57]) which is placed along a boundary between the second region and the connecting region on the field insulating film (105, [51]) and extends in the second direction (y direction, figures), for the purpose of providing a semiconductor device with increased element integration density and improved reliability and performance ([5]). Pat '327 and Kim are analogous art because they are directed to semiconductor device and one of ordinary skill in the art would have had a reasonable expectation of success to modify Pat '327 with the specified features of Kim because they are from the same field of endeavor. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the structure disclosed in Pat '327 to have the first edge gate electrode which is placed along a boundary between the first region and the connecting region on the field insulating film and extends in a second direction perpendicular to the first direction; the second edge gate electrode which is placed along a boundary between the second region and the connecting region on the field insulating film and extends in the second direction, as taught by Kim, for the purpose of providing a semiconductor device with increased element integration density and improved reliability and performance ([5], Kim). Regarding claim 2, Pat '327 discloses the semiconductor device of claim 1 as described above. Pat '327 further discloses, in claim 2, the first connecting fin type pattern includes a bridge portion, and a first branch portion and a second branch portion protruding from the bridge portion toward the first region, and the first branch portion and the second branch portion are spaced apart from each other in the second direction (all limitations are the same with the limitations recited in claim 2 of Pat '327). Regarding claim 3, Pat '327 discloses the semiconductor device of claim 2 as described above. Pat '327 further discloses, in claim 3, the first connecting fin type pattern includes a third branch portion and a fourth branch portion protruding from the bridge portion toward the second region, and the third branch portion and the fourth branch portion are spaced apart from each other in the second direction (all limitations are the same with the limitations recited in claim 3 of Pat '327). Regarding claim 4, Pat '327 discloses the semiconductor device of claim 2 as described above. Pat '327 further discloses, in claim 4, the bridge portion extends to the second region (all limitations are the same with the limitations recited in claim 4 of Pat '327). Regarding claim 5, Pat '327 discloses the semiconductor device of claim 1 as described above. Pat '327 further discloses, in claim 5, the first connecting fin type pattern is directly connected to two of the first multi-channel active patterns and two of the second multi-channel active patterns (all limitations are the same with the limitations recited in claim 5 of Pat '327). Regarding claim 6, Pat '327 discloses the semiconductor device of claim 1 as described above. Pat '327 further discloses, in claim 6, the first connecting fin type pattern is directly connected to one of the first multi-channel active patterns and two of the second multi-channel active patterns (all limitations are the same with the limitations recited in claim 6 of Pat '327). Regarding claim 7, Pat '327 discloses the semiconductor device of claim 1 as described above. Pat '327 further discloses, in claim 7, the first connecting fin type pattern is directly connected to one of the first multi-channel active patterns and one of the second multi-channel active patterns (all limitations are the same with the limitations recited in claim 7 of Pat '327). Regarding claim 8, Pat '327 discloses the semiconductor device of claim 1 as described above. Pat '327 further discloses, in claim 8, a second connecting fin type pattern placed in the connecting region of the substrate, wherein an upper surface of the second connecting fin type pattern has a half ring shape (all limitations are the same with the limitations recited in claim 8 of Pat '327). Regarding claim 9, Pat '327 discloses the semiconductor device of claim 1 as described above. Pat '327 further discloses, in claim 9, a second connecting fin type pattern placed in the connecting region of the substrate, wherein an upper surface of the second connecting fin type pattern has a half ring shape (all limitations are the same with the limitations recited in claim 9 of Pat '327). Regarding claim 11, Pat '327 discloses the semiconductor device of claim 1 as described above. Pat '327 further discloses, in claim 11, at least one of the first multi-channel active pattern and the second multi-channel active pattern includes a lower fin type pattern, and a sheet pattern on the lower fin type pattern (all limitations are the same with the limitations recited in claim 11 of Pat '327). Regarding claim 12, Pat '327 discloses, in claim 12, a semiconductor device comprising: a substrate including a first region, a second region, and a connecting region placed between the first region and the second region; a plurality of first multi-channel active patterns placed in the first region of the substrate; a plurality of second multi-channel active patterns placed in the second region of the substrate; a first connecting fin type pattern which is placed in the connecting region of the substrate and extends from the first region to the second region in a first direction; a field insulating film which is placed on the substrate and covers an upper surface of the first connecting fin type pattern; and, wherein the first connecting fin type pattern includes a bridge portion, and a first branch portion and a second branch portion protruding from the bridge portion toward the first region, and the first branch portion and the second branch portion are spaced apart from each other in the second direction (all limitations are the same with the limitations recited in claim 12 of Pat '327). Pat '327 does not explicitly disclose a first edge gate electrode which is placed along a boundary between the first region and the connecting region on the field insulating film and extends in a second direction perpendicular to the first direction; a second edge gate electrode which is placed along a boundary between the second region and the connecting region on the field insulating film and extends in the second direction. Kim teaches, in at least figures 1-2 and related text, the device comprising a first edge gate electrode (130 of 120, [42], [57]) which is placed along a boundary between the first region and the connecting region on the field insulating film (105, [51]) and extends in a second direction (y direction, figures) perpendicular to the first direction (x direction, figures); a second edge gate electrode (230 of 220, [42], [57]) which is placed along a boundary between the second region and the connecting region on the field insulating film (105, [51]) and extends in the second direction (y direction, figures), for the purpose of providing a semiconductor device with increased element integration density and improved reliability and performance ([5]). Pat '327 and Kim are analogous art because they are directed to semiconductor device and one of ordinary skill in the art would have had a reasonable expectation of success to modify Pat '327 with the specified features of Kim because they are from the same field of endeavor. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the structure disclosed in Pat '327 to have the first edge gate electrode which is placed along a boundary between the first region and the connecting region on the field insulating film and extends in a second direction perpendicular to the first direction; the second edge gate electrode which is placed along a boundary between the second region and the connecting region on the field insulating film and extends in the second direction, as taught by Kim, for the purpose of providing a semiconductor device with increased element integration density and improved reliability and performance ([5], Kim). Regarding claim 13, Pat '327 discloses the semiconductor device of claim 12 as described above. Pat '327 further discloses, in claim 13, the bridge portion extends to the second region, and a width of the bridge portion in the second direction decreases and then increases, as it goes away from the first branch portion and the second branch portion (all limitations are the same with the limitations recited in claim 13 of Pat '327). Regarding claim 14, Pat '327 discloses the semiconductor device of claim 13 as described above. Pat '327 further discloses, in claim 14, the bridge portion is directly connected to two or less of the second multi-channel active patterns (all limitations are the same with the limitations recited in claim 14 of Pat '327). Regarding claim 15, Pat '327 discloses the semiconductor device of claim 12 as described above. Pat '327 further discloses, in claim 15, the first connecting fin type pattern includes a third branch portion and a fourth branch portion protruding from the bridge portion toward the second region, and the third branch portion and the fourth branch portion are spaced apart from each other in the second direction (all limitations are the same with the limitations recited in claim 15 of Pat '327). Regarding claim 16, Pat '327 discloses the semiconductor device of claim 15 as described above. Pat '327 further discloses, in claim 16, one or both of the third branch portion and the fourth branch portion are directly connected to the second multi-channel active patterns (all limitations are the same with the limitations recited in claim 16 of Pat '327). Regarding claim 17, Pat '327 discloses the semiconductor device of claim 12 as described above. Pat '327 further discloses, in claim 17, one or both of the first branch portion and the second branch portion are directly connected to the first multi-channel active patterns (all limitations are the same with the limitations recited in claim 17 of Pat '327). Regarding claim 18, Pat '327 discloses, in claim 18, a semiconductor device comprising: a substrate including a first region, a second region, and a connecting region placed between the first region and the second region; a plurality of first multi-channel active patterns placed in the first region of the substrate; a plurality of second multi-channel active patterns placed in the second region of the substrate; a first connecting fin type pattern which is placed in the connecting region of the substrate and extends from the first region to the second region in a first direction; a second connecting fin type pattern which is placed in the connecting region of the substrate and has a half ring-shaped upper surface; a third connecting fin type pattern which is placed between the first connecting fin type pattern and the second connecting fin type pattern, and extends in the first direction along a profile of an outer side wall of the first connecting fin type pattern; a field insulating film which is placed on the substrate and covers an upper surface of the first connecting fin type pattern, an upper surface of the second connecting fin type pattern, and an upper surface of the third connecting fin type pattern; a first gate electrode which extends in a second direction perpendicular to the first direction, on the first multi-channel active patterns; a second gate electrode which extends in the second direction, on the second multi-channel active patterns; and, wherein a width of the first connecting fin type pattern in the second direction decreases and then increases, as it goes away from the first region (all limitations are the same with the limitations recited in claim 18 of Pat '327). Pat '327 does not explicitly disclose a first edge gate electrode which is placed along a boundary between the first region and the connecting region on the field insulating film and is spaced apart from the first gate electrode in the first direction; a second edge gate electrode which is placed along a boundary between the second region and the connecting region on the field insulating film and is spaced apart from the second gate electrode in the first direction; a first source/drain pattern placed between the first gate electrode and the first edge gate electrode; a second source/drain pattern placed between the second gate electrode and the second edge gate electrode. Kim teaches, in at least figures 1-2 and related text, the device comprising a first edge gate electrode (130 of 120, [42], [57]) which is placed along a boundary between the first region and the connecting region on the field insulating film (105, [51]) and is spaced apart from the first gate electrode (330 of 320, [42], [57]) in the first direction (x direction, figures); a second edge gate electrode (230 of 220, [42], [57]) which is placed along a boundary between the second region and the connecting region on the field insulating film (105, [51]) and is spaced apart from the second gate electrode (430 of 420, [42], [57]) in the first direction (x direction, figures); a first source/drain pattern (150, [66]) placed between the first gate electrode (330 of 320, [42], [57]) and the first edge gate electrode (130 of 120, [42], [57]); a second source/drain pattern (250, [66]) placed between the second gate electrode (430 of 420, [42], [57]) and the second edge gate electrode (230 of 220, [42], [57]), for the purpose of providing a semiconductor device with increased element integration density and improved reliability and performance ([5]). Pat '327 and Kim are analogous art because they are directed to semiconductor device and one of ordinary skill in the art would have had a reasonable expectation of success to modify Pat '327 with the specified features of Kim because they are from the same field of endeavor. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the structure disclosed in Pat '327 to have the first edge gate electrode which is placed along a boundary between the first region and the connecting region on the field insulating film and is spaced apart from the first gate electrode in the first direction; the second edge gate electrode which is placed along a boundary between the second region and the connecting region on the field insulating film and is spaced apart from the second gate electrode in the first direction; the first source/drain pattern placed between the first gate electrode and the first edge gate electrode; the second source/drain pattern placed between the second gate electrode and the second edge gate electrode, as taught by Kim, for the purpose of providing a semiconductor device with increased element integration density and improved reliability and performance ([5], Kim). Regarding claim 19, Pat '327 discloses the semiconductor device of claim 18 as described above. Pat '327 further discloses, in claim 19, the upper surface of the first connecting fin type pattern has a Y shape (all limitations are the same with the limitations recited in claim 19 of Pat '327). Regarding claim 20, Pat '327 discloses the semiconductor device of claim 18 as described above. Pat '327 further discloses, in claim 20, the upper surface of the first connecting fin type pattern has an X shape (all limitations are the same with the limitations recited in claim 20 of Pat '327). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 10 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims because the prior art of record neither anticipates nor render obvious the limitations of the base claims 1 and 10 that recite "the first edge gate electrode wraps around an end of the first multi-channel active patterns, and the second edge gate electrode wraps around an end of the second multi-channel active patterns" in combination with other elements of the base claims 1 and 10. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TONG-HO KIM whose telephone number is (571)270-0276. The examiner can normally be reached Monday thru Friday; 8:30 AM to 5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lynne Gurley can be reached at 571-272-1670. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TONG-HO KIM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2811
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 19, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12751274
SEMICONDUCTOR INTEGRATED CIRCUIT DEVICE
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745454
SINGLE METAL GATE WITH DUAL EFFECTIVE WORK FUNCTION GATE METAL SCHEME
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12745666
PACKAGE STRUCTURES, FABRICATING METHODS THEREOF, AND MEMORY SYSTEMS
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12740338
RESISTIVE RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY DEVICE AND FABRICATION METHOD THEREOF
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12740474
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD OF THE SAME
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
95%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+0.7%)
1y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1092 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month