Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/797,367

DATA PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS, COMPUTER DEVICE, AND READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §112§DOUBLEPATENT
Filed
Aug 07, 2024
Priority
Jan 25, 2021 — CN 202110098915.0 +2 more
Examiner
RIVERA, ANIBAL
Art Unit
2192
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Company Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allowance Rate
689 granted / 758 resolved
+35.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
785
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
14.7%
-25.3% vs TC avg
§103
44.3%
+4.3% vs TC avg
§102
26.0%
-14.0% vs TC avg
§112
7.7%
-32.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 758 resolved cases

Office Action

§112 §DOUBLEPATENT
CTNF 18/797,367 CTNF 87882 DETAILED ACTION This action is responsive to the application filed on August 07, 2024, which is a continuation of 17/965,668, filed on October 13, 2022, now US Pat. No. 12/099,855. Claims 1-20 are pending and are presented to examination. 07-03-aia AIA 15-10-aia The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA. 07-06 AIA 15-10-15 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Examiner Notes Examiner cites particular columns, paragraphs, figures and line numbers in the references as applied to the claims below for the convenience of the applicant. Although the specified citations are representative of the teachings in the art and are applied to the specific limitations within the individual claim, other passages and figures may apply as well. It is respectfully requested that, in preparing responses, the applicant fully consider the references in their entirety as potentially teaching all or part of the claimed invention, as well as the context of the passage as taught by the prior art or disclosed by the examiner. Drawings The drawings filed on August 07, 2024 and September 23, 2024 are acceptable for examination purposes. Foreign Priority The foreign priority date considered for this application is January 25, 2021. Information Disclosure Statement As required by M.P.E.P. 609, the applicant’s submission of the Information Disclosure Statement dated August 18, 2024 is acknowledged by the examiner and the cited references have been considered in the examination of the claims now pending. Specification The CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION section discloses a parent case 17/965,668 filed on October 13, 2022, now patented. The patent number must be disclosed on the record. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Objections 07-29-01 AIA Claim s 1-20 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 1 (and similar for claims 8 and 15): Line 7, replace “comprises causing” with --including--. Line 11, “the second service logic” lacks proper antecedent basis. Line 11, delete “causing”. Dependent claims 2-7, 9-14, and 16-20 do not overcome the deficiency of the base claim and, therefore, are objected for the same reasons as the base claim . Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 07-30-02 AIA The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. 07-34-01 Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. 07-34-05 AIA Claim 1 (and similar for claims 8 and 15) recites the limitation “ adjusting the state machine to a second state according to an execution result of the first service logic, the second service logic including causing a display of a first resource data amount and a second resource data amount, the first resource data amount and the second resource data amount corresponding to resource types in different regions, on the second conversation interface at the second terminal; ” in lines 10-14. Claim 1 (and similar for claims 8 and 15) recites the limitation “ executing a second service logic of the cross-regional resource transfer service corresponding to the second state; ” in lines 15-16. It seems these limitations have been arranged incorrectly, the “adjusting” step defines what the second service logic includes (displaying dual-currency amounts), but the ”executing” step is where the second service logic is actually executed. The “executing” step should occur first. Claim 7 (and similar for claim 14) recites “ wherein the request for the cross-regional resource transfer service is read from a blockchain; and the method further comprises: encapsulating a plurality of states of the state machine in the cross-regional resource transfer service, an execution result of the service logic corresponding to each of the states, and the service execution result of the cross-regional resource transfer service into a block; and storing the block to the blockchain. ” . There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Dependent claims 2-6, 9-13 and 16-20 do not overcome the deficiency of the base claim and, therefore, are rejected for the same reasons as the base claim. Double Patenting 08-33 AIA The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg , 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman , 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi , 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum , 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel , 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington , 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA. A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA/25, or PTO/AIA/26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. 08-34 AIA Claim s 1-12, 14-16 and 18-19 rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claim s 1-5, 7-11 and 14-17 of U.S. Patent No. 12,099,855 . Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because both of them share similar claim scope, managing request of a cross regional resource transfer between other resources and managing state machine . Instant Application US Pat. No. 12,099,855 1. A data processing method, performed by a computer device, the method comprising: receiving a request for a cross-regional resource transfer service submitted by a first user via a first conversation interface at a first terminal to a second user; setting a state machine of the cross-regional resource transfer service to a first state according to a state identifier in the request; executing a first service logic of the cross-regional resource transfer service corresponding to the first state, the first service logic comprises causing a display of a notification message indicating that a resource data packet is received by the second user on a second conversation interface at a second terminal; adjusting the state machine to a second state according to an execution result of the first service logic, the second service logic including causing a display of a first resource data amount and a second resource data amount, the first resource data amount and the second resource data amount corresponding to resource types in different regions, on the second conversation interface at the second terminal; executing a second service logic of the cross-regional resource transfer service corresponding to the second state; and returning a service execution result of the cross-regional resource transfer service to the first user at the first terminal and the second user at the second terminal according to an execution result of the second service logic when the second state is a termination state. 1. A data processing method, performed by a computer device, the method comprising: setting a state machine of a resource data transfer service to a first state in response to a start request for the resource data transfer service, the start request carrying a state identifier of the first state and the resource data transfer service comprises a cross-regional resource transfer-in service; executing a first service logic corresponding to the first state, to obtain an execution result of the first service logic, the first service logic comprises displaying, on a conversation interface, a notification message indicating that a resource data packet is received; adjusting the state machine to a second state according to the execution result of the first service logic, and executing a second service logic corresponding to the second state to obtain an execution result of the second service logic, the second service logic including displaying, on a resource acceptance interface, a user name of a user initiating the cross-regional resource transfer-in service, a first resource data amount and a second resource data amount, the first resource data amount and the second resource data amount corresponding to resource types in different regions; and outputting a service execution result of the resource data transfer service according to the execution result of the second service logic when the second state is a termination state, a service logic of the resource data transfer service comprising at least the first service logic and the second service logic. Claim 2 Claim 2 Claim 3 Claim 3 Claim 4 + Claim 5 Claim 4 Claim 6 Claim 5 Claim 7 Claim 7 8. A computer device, comprising a processor and a storage medium, the processor being configured to execute one or more instructions stored in the storage medium to perform a data processing method including: receiving a request for a cross-regional resource transfer service submitted by a first user via a first conversation interface at a first terminal to a second user; setting a state machine of the cross-regional resource transfer service to a first state according to a state identifier in the request; executing a first service logic of the cross-regional resource transfer service corresponding to the first state, the first service logic comprises causing a display of a notification message indicating that a resource data packet is received by the second user on a second conversation interface at a second terminal; adjusting the state machine to a second state according to an execution result of the first service logic, the second service logic including causing a display of a first resource data amount and a second resource data amount, the first resource data amount and the second resource data amount corresponding to resource types in different regions, on the second conversation interface at the second terminal; executing a second service logic of the cross-regional resource transfer service corresponding to the second state; and returning a service execution result of the cross-regional resource transfer service to the first user at the first terminal and the second user at the second terminal according to an execution result of the second service logic when the second state is a termination state. 8. A computer device, comprising an input device and an output device, a processor and a storage medium, the processor being configured to execute one or more instructions stored in the storage medium to perform a data processing method including: setting a state machine of a resource data transfer service to a first state in response to a start request for the resource data transfer service, the start request carrying a state identifier of the first state and the resource data transfer service comprises a cross-regional resource transfer-in service; executing a first service logic corresponding to the first state, to obtain an execution result of the first service logic, the first service logic comprises displaying, on a conversation interface, a notification message indicating that a resource data packet is received; adjusting the state machine to a second state according to the execution result of the first service logic, and executing a second service logic corresponding to the second state to obtain an execution result of the second service logic, the second service logic including displaying, on a resource acceptance interface, a user name of a user initiating the cross-regional resource transfer-in service, a first resource data amount and a second resource data amount, the first resource data amount and the second resource data amount corresponding to resource types in different regions; and outputting a service execution result of the resource data transfer service according to the execution result of the second service logic when the second state is a termination state, a service logic of the resource data transfer service comprising at least the first service logic and the second service logic. Claim 9 Claim 9 Claim 10 Claim 10 Claim 11 + Claim 12 Claim 11 Claim 14 Claim 14 15. A non-transitory computer storage medium, storing program instructions, and the program instructions, when executed by a processor of a computer device, causing the computer device to perform a data processing method including: receiving a request for a cross-regional resource transfer service submitted by a first user via a first conversation interface at a first terminal to a second user; setting a state machine of the cross-regional resource transfer service to a first state according to a state identifier in the request; executing a first service logic of the cross-regional resource transfer service corresponding to the first state, the first service logic comprises causing a display of a notification message indicating that a resource data packet is received by the second user on a second conversation interface at a second terminal; adjusting the state machine to a second state according to an execution result of the first service logic, the second service logic including causing a display of a first resource data amount and a second resource data amount, the first resource data amount and the second resource data amount corresponding to resource types in different regions, on the second conversation interface at the second terminal; executing a second service logic of the cross-regional resource transfer service corresponding to the second state; and returning a service execution result of the cross-regional resource transfer service to the first user at the first terminal and the second user at the second terminal according to an execution result of the second service logic when the second state is a termination state. 15. A non-transitory computer storage medium, storing program instructions, and the program instructions, when executed by a processor of a computer device, cause the computer device to perform a data processing method including: setting a state machine of a resource data transfer service to a first state in response to a start request for the resource data transfer service, the start request carrying a state identifier of the first state and the resource data transfer service comprises a cross-regional resource transfer-in service; executing a first service logic corresponding to the first state, to obtain an execution result of the first service logic, the first service logic comprises displaying, on a conversation interface, a notification message indicating that a resource data packet is received; adjusting the state machine to a second state according to the execution result of the first service logic, and executing a second service logic corresponding to the second state to obtain an execution result of the second service logic, the second service logic including displaying, on a resource acceptance interface, a user name of a user initiating the cross-regional resource transfer-in service, a first resource data amount and a second resource data amount, the first resource data amount and the second resource data amount corresponding to resource types in different regions; and outputting a service execution result of the resource data transfer service according to the execution result of the second service logic when the second state is a termination state, a service logic of the resource data transfer service comprising at least the first service logic and the second service logic. Claim 16 Claim 16 Claim 18 + Claim 19 Claim 17 Examiner Comments For claims 1-20, no art rejection is made for these claims. Claims were rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) and Double Patenting as explained above in this office action . Conclusion 07-96 AIA The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Gandhi (US Pub. No. 2014/0052633) discloses methods and systems for facilitating payments in a chat session are described. The methods include receiving instructions from a first user to configure a chat session to accept actionable text regarding payment, receiving the actionable text in a message entered by the first user to a second user, determining an action for the first user based on the actionable text, transmitting a request for the action to a second user, receiving approval of the request from the second user, and processing the payment. (see abstract) . Qing et al. (US Pub. No. 2020/0294009) provides blockchain-based state machine maintenance methods and apparatuses. In one implementation, the method includes: receiving, by a blockchain node, an operation transaction for a target electronic bill, wherein the blockchain node maintains a state machine corresponding to an electronic bill stored on a blockchain, wherein the state machine comprises multiple bill states in a life cycle of the electronic bill and operation data for triggering switching of the electronic bill from one bill state to another; in response to receiving the operation transaction, initiating a consensus process for the operation transaction; publishing consensus data related to the consensus process based on the operation transaction for the target electronic bill to the blockchain; determining monitored operation data matches the operation data in the state machine; and switching a bill state of the target electronic bill in the state machine based on the monitored operation data. (see abstract). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANIBAL RIVERACRUZ whose telephone number is (571)270-1200. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9:30 AM-6:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Hyung S Sough can be reached at 5712726799. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANIBAL RIVERACRUZ/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2192 Application/Control Number: 18/797,367 Page 2 Art Unit: 2192 Application/Control Number: 18/797,367 Page 3 Art Unit: 2192 Application/Control Number: 18/797,367 Page 4 Art Unit: 2192 Application/Control Number: 18/797,367 Page 5 Art Unit: 2192 Application/Control Number: 18/797,367 Page 6 Art Unit: 2192 Application/Control Number: 18/797,367 Page 7 Art Unit: 2192 Application/Control Number: 18/797,367 Page 8 Art Unit: 2192 Application/Control Number: 18/797,367 Page 9 Art Unit: 2192 Application/Control Number: 18/797,367 Page 10 Art Unit: 2192 Application/Control Number: 18/797,367 Page 11 Art Unit: 2192 Application/Control Number: 18/797,367 Page 12 Art Unit: 2192 Application/Control Number: 18/797,367 Page 13 Art Unit: 2192 Application/Control Number: 18/797,367 Page 14 Art Unit: 2192 Application/Control Number: 18/797,367 Page 15 Art Unit: 2192 Application/Control Number: 18/797,367 Page 16 Art Unit: 2192 Application/Control Number: 18/797,367 Page 17 Art Unit: 2192 Application/Control Number: 18/797,367 Page 18 Art Unit: 2192 Application/Control Number: 18/797,367 Page 19 Art Unit: 2192 Application/Control Number: 18/797,367 Page 20 Art Unit: 2192 Application/Control Number: 18/797,367 Page 21 Art Unit: 2192 Application/Control Number: 18/797,367 Page 22 Art Unit: 2192
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 07, 2024
Application Filed
May 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112, §DOUBLEPATENT (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12705049
OPTIMIZING TELEMETRY VOLUME
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12705046
DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATIONS SERVER WITH CODE MAPPING MODULE
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12693957
ACCESSIBILITY VERIFICATION TESTING
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12688033
AUTOMATICALLY RESOLVING MERGE CONFLICTS IN A COMPUTER SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12681777
SOFTWARE DEFINED RANDOMIZATION FOR THE MITIGATION OF UNKNOWN VULNERABILITIES
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+12.0%)
2y 3m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 758 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month