Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 16, 2026
Application No. 18/782,893

LIGHT DETECTION DEVICE AND LIGHT DETECTION SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jul 24, 2024
Priority
Sep 28, 2018 — JP 2018-185429 +2 more
Examiner
CHAMBLISS, ALONZO
Art Unit
2897
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Canon Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
66%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
1089 granted / 1209 resolved
+22.1% vs TC avg
Minimal -24% lift
Without
With
+-24.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
1234
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
§103
35.9%
-4.1% vs TC avg
§102
31.8%
-8.2% vs TC avg
§112
15.1%
-24.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1209 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 7/24/2024 was filed before the mailing date of the Non-final rejection on 8/14/2026. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being clearly anticipated by Morimoto et al. (US 2018/0108800). With respect to Claim 1, Morimoto teaches a semiconductor substrate 15 including a first surface and a pixel region in which a plurality of pixels each including an avalanche diode is arranged on the semiconductor substrate. The avalanche diode includes in cross sectional view a first semiconductor region 71 of a first conductivity type disposed at a first depth. A second semiconductor region 74 of a second conductivity type disposed at a second depth deeper than the first depth with respect to the first surface. An avalanche multiplication region being formed between the first semiconductor region and the second semiconductor region. A third semiconductor region 75 of the first conductivity type disposed at a third depth deeper than the second depth with respect to the first surface and in contact with the second semiconductor region 74. A first separation region 16 and a second separation region 16 each extending from the first depth to the third depth. The second semiconductor region 74 extends from the first separation region 16 to the second separation region 16. In the avalanche diode in planar view, an area of the first semiconductor region 71 is smaller than an area of the second semiconductor region 74. The first semiconductor region 71, the second semiconductor region 74, and the third semiconductor region 75 have portions that overlap one another (see paragraphs 31-49, 80-92, and 142-149; Figs. 1, 6, and 10). With respect to Claim 2, Morimoto teaches each of the first separation region 16 and the second separation region is a semiconductor region of the second conductivity type (see Figs. 1, 6, and 10). With respect to Claim 3, Morimoto teaches the first separation region 16 and the second separation region 16 are connected to a contact plug applied with a predetermined potential (see Figs. 1, 6, and 10). With respect to Claim 4, Morimoto teaches a semiconductor region 6, 76 of the first conductivity type (i.e. N- type) that has an impurity concentration lower than an impurity concentration of the first semiconductor region 6 (i.e. N+ type) and is in contact with the first semiconductor region and the first separation region at the first depth (see Figs. 1, 6, and 10). With respect to Claim 5, Morimoto teaches a semiconductor region 6, 76 of the first conductivity type (i.e. N- type) that has an impurity concentration lower than an impurity concentration (i.e. N+ type) of the first semiconductor region and is in contact with the first semiconductor region and the second separation region at the first depth (see Figs. 1, 6, and 10). With respect to Claim 6, Morimoto teaches the avalanche diode includes a fourth semiconductor region 8 of the second type disposed at a fourth depth deeper than the third depth with respect to the first surface in cross sectional view (see Figs. 1, 6, and 10). With respect to Claim 7, Morimoto teaches the fourth semiconductor region 8 is in contact with the first separation region and the second separation region an impurity concentration of the fourth semiconductor region is higher than an impurity concentration of the second semiconductor region (see Figs. 1, 6, and 10). With respect to Claim 8, Morimoto teaches an impurity concentration of the fourth semiconductor region 8 is higher than an impurity concentration of the second semiconductor region (see Figs. 1, 6, and 10). With respect to Claim 9, Morimoto teaches an area of the third semiconductor region 75 is larger than the area of the first semiconductor region 71 in planar view (see Figs. 1, 6, and 10). With respect to Claim 10, Morimoto teaches an area of the third semiconductor region 5 is larger than the area of the first semiconductor region 1 in planar view (see Figs. 1, 6, and 10). With respect to Claims 11 and 12, Morimoto teaches the semiconductor substrate 15 includes a second surface opposing the first surface. The second surface is a light-incident surface (see paragraph 66; Figs. 1, 6, and 10). With respect to Claim 13, Morimoto teaches a wavelength conversion unit 1201 configured to convert light in a first wavelength band into light in a second wavelength band different from the first wavelength band. A signal processing unit configured to synthesize a plurality of images obtained from a plurality of digital signals held in the light detection device. The light in the second wavelength band output from the wavelength converting unit is incident on the light detection device (see paragraphs 194-199). With respect to Claims 14, Morimoto teaches a light emission unit configured to emit light detected by the light detection device; and a distance calculation unit 1309 configured to perform distance calculation using digital signals held in the light detection device (see paragraphs 204 and 208). With respect to Claims 15, Morimoto teaches the light detection system comprising a signal processing unit 102 configured to process a signal from the light detection device (see paragraph 55; Fig. 4). With respect to Claims 16, Morimoto teaches a distance information acquisition unit configured to acquire distance information relating to a distance to an object, using a signal from the light detection device; and a control unit configured to control the moving body based on the distance information (see paragraphs 211 and 212). Allowable Subject Matter 8. Claims 7, 11, 14, 18, and 19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowance subject matter: none of the prior art of record teaches or suggest the combination of one third terminal element arranged at the center of symmetry. The one or more dimensions and the one or more materials of the first electrical connection element are identical to the one or more dimensions and the one or more materials of the second electrical connection element. A length of the first segment of the third section is identical to a length of the second segment of the third section in claim 7. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is cited primarily to show the product of the instant invention. Conclusion 10. Any inquiry concerning the communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Alonzo Chambliss whose telephone number is (571) 272-1927. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Jacob Y. Choi can be reached on (469) 295-9060. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is (571) 273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PMR or Public PMR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PMR only. For more information about the PMR system see hittp://pair-dkect.usptol gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PMR system contact the Electronic Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). AC/August 14, 2026 /Alonzo Chambliss/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2897
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 24, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12751312
NANO-ROUGHENED INTERCONNECTS FOR INTEGRATED CIRCUIT PACKAGES
5y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12751144
Display Substrate and Display Apparatus
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12751294
LEAD FRAME WITH A TIE BAR HAVING BRANCH PART
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12751280
SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745494
LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THEREOF
3y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
66%
With Interview (-24.1%)
2y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1209 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month