Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/784,858

METHOD FOR PROVISIONING AD HOC MONITORING TIME FOR REPITITION GRANTS AND USER EQUIPMENT ENERGY SAVINGS

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jul 25, 2024
Priority
Jul 27, 2023 — provisional 63/515,972
Examiner
TOWFIGHI, AFSHAWN M
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Nokia Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
852 granted / 971 resolved
+27.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
983
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
64.2%
+24.2% vs TC avg
§102
25.4%
-14.6% vs TC avg
§112
3.3%
-36.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 971 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 12/13/24 is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 6 and 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 6 recites the limitation " wherein the removal of monitoring time" in line 1. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 7 is dependent on claim 6 and likewise rejected. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-7, 9, 12, 13, 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Maleki et al (Pub No: 2022/0104122). As to claim 1, Maleki teaches a user equipment, comprising: at least one processor; and at least one memory storing instruction that, when executed by the processor, cause the user equipment to (Maleki, Fig 2B, a UE with processor): identify one or more scheduled transmission intervals having a beginning time and an end time, based on initial scheduling information received from a network node (Maleki, [0048]-[0049], identifying a transmission from a network node to a UE with a PDCCH scheduling signal transmission with a first duration (beginning and end)), wherein the one or more scheduled transmission intervals is longer than a threshold duration for one or more uplink transmissions by the user equipment according to initial scheduling information (Maleki, [0133], the first duration and scheduling offset is greater than an indicated processing time by the network node), wherein the one or more scheduled transmission intervals comprises a head end portion and a tail end portion (Maleki, [0048]-[0049], a duration of scheduled transmission has a first and second half/section inherently), and the tail end portion accommodates a monitoring period (Maleki, [0132][0136], the portion includes a monitoring period); and transmit respectively, to a network node, at least one subsequent uplink transmission corresponding to a respective subsequent scheduled transmission interval, according to subsequent scheduling information received from the network node, within the monitoring period before the end time (Maleki, Fig 10 1080, 1090, [0137], transmitting another signal (second) according to a second offset and second scheduling PDCCH which is during the monitoring). As to claim 2, Maleki teaches is further caused to perform at least one of: (a) monitor the subsequent scheduling information during the tail end portion of a first scheduled transmission interval; (Maleki, [0135], monitoring for other scheduling PDCCH subsequent of the first duration). As to claim 3, Maleki teaches wherein the subsequent scheduling information is transmitted by the network node to the user equipment during the monitoring period of the tail end portion before the end time, to allocate the subsequent scheduled transmission interval for the subsequent uplink transmission by the user equipment (Maleki, [0135], monitoring for other scheduling PDCCH subsequent of the first duration).. As to claim 4, Maleki teaches wherein the monitoring period is accommodated to the tail end portion of the first scheduled transmission interval (Maleki, [0135], monitoring for other scheduling PDCCH subsequent of the first duration). As to claim 5, Maleki teaches wherein the scheduled transmission interval enables the user equipment to perform at least one of: transmit during the first scheduled transmission interval according to one or more physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) grants (Maleki, [0014], the interval is for transmitting on UL transmission grant PUSCH). As to claim 6, Maleki teaches wherein the removal of monitoring time for the subsequent transmitted information during the head end portion of the first scheduled transmission interval resulted from one or more priorly scheduled physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) grants (Maleki, [0102], stopping monitoring PDCCH based on DRX and inactivity timer for scheduled grants). As to claim 7, Maleki teaches wherein at least one of the one or more priorly scheduled physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) grants schedules respective PUSCH repetitions (Maleki, [0102], stopping monitoring PDCCH based on DRX and inactivity timer for scheduled grants any further repetitions). As to claim 9, Maleki teaches wherein at least one of the head end portion or the tail end portion of the first scheduled transmission interval comprises a predetermined number (Maleki, Fig 3A, [0018], the frames have predetermined values which are numeric). As to claim 12, Maleki teaches a network node, comprising: at least one processor; and at least one memory storing instructions that, when executed by the processor (Maleki, Fig 2B, a network node with processor), cause the network node to: configure, a user equipment, with parameters and indicators that instruct the user equipment to identify one or more scheduled transmission intervals having a beginning time and an end time, based on initial scheduling information to a first scheduled transmission interval received from a network node (Maleki, [0048]-[0049], identifying a transmission from a network node to a UE with a PDCCH scheduling signal transmission with a first duration (beginning and end)), wherein the one or more scheduled transmission intervals is longer than a threshold duration for one or more uplink transmissions by the user equipment according to the initial scheduling information (Maleki, [0133], the first duration and scheduling offset is greater than an indicated processing time by the network node), wherein the one or more scheduled transmission intervals comprises a head end portion and a tail end portion (Maleki, [0048]-[0049], a duration of scheduled transmission has a first and second half/section inherently), and the tail end portion accommodates a monitoring period (Maleki, [0132][0136], the portion includes a monitoring period); and receive respectively, from the user equipment, at least one subsequent uplink transmission corresponding to a respective subsequent scheduled transmission interval, according to subsequent scheduling information received from the network node, within the monitoring period before the end time (Maleki, Fig 10 1080, 1090, [0137], receiving from UE another signal (second) according to a second offset and second scheduling PDCCH which is during the monitoring). As to claim 13, Maleki teaches wherein the subsequent scheduling information is transmitted by the network node to the user equipment during the monitoring period of the tail end portion before the end time, to allocate the subsequent scheduled transmission interval for the subsequent uplink transmission by the user equipment (Maleki, [0135], monitoring for other scheduling PDCCH subsequent of the first duration).. As to claim 17, Maleki teaches wherein at least one of the head end portion or the tail end portion of the first scheduled transmission interval comprises a predetermined number of slots (Maleki, Fig 3A, [0018], the frames have predetermined slots). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 8, 10, 11, 14-16 and 18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Yang et al (WO 2021/163417) [0005]-[0050]. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AFSHAWN M TOWFIGHI whose telephone number is (571)270-7296. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00 AM -5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ian N Moore can be reached at 571-272-3085. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AFSHAWN M TOWFIGHI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2469
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 25, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683662
COMMUNICATION METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12684595
TECHNIQUES FOR RADIO ACCESS TECHNOLOGY COEXISTENCE IN SIDELINK CHANNELS
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12666280
NEIGHBOR CELL CONFIGURATION METHOD AND APPARATUS THEREFOR
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12666281
CELL ACTIVATION METHOD, DEVICE, SYSTEM AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12659785
MINIMIZING INTERFERENCE BETWEEN TERRESTRIAL NETWORK SIGNALS AND NON-TERRESTRIAL NETWORK SIGNALS
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+8.9%)
2y 6m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 971 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month