Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/788,175

PASSIVE LIQUID RECYCLE DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 30, 2024
Priority
Mar 25, 2024 — TW 113111043
Examiner
PAPE, ZACHARY
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
We Solutions Technology Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
801 granted / 1106 resolved
+12.4% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
1137
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
81.7%
+41.7% vs TC avg
§102
9.6%
-30.4% vs TC avg
§112
7.2%
-32.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1106 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Email Communication Applicant is encouraged to authorize the Examiner to communicate via email by filing form PTO/SB/439 either via USPS, Central Fax, or EFS-Web. See MPEP 502.01, 502, 502.05. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Fujiwara et al. (US 10,149,408 – hereinafter, “Fujiwara”). With respect to claim 1, Fujiwara teaches (In Fig 10) a passive liquid recycle device (9A, 10A), adapted to be in communication with a two-phase immersion cooling device (1A), the passive liquid recycle device comprising: a housing (9A); and at least one bag (10A), accommodated in a volume variable manner in the housing, the bag being higher than the two-phase immersion cooling device (See Fig 10) and capable of passively receiving a gaseous coolant from the two-phase immersion cooling device and accordingly expanding, and contracting after the gaseous coolant condenses into a liquid coolant and returns to the two-phase immersion cooling device (Col. 3, ll. 22-36, Col. 6, ll. 46-64). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 1-4, 7-8, 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hsieh et al. (US 2025/0282541 – hereinafter, “Hsieh”) in view of Tian et al. (US 10,568,236 – hereinafter, “Tian”). With respect to claim 1, Hsieh teaches (In Fig 1) a passive liquid recycle device (1), adapted to be in communication with a two-phase immersion cooling device (¶ 0016, “In this embodiment, the deformable container 12 may be connected to an airtight base 16 through a quick release connector 14, and the airtight base 16 may be connected to a cooling tank of an immersion cooling system (not shown) through a tube (not shown). In general, the cooling tank may store a cooling liquid (e.g. dielectric liquid) with a low boiling point. An electronic component (not shown) may be immersed in the cooling liquid”), the passive liquid recycle device comprising: a housing (10); and at least one bag (120), accommodated in a volume variable manner in the housing (See Fig 1), the bag being capable of passively receiving a gaseous coolant from the two-phase immersion cooling device and accordingly expanding, and contracting after the gaseous coolant condenses into a liquid coolant and returns to the two-phase immersion cooling device (¶ 0016, “The cooling liquid evaporates and changes into gas after absorbing the heat generated by the electronic component. The deformable container 12 is used to temporarily store the gas of the cooling liquid and control the pressure.”, ¶ 0026, “In this embodiment, a bottom 1206 of the bag body 120 may be inclined with respect to the first tube portion 1220 of the first connecting member 122 to help recover the liquid condensed from the gas of the cooling liquid.”). Hsieh fails to specifically teach or suggest that the bag is higher than the two-phase immersion cooling device. Tian, however, teaches a flexible membrane (20-2) which is higher than a two-phase immersion cooling device (10, see Fig 2). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Tian with that of Hsieh, such that, in Hsieh, the bag is higher than the two-phase immersion cooling device, as taught by Tian, since doing so would locate the passive liquid recycling device of Hsieh to a position relative to the two-phase immersion cooling device that allow for the passive liquid recycling device to be relatively close to the cooling device while also being in the natural flow path of any vapor which would be emitted from the cooling device. With respect to claim 2, Hsieh further teaches a communication pipe group (16), wherein the passive liquid recycle device (1) is in communication with the two-phase immersion cooling device via the communication pipe group (16 + tube, ¶ 0016, “and the airtight base 16 may be connected to a cooling tank of an immersion cooling system (not shown) through a tube (not shown).”). With respect to claim 3, Hsieh further teaches that the communication pipe group has an outer pipe (“tube”) and a guide pipe (16), the outer pipe (“tube”) is in communication with an interior of a sealed chamber of the two-phase immersion cooling device (¶ 0016, “and the airtight base 16 may be connected to a cooling tank of an immersion cooling system (not shown) through a tube (not shown).”), and the guide pipe (16) is in communication with the outer pipe (“tube”) and an interior of the bag (120). With respect to claim 4, Hsieh further teaches a plurality of bags (120) are provided (¶ 0017, “two deformable containers 12”), and the interiors of the plurality of bags are all in communication with the guide pipe (16 is connected to both bags). With respect to claim 7, Hsieh further teaches that the housing (10) has therein at least one first hanging portion (100), and the bag (120) has at least one second hanging portion (1300), wherein the second hanging portion is detachably connected to the corresponding first hanging portion (¶ 0025). With respect to claim 8, Hsieh further teaches that the first hanging portion is disposed on an inner side of a top surface of the housing (See Fig 1, top portion of 10 has 100), and the second hanging portion (1300) is disposed on a top end of the bag (See Fig 1, the top of 120 is connected to 10 via 100). With respect to claim 10, Hsieh further teaches that the housing (10) has at least one pressure balance opening (Top opening between frame members. This opening allows the pressure to balance between inside the housing and outside the housing and is thus a pressure balance opening). Claim 5 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hsieh in view of Tian and further in view of Tung et al. (US 11,262,135 – hereinafter, “Tung”). With respect to claim 5, Hsieh as modified by Tian teaches the limitations of claim 3 as per above and Hsieh further teaches wherein the guide pipe (16) is obliquely disposed (See Fig 1). Hsieh as modified by Tian fails to specifically teach or suggest a position thereof in communication with the outer pipe is lower than a position thereof in communication with the bag. Tung, however, teaches (In Fig 2A) a guide pipe (150) which is in communication with a bellows (130) at a first position and in communication with a outer pipe (154) at a second position, the second position being lower than the first position (See Fig 2A). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Tung with that of Hsieh such that, in Hsieh, the outer pipe is connected to the guide pipe at a bottom of the guide pipe, whereby a position thereof in communication with the outer pipe is lower than a position thereof in communication with the bag, as taught by Tung, since doing so would allow for the condensate from the bag to flow to the cooling device via gravity. Claim 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hsieh in view of Tian and further in view of Tung et al. (US 11,378,344 – hereinafter, “Tung-344”). With respect to claim 6, Hsieh as modified by Tian teaches the limitations of claim 3 as per above and Hsieh further teaches that the guide pipe (16) is located within the housing. Hsieh as modified by Tian fails to specifically teach or suggest that the outer pipe is at least partially located outside the housing. Tung-344, however, teaches (In Fig 2) an outer pipe (200) located outside of a housing (351) It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Tung with that of Hsieh such that, in Hsieh, the outer pipe is at least partially located outside of the housing, as taught by Tung-344, since doing so would allow for portions of the outer pipe to be easily accessible. Claim 9 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hsieh in view of Tian and further in view of Maloney et al. (US 2016/0073547 – hereinafter, “Maloney”). With respect to claim 9, Hsieh as modified by Tian teaches the limitations of claim 1 as per above but fails to specifically teach or suggest wherein the housing has a frame base and a plurality of door panels, and the plurality of door panels are openably coupled on different sides of the frame base. Maloney, however, teaches (In Fig 10) wherein a housing (100) has a frame base and a plurality of door panels (142), and the plurality of door panels are openably coupled on different sides of the frame base. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Maloney with that of Hsieh such that, in Hsieh, the housing has a frame base and a plurality of door panels, and the plurality of door panels are openably coupled on different sides of the frame base, as taught by Maloney, since doing so would provide mechanical protection on two sides of the housing of Hsieh thus providing protection to the one or more bags hanging in the housing. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 12,408,299 to Li et al. which teaches an immersion cooling system and pressure adjust module; CN 107978574 to Tong et al. which teaches an immersion cooling system with a variable volume storage container; and US 4,639,251 to Kirkland which teaches a flexible collapsible container with openings (15, 17) which allows the container to be suspended. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ZACHARY M PAPE whose telephone number is (571)272-2201. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 9am - 6pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JAYPRAKASH Gandhi can be reached at 571-272-3740. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ZACHARY PAPE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2841
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 30, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684734
IMMERSION COOLING SYSTEM FOR INTEGRATED CIRCUIT
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12684737
Sealed Rack Server Unit
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12684743
THERMAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM INCLUDING AN OVERMOLDED LAYER AND A CONDUCTIVE LAYER OVER A CIRCUIT BOARD
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12672266
ELECTRONIC CONTROL DEVICE
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12666579
ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+19.2%)
2y 5m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1106 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month