Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/785,521

WEB EDGE METROLOGY

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 26, 2024
Examiner
TADAYYON ESLAMI, TABASSOM
Art Unit
1718
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Elevated Materials US LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
50%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 7m
To Grant
77%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 50% of resolved cases
50%
Career Allow Rate
384 granted / 776 resolved
-15.5% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+27.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
65 currently pending
Career history
841
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
60.2%
+20.2% vs TC avg
§102
15.7%
-24.3% vs TC avg
§112
20.7%
-19.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 776 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 9, 12-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Thomas Deppisch et al (WO 2018/228683, here after Deppisch). Claim 1 is rejected. Deppisch teaches a flexible substrate coating system [abstract lines 1-2], comprising: a processing module [fig. 5], comprising: a plurality of chambers (121) arranged in sequence, each configured to perform one or more processing operations to a continuous sheet of flexible material; and a coating drum (122) capable of guiding the continuous sheet of flexible material past the plurality of chambers along a travel direction, wherein the chambers are radially disposed about the coating drum [fig. 5]; and a metrology module [00114], comprising: a plurality of non-contact sensors positioned side-by-side along a transverse direction, wherein the transverse direction is perpendicular to the travel direction [00102-00103]. Claim 9 is rejected as Deppisch teaches an unwinding module housing a feed reel capable of providing the continuous sheet of flexible material; and a winding module housing a take-up reel capable of storing the continuous sheet of flexible material [fig. 5, 0022, 0046]. Claim 12 is rejected as Deppisch teaches the plurality of chambers comprises sputtering source [0049]. Claim 13 is rejected as Deppisch teaches a flexible substrate coating system[abstract], comprising: a processing module [fig. 5], comprising: a plurality of chambers (121) arranged in sequence, each configured to perform one or more processing operations to a continuous sheet of flexible material; and a coating drum (122) capable of guiding the continuous sheet of flexible material past the plurality of chambers along a travel direction, wherein the chambers are radially disposed about the coating drum [fig. 5]; a metrology module, comprising: a plurality of non-contact sensors positioned side-by-side along a transverse direction [00102-00103]; an unwinding module housing a feed reel capable of providing the continuous sheet of flexible material [0022, fig. 5]; and a winding module housing a take-up reel capable of storing the continuous sheet of flexible material [0046, fig. 5]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 10-11, and 16-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Thomas Deppisch et al (WO 2018/228683, here after Deppisch, further in view of Girish Kumar Golpalakrishnan Nair et al (U. S. Patent Application: 2019/0140267, here after Nair). Claim 10 is rejected. Deppisch teaches the limitation of claim 1, and teaches the flexible substrate is for battery formation [0001, 0003] comprising chambers on radial direction of rotating drum [fig. 11]. Deppisch does not teach the substrate is lithium metal layer formed on copper. Nair teaches a coating system for coating metal electrode(anode) for lithium batteries and also teaches the substrate is lithium coated copper substrate [0006, 0007]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention was made to have a system of Deppisch and form a lithium battery as Nair teaches and form a lithium battery as Nair teaches, and flexible substrate is lithium coated on copper, because the system is suitable for making batteries. Claim 11 is rejected as Nair teaches the continuous sheet of flexible material comprises a copper substrate having a lithiated anode film formed on the copper substrate, and wherein the lithiated anode film comprises a graphite anode film, a or a silicon film [0042]. Claim 16 is rejected. Deppisch teaches the limitation of claim 13, and teaches the flexible substrate is for battery formation [0001, 0003] comprising chambers on radial direction of rotating drum [fig. 11]. Deppisch does not teach the substrate is lithium metal layer formed on copper. Nair teaches a coating system for coating metal electrode(anode) for lithium batteries and also teaches the substrate is lithium coated copper substrate [0006, 0007]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention was made to have a system of Deppisch and form a lithium battery as Nair teaches, and flexible substrate is lithium coated on copper because the system is suitable for making batteries. Claims 17-18 are rejected as Nair teaches the continuous sheet of flexible material comprises a copper substrate having a lithiated anode film formed on the copper substrate, and wherein the lithiated anode film comprises a graphite anode film, a or a silicon film [0042]. Claim 19 is rejected as Deppisch teaches the plurality of chambers comprises sputtering source [0049], Nair also teaches sputtering the anode layer [0042]. Claims 2-4, 6-7, 14, and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Thomas Deppisch et al (WO 2018/228683, here after Deppisch, further in view of John F. Shakespeare (U. S. Patent Application: 2008/0013818, here after Shakespeare). Claims 2-4 are rejected. Deppisch teaches forming coated pattern on flexible web [0013] and reduce in wrinkle generation in substrate [00116], but does not teach measuring the wrinkle. Shakespeare teaches measuring crepe pattern on a moving web by light Source and CCD array [0048, 0060] in width direction [0083]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention was made to have a system of Deppisch, where a light Source and CCD array in width direction of moving web is inserted, because it helps measuring wrinkle and crepe. Claims 6-7 and 14 are rejected. Deppisch teaches forming coated pattern (coated and uncoated) on flexible web [0013] and reduce in wrinkle generation in substrate [00116], but does not teach measuring the wrinkle(roughness). Shakespeare teaches measuring crepe pattern on a moving web by laser light Source and CMOS array camera [0048, 0060] in width direction [0083]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention was made to have a system of Deppisch, where a light Source and CMOS array camera in width direction of moving web is inserted to measure roughness of uncoated portion of the continuous sheet of flexible material, because it helps measuring roughness (wrinkle, flutter, and crepe). Shakespeare also teaches measuring pattern profile of flatter(profilometer) [0099]. Claim 20 is rejected. Deppisch teaches a flexible substrate coating system, comprising: a processing module, comprising: a plurality of chambers (301) arranged in sequence, each configured to perform one or more processing operations to a continuous sheet of flexible material [fig. 5]; and a coating drum (122) capable of guiding the continuous sheet of flexible material past the plurality of chambers along a travel direction, wherein the chambers are radially disposed about the coating drum [fig. 5]; and a metrology module [00114], comprising: a plurality of non-contact sensors positioned side-by-side along a transverse direction wherein the plurality of non-contact sensors [00102-00103]. Deppisch teaches forming coated pattern (coated and uncoated) on flexible web [0013] and reduce in wrinkle generation in substrate [00116], but does not teach measuring the wrinkle(roughness). Shakespeare teaches measuring crepe pattern on a moving web by laser light Source and CMOS array camera [0048, 0060] in width direction [0083]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention was made to have a system of Deppisch, where a light Source and CMOS array camera in width direction of moving web is inserted to measure roughness of uncoated portion of the continuous sheet of flexible material, because it helps measuring roughness (wrinkle, and crepe). Claim 5 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Thomas Deppisch et al (WO 2018/228683, here after Deppisch), further in view of Wilmert De Bosscher et al (WO 2018/215274, here after De Bosscher). Claim 5 is rejected. Deppisch teaches the substrate is patterned (coated and uncoated), but does not teach the non-contact sensors are eddy current sensors. De Bosscher teaches measuring thickness along width direction by multiple first and second eddy current sensors (221, 222) [fig. 2]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention was made to have a system of Deppisch where the thickness sensors are eddy current sensor because they are suitable to measure thickness along width of a continuous web. The first or second sensors can be used for measuring thickness of coated or uncoated area by skill in art. Claims 8 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Thomas Deppisch et al (WO 2018/228683, here after Deppisch, John F. Shakespeare (U. S. Patent Application: 2008/0013818, here after Shakespeare), further in view of Dov Furman et al (U. S. Patent Application: 2009/0201494, here after Furman). Claim 8 is rejected for the same reason claim 7 is rejected above. Shakespeare teaches inspecting surface with CMOS array cameras and laser beam, but does not teach the laser beam is argon laser beam. Furman teaches inspecting surface with CMOS cameras [0119] where the laser light is argon laser light [0121]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention was made to have a system of Deppisch, and Shakespeare, where the laser light is argon laser light, because it is suitable laser light source in combination with CMOS cameras to inspect surface. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TABASSOM TADAYYON ESLAMI whose telephone number is (571)270-1885. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:30-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Gordon Baldwin can be reached at 5712725166. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TABASSOM TADAYYON ESLAMI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1718
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 26, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599968
METHOD OF PRODUCING AN ADDITIVE MANUFACTURED OBJECT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600634
2D AMORPHOUS CARBON FILM ASSEMBLED FROM GRAPHENE QUANTUM DOTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601049
AG- AND/OR CU- CONTAINING HARD COATINGS WITH ANTIBACTERIAL, ANTIVIRAL AND ANTIFUNGAL PROPERTIES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12590372
LASER INDUCED FORWARD TRANSFER OF 2D MATERIALS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12585183
METHOD OF FORMING AN ELECTRONIC DEVICE ON A FLEXIBLE SUBSTRATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
50%
Grant Probability
77%
With Interview (+27.1%)
3y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 776 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month