Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 15, 2026
Application No. 18/794,991

PROXIMITY-BASED SURFACE TEXTURE GENERATION FOR SIMULATED ENVIRONMENT SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Aug 05, 2024
Examiner
WU, CHONG
Art Unit
2613
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
NVIDIA Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
429 granted / 497 resolved
+24.3% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
510
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
§103
67.3%
+27.3% vs TC avg
§102
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
§112
16.0%
-24.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 497 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Status This Office Action is responsive to claims filed on 08/05/2024. Please note Claims 1-20 are pending and have been examined. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 5, 15 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. Claim 5 recites “the 3D surface topology mesh” which lacks antecedent basis. The Claim 5 and its parent claim 1 fail to define any surface topology mesh. Claim 15 recites similar features of claim 5 and is therefore rejected. Claim 20 recites “one or more roadway surfaces” and “one or more drivable roadway surfaces”. It’s not clear whether they are referring to a same limitation. Clarification is needed. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-4, 6-14, and 16-19 are allowed. Claims 5, 15 and 20 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding independent claim 1, Arnicar (US 20230077909 A1) discloses correlating map data to polygon mesh, determining demarcation lines corresponding to lanes of surfaces, computing surface lines, and rendering the surfaces in a simulation environment (see [0014], [0017] and [0056]). CAI (US 20250336139 A1) discloses generating texel image and adjusting individual texels based on a function of distance (see [0130]-[0131]). However, claim 1 recites “generate a texel image representing a surface texture appearance for the one or more lanes, wherein individual texels of the texel image are adjusted based at least on a function of distance to at least one surface line of the one or more surface lines”. The combination of these features with other limitations as cited in the claims are neither disclosed nor suggested by the prior art of record. Independent claims 12 and 20 recite the similar features. Claim 12 recites “wherein individual texels of the set of texels are adjusted based at least on a function of distance to one or more surface lines derived from map data representing one or more drivable surfaces of the simulated environment”; Claim 20 recites “wherein the one or more individual texels are adjusted based at least on a function of distance to one or more surface lines derived from map data representing one or more drivable roadway surfaces”. The combination of these features with other limitations as cited in the claims are neither disclosed nor suggested by the prior art of record. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHONG WU whose telephone number is (571)270-5207. The examiner can normally be reached MON-FRI: 9AM-5PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Xiao Wu can be reached at 571-272-7761. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHONG WU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2613
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 05, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jul 06, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12657848
INGESTION PIPELINE FOR GENERATING AUGMENTED REALITY CONTENT GENERATORS
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12657827
TESSELLATION HARDWARE SUBDIVISION OF PATCHES INTO SUB-PATCHES
1y 10m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12646275
THREE-DIMENSIONAL OBJECT MANIPULATION CONTROL
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12646276
TRANSFORMING IMAGE INCLUDING NON-DIRECTIONAL OBJECT AND DIRECTIONAL OBJECT
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12646249
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR EXECUTING A TASK
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+3.3%)
2y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 497 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month