Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 26, 2026
Application No. 18/788,547

METHOD FOR CONTROLLING WATER HEATER, WATER HEATER AND STORAGE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 30, 2024
Priority
Jul 31, 2023 — CN 202310963183.6
Examiner
WANG, ZHIPENG
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Wuhu Midea Smart Kitchen Appliance Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
441 granted / 545 resolved
+20.9% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
562
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.3%
-29.7% vs TC avg
§103
51.3%
+11.3% vs TC avg
§102
16.6%
-23.4% vs TC avg
§112
13.8%
-26.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 545 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-20 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 13, and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by AI et al. (hereinafter “AI578”) (CN 111023578 A). As to claims 1, 13, and 20, AI578 teaches the invention ([Abstract] The invention claims a water heater water outlet temperature control method and a control system), comprises: determining that the water heater is in a minimum load operation state ([Fig. 1] [Abstract] judging whether the water heater works in minimum heat load state and continuing to judge the water temperature T2 is greater than the pre-heating temperature T); in accordance with a determination that the water heater is in the minimum load operation state, detecting an outlet water temperature of the water heater ([Fig. 1] [Abstract] judging whether the water heater works in minimum heat load state and continuing to judge the water temperature T2 is greater than the pre-heating temperature T); determining that the outlet water temperature meets a preset condition ([Fig. 1] [Abstract] continuing to judge the water temperature T2 is greater than the pre-heating temperature T…the water heater works in the minimum heat load state, by comparing the outlet water temperature T2 and pre-heating temperature T, judging whether stopping the water heater works, the water heater of the water temperature will not be too high; [page 4] during the step 600, the water heater is started, judging whether the water heater works at a minimum heat load state, if so, continuously judging whether the outlet water temperature T2 is greater than the pre-heating temperature T, if so, controlling the water heater stops heating); and in accordance with a determination that the outlet water temperature meets the preset condition, controlling the water heater to stop heating ([Fig. 1] [Abstract] the water heater works in the minimum heat load state, by comparing the outlet water temperature T2 and pre-heating temperature T, judging whether stopping the water heater works, the water heater of the water temperature will not be too high; [page 4] during the step 600, the water heater is started, judging whether the water heater works at a minimum heat load state, if so, continuously judging whether the outlet water temperature T2 is greater than the pre-heating temperature T, if so, controlling the water heater stops heating). Claim(s) 1-3, 13-15, and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by AI et al. (hereinafter “AI946”) (CN 112178946 A). As to claims 1, 13, and 20, AI946 teaches the invention, comprises: determining that the water heater is in a minimum load operation state ([Fig. 1] [Abstract] judging the intake air amount of the gas water heater, if it is at the maximum load, executing S50, if it is at the minimum load, executing S60); in accordance with a determination that the water heater is in the minimum load operation state, detecting an outlet water temperature of the water heater ([page 3] According to some embodiments of the invention, after S60,… if the water outlet temperature of the gas water heater is still greater than or equal to the target temperature + β, judging whether the lasting time of the water outlet temperature is greater than or equal to α seconds); determining that the outlet water temperature meets a preset condition ([page 3] According to some embodiments of the invention, after S60,… if the water outlet temperature of the gas water heater is still greater than or equal to the target temperature + β, judging whether the lasting time of the water outlet temperature is greater than or equal to α seconds); and in accordance with a determination that the outlet water temperature meets the preset condition, controlling the water heater to stop heating ([page 3] According to some embodiments of the invention, after S60,… if the water outlet temperature of the gas water heater is still greater than or equal to the target temperature + β, judging whether the lasting time of the water outlet temperature is greater than or equal to α seconds…when the gas water heater is in the minimum load, if the water outlet temperature is still higher than the target temperature + β, and continuously exceeds α seconds, at this time, the gas water heater can be stopped). As to claims 2 and 14, AI946 teaches the preset condition includes that: the outlet water temperature is greater than a set temperature of the water heater, and a temperature difference value between the outlet water temperature and the set temperature is not less than a temperature difference threshold ([page 3] According to some embodiments of the invention, after S60,… if the water outlet temperature of the gas water heater is still greater than or equal to the target temperature + β, judging whether the lasting time of the water outlet temperature is greater than or equal to α seconds…when the gas water heater is in the minimum load, if the water outlet temperature is still higher than the target temperature + β, and continuously exceeds α seconds, at this time, the gas water heater can be stopped). As to claims 3 and 15, AI946 teaches the preset condition further includes that a change value of the outlet water temperature is less than a preset value ([page 3] According to some embodiments of the invention, if the duration is less than α seconds, the gas water heater keeps the minimum load operation. In order to avoid the fluctuation of the water temperature influence to the judging result, generally need delay setting. According to some embodiments of the present invention, β is a positive integer with a temperature unit, and 1 ° C < β 4 ° C. The value of the beta can be preset by the manufacturer. Some embodiments created according to the invention, 10 ≤α ≥20. the value of α is not too small or too large; when the value of α is too small, it is difficult to eliminate the influence of water temperature fluctuation; when the value of α is too large, it will affect the water use experience of the user. According to some embodiments of the present invention, λ is a positive integer with a temperature unit, and 1 ° C < λ > 5 ° C. The value of the λ can be preset by the manufacturer.). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 4-11, 16-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over AI946 in view of BAI et al. (hereinafter “BAI”) (CN 113108474 A). As to claims 4 and 16, AI946 teaches in accordance with a determination that the outlet water temperature meets the preset condition, controlling the water heater to stop heating ([page 3] According to some embodiments of the invention, after S60,… if the water outlet temperature of the gas water heater is still greater than or equal to the target temperature + β, judging whether the lasting time of the water outlet temperature is greater than or equal to α seconds…when the gas water heater is in the minimum load, if the water outlet temperature is still higher than the target temperature + β, and continuously exceeds α seconds, at this time, the gas water heater can be stopped). AI946 does not explicitly teach after controlling the water heater to stop heating: determining that the outlet water temperature of the water heater drops to meet a second preset condition; and in accordance with a determination that the outlet water temperature of the water heater drops to meet the second preset condition, controlling the water heater to start heating. However, BAI teaches a method and system for water heater control. Especially, BAI teaches after controlling the water heater to stop heating: determining that the outlet water temperature of the water heater drops to meet a second preset condition; and in accordance with a determination that the outlet water temperature of the water heater drops to meet the second preset condition, controlling the water heater to start heating ([page 13] Specifically, if according to a plurality of water temperature value, determining the water temperature is continuously reduced, until the current water outlet temperature value is less than or equal to the eighth threshold value, determining the target heating power of the water heater is the second heating power. Exemplary, the eighth threshold is 91 degrees centigrade for example, when the water heater stops heating, if the temperature is continuously reduced until the water outlet temperature is less than or equal to 91 degrees centigrade, controlling the water heater to heat at 2 KW power). It would have been obvious to an ordinary person skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to incorporate the teachings of BAI with the teachings of AI946 for the purpose of restart the water heater to maintain the outlet water temperature a desired level by using different temperature threshold levels to improve the user experience. As to claims 5 and 17, BAI teaches the second preset condition includes at least one of following conditions: a current outlet water temperature of the water heater is greater than a set temperature of the water heater, and a temperature difference value between the current outlet water temperature and the set temperature of the water heater is not greater than a temperature difference threshold; and a time duration during which the water heater stops heating is not less than a target time duration [pages 9-14]. As to claims 6 and 18, BAI teaches the target time duration is negatively correlated with an inlet water flow rate of the water heater [pages 10-11]. As to claims 7 and 19, BAI teaches before controlling the water heater to start heating: obtaining a number of times that the water heater stops heating in the minimum load operation state, and/or a change value of the outlet water temperature of the water heater during a last period of heating cessation, and/or an ambient temperature corresponding to the water heater; and determining the temperature difference threshold based on the number of times and/or the change value of the outlet water temperature and/or the ambient temperature [pages 9-14]. As to claim 8, BAI teaches determining the temperature difference threshold includes: obtaining a target correspondence among the number of times, the change value of the outlet water temperature, and the temperature difference threshold according to the ambient temperature; and determining the temperature difference threshold corresponding to the number of times and the change value of the outlet water temperature according to the target correspondence [pages 9-14]. As to claim 9, BAI teaches after controlling the water heater to stop heating: controlling the water heater to maintain a water-in and water-out state [pages 9-10]. As to claim 10, BAI teaches controlling the water heater to start heating includes: obtaining: a change rate of the outlet water temperature after the water heater stops heating, and a temperature difference value between a current outlet water temperature of the water heater and a set temperature of the water heater; adjusting a current inlet water flow rate of the water heater according to the temperature difference value and the change rate; and controlling the water heater to start heating [pages 9-14]. As to claim 11, BAI teaches after controlling the water heater to start heating: detecting again the outlet water temperature of the water heater in accordance with a determination that the water heater is in the minimum load operation state [pages 9-14]. Claim(s) 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over AI946 in view of HAMAGAMI et al. (hereinafter “HAMAGAMI”) (US 20220196290 A1). As to claim 12, AI946 teaches in accordance with a determination that the outlet water temperature meets the preset condition, controlling the water heater to stop heating ([page 3]). AI946 does not explicitly teach after controlling the water heater to stop heating: controlling a fan in a combustion chamber of the water heater to operate at a revolving speed not greater than a preset revolving speed to discharge smoke in the combustion chamber until the water heater starts heating. However, HAMAGAMI teaches a system and method for control hot water supply. Especially, HAMAGAMI teaches after controlling the water heater to stop heating: controlling a fan in a combustion chamber of the water heater to operate at a revolving speed not greater than a preset revolving speed to discharge smoke in the combustion chamber until the water heater starts heating [0055]. It would have been obvious to an ordinary person skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to incorporate the teachings of HAMAGAMI with the teachings of AI946 for the purpose of controlling combustion fan to driven at a lower rotation speed for a post-purge time to exhaust smoke in the combustion chamber. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ZHIPENG WANG whose telephone number is (571)272-5437. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 10-7. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kamini Shah can be reached at 5712722279. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ZHIPENG WANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2115
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 30, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12737178
INDUSTRIAL AUTOMATION DISTRIBUTED PROJECT CONTROL WITH MILESTONE ROLLBACK
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12731997
ELECTRIC POWER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND NON-TRANSITORY RECORDING MEDIUM
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12716608
AIR CONDITIONER CONTROL METHOD, AIR CONDITIONER, STORAGE MEDIUM AND DEVICE
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12717295
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USING MEMORY-MAPPED MEMORIES IN A MICROCONTROLLER-BASED INSTRUMENT
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12710738
3D MODELED OBJECT REPRESENTING A MANUFACTURING PRODUCT
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+23.1%)
2y 9m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 545 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month