Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/780,711

ACCESSORY

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 23, 2024
Priority
Aug 16, 2018 — JP 2018-153307 +3 more
Examiner
DAGNEW, MEKONNEN D
Art Unit
2638
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Nikon Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
614 granted / 738 resolved
+21.2% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
760
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
89.9%
+49.9% vs TC avg
§102
7.1%
-32.9% vs TC avg
§112
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 738 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tamura et al. (US 20180348597 A1; hereafter Tamura) in view of Izukawa (US 20050128342 A1). As of Claim 1: Tamura teaches an accessory removably attachable to a camera body (¶0034 and FIG. 1A and an interchangeable lens assembly (an optical apparatus, an accessory, a lens apparatus) 100 that is a camera accessory, and a camera body (an image pickup apparatus) 10 on which the interchangeable lens assembly 100 is detachably mounted) that has a terminal that outputs a C clock signal (¶0045 and note that The LCLK terminals are terminals for communication clock signals output from the camera body 10 to the interchangeable lens assembly 100 and interpreted as C clock signals), the accessory comprising: a ready terminal used to indicate whether or not communication with the camera body is allowed (¶0046 and note that the CS terminals are terminals for a communication request signal between the camera body 10 and the interchangeable lens assembly 100, and are open interfaces. The request is to check whether or not communication with the camera body is allowed and thereby confirming readiness to communicate); and a second data terminal that outputs a second data signal to the camera body, wherein: a first communication is performed by using the ready terminal, the first data terminal and the second data terminal, and the accessory performs the first communication without receiving the C clock signal from the camera body (¶¶0043,0044,0045, 0092 and note that the communication terminals further include a terminal unit (the CS, and DCA terminals) that is a third communication unit that performs the third communication independent of the first and second communications. The camera control unit 18 and the lens control unit 103 are capable of performing the first, second, and third communications that are independent of each other through the above communication terminals. Since it is independent, it does not need to receive the C clock signal). Izukawa is a similar or analogous system to the claimed invention as evidenced Izukawa teaches a lens apparatus attached to the image taking apparatus described above. The lens apparatus comprises a lens; a memory which stores information on the image size of the lens apparatus; and a communicating unit which transmits the information on the image size to the image taking apparatus that would have prompted a predictable variation of Tamura by applying Izukawa’s known principal of a first data terminal that receives a first data signal that is output synchronized with the C clock signal, from the camera body (¶¶0031,0048, and note that CK denotes a clock input terminal to synchronize communications between the camera control CPU 31 of the camera body side and lens control CPU 11 of the lens apparatus side. Also DO denotes a data output terminal to transmit data of the lens apparatus side to the camera body side, and Reference Symbol DI denotes a data input terminal into which data and a command from the camera body side are inputted). In view of the motivations such as improving data exchange in real time timed by the clock which keeps focusing, stabilization coordinated and thereby improving image quality one of ordinary skill in the art would have implemented the claimed variation of the prior art system of Tamura. Therefore, the claimed invention would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MEKONNEN D DAGNEW whose telephone number is (571)270-5092. The examiner can normally be reached on 8:00AM-5:00PM M-Th. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lin Ye can be reached on 571-272-7372. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see https://ppair-my.uspto.gov/pair/PrivatePair. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MEKONNEN D DAGNEW/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2638
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 23, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12627895
EXPOSURE COMPENSATION METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 3m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12627781
IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS AND IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD
1y 9m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12615447
IMAGING ELEMENT AND IMAGING DEVICE
1y 7m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12593143
SOLID-STATE IMAGING DEVICE
1y 8m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586142
IMAGE CAPTURING METHOD AND DISPLAY METHOD FOR RECOGNIZING A RELATIONSHIP AMONG A PLURALITY OF IMAGES DISPLAYED ON A DISPLAY SCREEN
1y 8m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+15.5%)
2y 6m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 738 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month