Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/788,730

MIXED-MODE VIRTUAL BLOCK GENERATION

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jul 30, 2024
Priority
Sep 25, 2023 — provisional 63/540,232
Examiner
PHAM, LY D
Art Unit
2827
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Micron Technology, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
94%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 94% — above average
94%
Career Allowance Rate
963 granted / 1025 resolved
+26.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 8m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
1038
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.6%
-31.4% vs TC avg
§103
34.3%
-5.7% vs TC avg
§102
36.7%
-3.3% vs TC avg
§112
6.7%
-33.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1025 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1 – 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1, 3, and 8 – 14 include language considered to be Product and Process in the same claim. A single claim which claims both an apparatus and the method steps of using the apparatus is indefinite under 35 USC 112(b). See MPEP section 2173.05(p), II. Presently, claim 1 is drawn to a system, comprising a set of memory components and at least one processing device. The claim also includes methods steps of “identifying…”, “determining…”, “determining…”, and “generating…”. The LANGUAGE of the operation steps that the processing device performs is considered method steps language. Applicant is suggested to amend the claims (as example in claim 1) to include language as follow, … the at least one processing device being configured to: identify a region…; determine that …; determine that …; generate a virtual block…. Similarly, claims 3 and 8 – 14 also need to be amended. Claims 2 and 4 – 7 are also rejected for being dependent to rejected claim 1. Appropriate corrections/revisions are required in order to overcome this type of rejection. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 15 – 20 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior arts of record fail to teach or reasonably suggest a method comprising, in combination: identifying a region of a set of memory components, the region comprising a plurality of planes across a plurality of decks of the set of memory components; determining that a first memory block within a first deck of the plurality of decks of the region associated with a first plane of the plurality of planes is a first partial good block (PGB), the first PGB including a first portion categorized as being defective and a second portion categorized as being non-defective; determining that a second memory block within the region associated with a second plane of the plurality of planes is a full block (FB), the FB being categorized as non-defective; and generating a virtual block using the first PGB of the first memory block associated with the first plane and a portion of the FB of the second memory block associated with the second plane. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See additional cited references for related disclosures to the claimed invention. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LY D PHAM whose telephone number is (571)272-1793. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amir Zarabian can be reached at 571-272-1852. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. LY D. PHAM Examiner Art Unit 2827 /LY D PHAM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2827 February 18, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 30, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12639559
CALIBRATION OF ELECTRICAL PARAMETERS IN A DEEP LEARNING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK
4y 1m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12642102
SEMICONDUCTOR MODULE
2y 8m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12640222
ENABLING OR DISABLING ON-DIE ERROR-CORRECTING CODE FOR A MEMORY BUILT-IN SELF-TEST
2y 1m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12638990
SECOND READ INITIALIZATION ON LATCH-LIMITED MEMORY DEVICE
1y 10m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12633883
SENSING AND AMPLIFYING CIRCUIT RELATED TO A SENSING MARGIN
3y 4m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
94%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+3.3%)
1y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1025 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month