Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/789,613

PROGRAM OPERATIONS IN MEMORY DEVICES

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 30, 2024
Examiner
BASHAR, MOHAMMED A
Art Unit
2824
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Yangtze Memory Technologies Co., LTD.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
95%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 0m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 95% — above average
95%
Career Allow Rate
608 granted / 640 resolved
+27.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
665
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
63.4%
+23.4% vs TC avg
§102
11.0%
-29.0% vs TC avg
§112
8.8%
-31.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 640 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Information Disclosure Statement Acknowledgment is made of Applicant’s Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) form PTO-1449. These IDS has been considered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Joo (US Pub # 2024/0004572). Per MPEP 2111 and 2111.01, the claims are given their broadest reasonable interpretation and the words of the claims are given their plain meaning consistent with the specification without importing claim limitations from the specification. Regarding independent claim 1, Joo teaches a memory device, comprising: a memory cell array; and a peripheral circuit coupled to the memory cell array and configured to: during an n-th loop of a program operation performed on a first memory cell in the memory cell array (see Fig. 1-6, 10-12, 17-21, paragraph 0007-0009 where program voltage increased by step voltage ISPP during program operation, control logic 320 is peripheral circuit): apply a first voltage to a first bit line coupled to a second memory cell in the memory cell array, wherein the first memory cell and the second memory cell are coupled to a first word line (see Fig. 1-6, 10-12, 17-21, paragraph 0007-0009, 0074-0079, 0092-0093, 0097-0109, 0112-0115, 0122-0131, 0136-0156, 0168-0177 where first voltage applied to even BL during programming); discharge the first bit line to decrease a voltage of the first bit line from the first voltage to a second voltage, wherein the second voltage is lower than the first voltage (see Fig. 1-6, 10-12, 17-21, paragraph 0007-0009, 0074-0079, 0092-0093, 0097-0109, 0112-0115, 0122-0131, 0136-0156, 0168-0177 where first voltage discharged during T3-T4, discharged voltage is lower than the first voltage); and after the first voltage is applied to the first bit line, set a second bit line to floating, wherein the second bit line is coupled to the first memory cell (see Fig. 1-6, 10-12, 17-21, paragraph 0007-0009, 0074-0079, 0092-0093, 0097-0109, 0112-0115, 0122-0131, 0136-0156, 0168-0177 where second voltage V1_P applied to odd BL is floating). Even though Joo teaches program operation but silent exclusively about an n-th program loop. However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention was made to apply the teaching of Joo where programmed voltage was increased by step of ISPP during multiple program operation i.e. program loop for the purpose of effectively controlling memory operations of memory array in order to improve operation margin of memory string (see paragraph 00003). Regarding claim 2, Joo teaches all claimed subject matter as applied in prior rejection of claim 1 on which this claim depends. Joo further teaches, wherein the peripheral circuit is further configured to: during an (n-i)-th loop and an (n-j)-th loop of the program operation, apply a same voltage to the first word line, wherein i and j are two integers that are greater than zero and less than n, and i is greater than j (see Fig. 1-6, 10-12, 17-21, paragraph 0007-0009, 0074-0079, 0092-0093, 0097-0109, 0112-0115, 0122-0131, 0136-0156). Regarding claim 3, Joo teaches all claimed subject matter as applied in prior rejection of claim 2 on which this claim depends. Joo further teaches, wherein the peripheral circuit is further configured to: during a loop before the (n-i)-th loop of the program operation: apply the second voltage to the first bit line; and apply a program voltage to the first word line coupled to the first memory cell, wherein the program voltage is smaller than the same voltage applied during the (n-i)-th loop and the (n-j)-th loop (see Fig. 1-6, 10-12, 17-21, paragraph 0007-0009, 0074-0079, 0092-0093, 0097-0109, 0112-0115, 0122-0131, 0136-0156, 0168-0170). Regarding claim 4, Joo teaches all claimed subject matter as applied in prior rejection of claim 1 on which this claim depends. Joo further teaches, wherein a programming state of the first memory cell is the highest programming state among programming states of memory cells in the memory cell array (see Fig. 1-6, 10-12, 17-21, paragraph 0007-0009, 0074-0079, 0092-0093, 0097-0109, 0112-0115, 0122-0131, 0136-0150). Regarding claim 5, Joo teaches all claimed subject matter as applied in prior rejection of claim 1 on which this claim depends. Joo further teaches, wherein the second voltage is an inhibit voltage applied to the first bit line to inhibit programming of the second memory cell (see Fig. 1-6, 10-12, 17-21, paragraph 0007-0009, 0074-0079, 0092-0093, 0097-0109, 0112-0115, 0122-0131, 0136-0156). Regarding claim 6, Joo teaches all claimed subject matter as applied in prior rejection of claim 1 on which this claim depends. Joo further teaches, wherein the peripheral circuit is further configured to: during the n-th loop, apply a third voltage to a first select gate line coupled to a first select gate transistor to turn on the first select gate transistor, wherein the first memory cell and the first select gate transistor are coupled to the second bit line (see Fig. 1-6, 10-12, 17-21, paragraph 0007-0009, 0074-0079, 0092-0093, 0097-0109, 0112-0115, 0122-0131, 0136-0151). Regarding claim 7, Joo teaches all claimed subject matter as applied in prior rejection of claim 6 on which this claim depends. Joo further teaches, wherein the peripheral circuit is further configured to: apply a fourth voltage to a second select gate line coupled to a second select gate transistor to turn off the second select gate transistor, wherein a third memory cell and the second select gate transistor are coupled to the second bit line, and the fourth voltage is lower than the third voltage (see Fig. 1-6, 10-12, 17-21, paragraph 0007-0009, 0074-0079, 0092-0093, 0097-0109, 0112-0115, 0122-0131, 0136). Regarding claim 8, Joo teaches all claimed subject matter as applied in prior rejection of claim 7 on which this claim depends. Joo further teaches, wherein the fourth voltage is a negative voltage (see Fig. 1-6, 10-12, 17-21, paragraph 0007-0009, 0074-0079, 0092-0093, 0097-0109, 0112-0115, 0122-0131). Regarding claim 9, Joo teaches all claimed subject matter as applied in prior rejection of claim 1 on which this claim depends. Joo further teaches, wherein the n-th loop is the last loop of the program operation (see Fig. 1-6, 10-12, 17-21, paragraph 0007-0009, 0074-0079, 0092-0093, 0097-0109, 0112-0115, 0122-0130). Regarding claim 10, Joo teaches all claimed subject matter as applied in prior rejection of claim 1 on which this claim depends. Joo further teaches, wherein the peripheral circuit is further configured to: apply, during an (n-1)-th loop of the program operation, a fifth voltage to the first bit line, wherein the fifth voltage is lower than the first voltage (see Fig. 1-6, 10-12, 17-21, paragraph 0007-0009, 0074-0079, 0092-0093, 0097-0109, 0112-0115, 0122-0131, 0136-0139). Regarding claim 11, Joo teaches all claimed subject matter as applied in prior rejection of claim 10 on which this claim depends. Joo further teaches, wherein a difference between the fifth voltage and the first voltage is the same as or larger than a program voltage difference between the n-th loop and the (n-1)-th loop of the program operation (see Fig. 1-6, 10-12, 17-21, paragraph 0007-0009, 0074-0079, 0092-0093, 0097-0109, 0112-0115, 0122-0131, 0136-0148). Regarding claim 12, Joo teaches all claimed subject matter as applied in prior rejection of claim 10 on which this claim depends. Joo further teaches, wherein the peripheral circuit is further configured to: apply, during an (n-2)-th loop of the program operation, a sixth voltage to the first bit line, wherein the sixth voltage is lower than the fifth voltage, and a difference between the fifth voltage and the sixth voltage is lower than or equal to a difference between the first voltage and the fifth voltage (see Fig. 1-6, 10-12, 17-21, paragraph 0007-0009, 0074-0079, 0092-0093, 0097-0109, 0112-0115, 0122-0131, 0136-0156). Regarding claim 13, Joo teaches all claimed subject matter as applied in prior rejection of claim 2 on which this claim depends. Joo further teaches, wherein the same voltage is applied to the first word line during last two or more loops of the program operation (see Fig. 1-6, 10-12, 17-21, paragraph 0007-0009, 0074-0079, 0092-0093, 0097-0109, 0112-0115, 0122-0131, 0136). Regarding independent claim 14, Joo teaches a method, comprising: during an n-th loop of a program operation performed on a first memory cell in a memory cell array (see Fig. 1-6, 10-12, 17-21, paragraph 0007-0009 where program voltage increased by step voltage ISPP during program operation): applying a first voltage to a first bit line coupled to a second memory cell in the memory cell array, wherein the first memory cell and the second memory cell are coupled to a first word line (see Fig. 1-6, 10-12, 17-21, paragraph 0007-0009, 0074-0079, 0092-0093, 0097-0109, 0112-0115, 0122-0131, 0136-0156, 0168-0177 where first voltage applied to even BL during programming); discharging the first bit line to decrease a voltage of the first bit line from the first voltage to a second voltage, wherein the second voltage is lower than the first voltage (see Fig. 1-6, 10-12, 17-21, paragraph 0007-0009, 0074-0079, 0092-0093, 0097-0109, 0112-0115, 0122-0131, 0136-0156, 0168-0177 where first voltage discharged during T3-T4, discharged voltage is lower than the first voltage); and after the first voltage is applied to the first bit line, setting a second bit line to floating, wherein the second bit line is coupled to the first memory cell (see Fig. 1-6, 10-12, 17-21, paragraph 0007-0009, 0074-0079, 0092-0093, 0097-0109, 0112-0115, 0122-0131, 0136-0156, 0168-0177 where second voltage V1_P applied to odd BL is floating). Even though Joo teaches program operation but silent exclusively about an n-th program loop. However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention was made to apply the teaching of Joo where programmed voltage was increased by step of ISPP during multiple program operation i.e. program loop for the purpose of effectively controlling memory operations of memory array in order to improve operation margin of memory string (see paragraph 00003). Regarding claim 15, Joo teaches all claimed subject matter as applied in prior rejection of claim 14 on which this claim depends. Joo further teaches, further comprising: during an (n-i)-th loop and an (n-j)-th loop of the program operation, applying a same voltage to the first word line, wherein i and j are two integers that are greater than zero and less than n, and i is greater than j (see Fig. 1-6, 10-12, 17-21, paragraph 0007-0009, 0074-0079, 0092-0093, 0097-0109, 0112-0115, 0122-0131, 0136-0145). Regarding claim 16, Joo teaches all claimed subject matter as applied in prior rejection of claim 15 on which this claim depends. Joo further teaches, further comprising: during a loop before the (n-i)-th loop of the program operation: applying the second voltage to the first bit line; and applying a program voltage to the first word line coupled to the first memory cell, wherein the program voltage is smaller than the same voltage applied during the (n-i)-th loop and the (n-j)-th loop (see Fig. 1-6, 10-12, 17-21, paragraph 0007-0009, 0074-0079, 0092-0093, 0097-0109, 0112-0115, 0122-0131, 0136-0156). Regarding claim 17, Joo teaches all claimed subject matter as applied in prior rejection of claim 14 on which this claim depends. Joo further teaches, wherein a programming state of the first memory cell is the highest programming state among programming states of memory cells in the memory cell array (see Fig. 1-6, 10-12, 17-21, paragraph 0007-0009, 0074-0079, 0092-0093, 0097-0109, 0112-0115, 0122-0131, 0136-0152). Regarding independent claim 18, Joo teaches a memory system, comprising: a memory device, comprising: a memory cell array; and a peripheral circuit coupled to the memory cell array and configured to perform operations comprising: during an n-th loop of a program operation performed on a first memory cell in the memory cell array (see Fig. 1-6, 10-12, 17-21, paragraph 0007-0009 where program voltage increased by step voltage ISPP during program operation): applying a first voltage to a first bit line coupled to a second memory cell in the memory cell array, wherein the first memory cell and the second memory cell are coupled to a first word line (see Fig. 1-6, 10-12, 17-21, paragraph 0007-0009, 0074-0079, 0092-0093, 0097-0109, 0112-0115, 0122-0131, 0136-0156, 0168-0177 where first voltage applied to even BL during programming); discharging the first bit line to decrease a voltage of the first bit line from the first voltage to a second voltage, wherein the second voltage is lower than the first voltage (see Fig. 1-6, 10-12, 17-21, paragraph 0007-0009, 0074-0079, 0092-0093, 0097-0109, 0112-0115, 0122-0131, 0136-0156, 0168-0177 where first voltage discharged during T3-T4, discharged voltage is lower than the first voltage); and after the first voltage is applied to the first bit line, setting a second bit line to floating, wherein the second bit line is coupled to the first memory cell; and a controller coupled to the memory device and configured to send one or more signals to the memory device to initiate the operations (see Fig. 1-6, 10-12, 17-21, paragraph 0007-0009, 0074-0079, 0092-0093, 0097-0109, 0112-0115, 0122-0131, 0136-0156, 0168-0177 where second voltage V1_P applied to odd BL is floating). Even though Joo teaches program operation but silent exclusively about an n-th program loop. However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention was made to apply the teaching of Joo where programmed voltage was increased by step of ISPP during multiple program operation i.e. program loop for the purpose of effectively controlling memory operations of memory array in order to improve operation margin of memory string (see paragraph 00003). Regarding claim 19, Joo teaches all claimed subject matter as applied in prior rejection of claim 18 on which this claim depends. Joo further teaches, wherein the operations further comprise: during an (n-i)-th loop and an (n-j)-th loop of the program operation, applying a same voltage to the first word line, wherein i and j are two integers that are greater than zero and less than n, and i is greater than j (see Fig. 1-6, 10-12, 17-21, paragraph 0007-0009, 0074-0079, 0092-0093, 0097-0109, 0112-0115, 0122-0131, 0136-0156, 0168). Regarding claim 20, Joo teaches all claimed subject matter as applied in prior rejection of claim 19 on which this claim depends. Joo further teaches, wherein the operations further comprise: during a loop before the (n-i)-th loop of the program operation: applying the second voltage to the first bit line; and applying a program voltage to the first word line coupled to the first memory cell, wherein the program voltage is smaller than the same voltage applied during the (n-i)-th loop and the (n-j)-th loop (see Fig. 1-6, 10-12, 17-21, paragraph 0007-0009, 0074-0079, 0092-0093, 0097-0109, 0112-0115, 0122-0131, 0136-0156, 0168-0177). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See attachment. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MOHAMMED A BASHAR whose telephone number is 469-295-9277. The examiner can normally be reached on 9am-5pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Richard T Elms can be reached on 5712721869. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MOHAMMED A BASHAR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2824
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 30, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Apr 07, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603125
SELF-TIMING READ TERMINATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597478
MEMORY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12580039
VOTING-BASED STATE SELECTION FOR A VOLATILE MEMORY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12580036
APPARATUSES AND METHODS FOR FORCING MEMORY CELL FAILURES IN A MEMORY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12573467
SENSE AMPLIFIER AND OUTPUT LATCH CIRCUIT FOR TESTING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
95%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+3.1%)
2y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 640 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month