Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/795,947

ARRAY SUBSTRATE AND LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICE

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Aug 06, 2024
Examiner
QUARTERMAN, KEVIN J
Art Unit
2875
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Sharp Display Technology Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
706 granted / 857 resolved
+14.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
887
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
36.0%
-4.0% vs TC avg
§102
47.2%
+7.2% vs TC avg
§112
11.2%
-28.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 857 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment Applicant’s amendment and remarks received 02 December 2025 have been entered and overcome the claim rejections cited in the previous Office Action. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/(a)(2) as being anticipated by Waka (US 2020/0124906). Regarding independent claim 1, Waka teaches an array substrate (Fig. 4) comprising a first electrode (Fig. 4, Element 10f3; ¶ [0021]); a first insulating film (Fig. 4, Element 20; ¶ [0028]) disposed on an upper layer side of the first electrode, the first insulating film comprising an opening (Fig. 4, Element 26; ¶ [0030]) at a position overlapping at least the first electrode; a second electrode (Fig. 4, Element 10g2; ¶ [0030]) disposed on an upper layer side of the first insulating film, the second electrode overlapping the first electrode in at least the opening, and being connected to the first electrode; a second insulating film (Fig. 4, Element 24; ¶ [0028]) disposed on an upper layer side of the second electrode; and an alignment film (Fig. 4, Element 10n; ¶ [0025]) disposed on an upper layer side of the second insulating film, wherein the first electrode, the first insulating film, the second electrode, the second insulating film, and the alignment film are provided in a display region (Fig. 4, Element AA; ¶ [0020]), the second insulating film includes an insulating portion provided in the opening (Fig. 4), the insulating portion includes a high-level portion higher than an opening edge of the opening (Fig. 4), and the insulating portion is provided in the display region (Fig. 4). Regarding claim 2, Waka teaches a plurality of first electrodes (Fig. 3), including the first electrode, and a plurality of second electrodes (Fig. 3, Element 10g) including the second electrode are disposed side-by-side at intervals in a first direction, the plurality of first electrodes corresponds, respectively, to a plurality of first insulating films comprising a plurality of openings, and the plurality of second electrodes corresponds, respectively, to a plurality of second insulating films comprising a plurality of insulating portions, and each of the plurality of openings and the plurality of insulating portions extends along the first direction and is disposed to cross the plurality of first electrodes and the plurality of second electrodes (Figs. 3-4). Regarding claim 3, Waka teaches a first light blocking portion (Fig. 4, Element 10l; ¶ [0024]) disposed on a lower layer side of the first electrode, the first light blocking portion comprising a light blocking material, wherein the first light blocking portion extends along the first direction and is disposed overlapping the insulating portion (Fig. 4). Regarding claim 4, Waka teaches a plurality of second light blocking portions (Fig. 4, Element 21; ¶ [0029]) disposed on a lower layer side of the alignment film, the second light blocking portions comprising a light blocking material, wherein the plurality of second light blocking portions are disposed side-by-side at intervals to interpose the plurality of first electrodes and the plurality of second electrodes in the first direction, and each high-level portion of the plurality of insulating portions is disposed to be interposed between two of the second light blocking portions in the first direction (Figs. 3-4). Regarding claim 5, Waka teaches a height of the high-level portion from the opening edge of the opening of the first insulating film being larger than a film thickness of the alignment film (Fig. 4). Regarding claim 6, Waka teaches a height of the high-level portion from the opening edge of the opening of the first insulating film being smaller than a film thickness of the alignment film (Fig. 4). Regarding claim 7, Waka teaches the high-level portion configured to be gradually higher from an outer peripheral end side toward a center side of the insulating portion (Fig. 4). Regarding claim 8, Waka teaches an upper face of the high-level portion being a plane (Fig. 4). Regarding claim 9, Waka teaches the high-level portion (24) configured to be gradually lower from an outer peripheral end side toward a center side of the insulating portion (Fig. 4). Regarding claim 10, Waka teaches a liquid crystal display device (Fig. 3) comprising the array substrate according to claim 1; a counter substrate (Fig. 4, Element 10GS; ¶ [0019]) disposed to face the array substrate; and a liquid crystal layer (Fig. 4, Element 10c; ¶ [0019]) disposed between the array substrate and the counter substrate. Regarding claim 11, Waka teaches the counter substrate provided with a spacer (Fig. 4, Element 10p1; ¶ [0025]) protruding toward the array substrate, a plurality of first electrodes including the first electrode, and a plurality of second electrodes including the second electrode are disposed side-by-side at intervals in a first direction, the plurality of first electrodes corresponds, respectively, to a plurality of first insulating films comprising a plurality of openings, and the plurality of second electrodes corresponds, respectively, to a plurality of second insulating films comprising a plurality of insulating portions, each of the plurality of openings and the plurality of insulating portions extends in the first direction and is disposed to cross the plurality of first electrodes and the plurality of second electrodes (Figs. 3-4), and the insulating portion includes a bump higher than the opening edge of the opening and disposed overlapping the spacer (Fig. 4). Regarding claim 12, Waka teaches the high-level portion lower than the bump (Fig. 4). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments filed 02 December 2025 with respect to the rejection of claim 1 under 35 USC § 102 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground of rejection is made in view of Waka. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Kevin Quarterman whose telephone number is (571)272-2461. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 10am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, James Greece can be reached at (571) 272-3711. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Kevin Quarterman/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2875 19 March 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 06, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 27, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Dec 02, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 19, 2026
Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598863
DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12575299
DISPLAY MODULE AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12557517
DISPLAY DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12550584
DISPLAY DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD OF THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12550580
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+11.7%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 857 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month