Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/798,913

WIPER CONTROL DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Aug 09, 2024
Examiner
ALCORN III, GEORGE A
Art Unit
3662
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
DENSO CORPORATION
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 7m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allow Rate
36 granted / 58 resolved
+10.1% vs TC avg
Strong +32% interview lift
Without
With
+31.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
81
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
24.1%
-15.9% vs TC avg
§103
56.5%
+16.5% vs TC avg
§102
6.9%
-33.1% vs TC avg
§112
10.3%
-29.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 58 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Interpretation The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(f): (f) Element in Claim for a Combination. – An element in a claim for a combination may be expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof, and such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph: An element in a claim for a combination may be expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof, and such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof. The claims in this application are given their broadest reasonable interpretation using the plain meaning of the claim language in light of the specification as it would be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art. The broadest reasonable interpretation of a claim element (also commonly referred to as a claim limitation) is limited by the description in the specification when 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, is invoked. As explained in MPEP § 2181, subsection I, claim limitations that meet the following three-prong test will be interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph: (A) the claim limitation uses the term “means” or “step” or a term used as a substitute for “means” that is a generic placeholder (also called a nonce term or a non-structural term having no specific structural meaning) for performing the claimed function; (B) the term “means” or “step” or the generic placeholder is modified by functional language, typically, but not always linked by the transition word “for” (e.g., “means for”) or another linking word or phrase, such as “configured to” or “so that”; and (C) the term “means” or “step” or the generic placeholder is not modified by sufficient structure, material, or acts for performing the claimed function. Use of the word “means” (or “step”) in a claim with functional language creates a rebuttable presumption that the claim limitation is to be treated in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph. The presumption that the claim limitation is interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, is rebutted when the claim limitation recites sufficient structure, material, or acts to entirely perform the recited function. Absence of the word “means” (or “step”) in a claim creates a rebuttable presumption that the claim limitation is not to be treated in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph. The presumption that the claim limitation is not interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, is rebutted when the claim limitation recites function without reciting sufficient structure, material or acts to entirely perform the recited function. Claim limitations in this application that use the word “means” (or “step”) are being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, except as otherwise indicated in an Office action. Conversely, claim limitations in this application that do not use the word “means” (or “step”) are not being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, except as otherwise indicated in an Office action. This application includes one or more claim limitations that do not use the word “means,” but are nonetheless being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, because the claim limitation(s) uses a generic placeholder that is coupled with functional language without reciting sufficient structure to perform the recited function and the generic placeholder is not preceded by a structural modifier. Such claim limitation(s) is/are: “acquisition unit”, “estimation unit”, and “drive unit” in claims 1-4. Because this/these claim limitation(s) is/are being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, it/they is/are being interpreted to cover the corresponding structure described in the specification as performing the claimed function, and equivalents thereof. If applicant does not intend to have this/these limitation(s) interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, applicant may: (1) amend the claim limitation(s) to avoid it/them being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph (e.g., by reciting sufficient structure to perform the claimed function); or (2) present a sufficient showing that the claim limitation(s) recite(s) sufficient structure to perform the claimed function so as to avoid it/them being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph. Accompanying structure for the acquisition, estimation, and drive units can be found in paragraph [0098] of the specification. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The term “just before” in claims 1-4 is a relative term which renders the claims indefinite. The term “just before” is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree beyond paragraph [0041] of the specification, which states ““Δ” is, for example, 1 to 10 degrees”, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. The angle difference between the first or second position and a position where the first and second elements are turned off and on is rendered indefinite by the use of “just before”. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim 1-4 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Suriano et al. (US 5654616 A) in view of Byun (KR 20210146098 A). Regarding claim 1, Suriano teach A wiper control device (see at least FIG. 1: windshield wiper device 10) comprising: an acquisition unit (see at least FIG. 7: common brush 36) configured to acquire a value (see at least (3) column 2 lines 54-55: “An application of 12 volts across the common brush 36”) related to a current flowing through a wiper motor (see at least FIG. 7: motor 30) that drives a wiper (see at least FIG. 1: wiper arm 16) configured to reciprocate between a first position (see at least FIG. 1: second end wipe position B; FIG. 4B: right side of region P3) and a second position (see at least FIG. 1: FIG. 4B left side of region P2); a drive unit (see at least FIG. 2: rotary switch 40) configured to reduce an electric power supplied (see at least FIG. 4B, (10)-(11) column 4 lines 5-33: Moving clockwise, when the wiper enters region P2, sliding contact 56 contacts plate 44, which routes current to low speed brush 34. When the wiper reaches the end of region P2, sliding contact 60 disconnects with plate 44, which disconnects current from high speed brush 32.; (11) column 4 lines 24-27: “Further rotation of the wiper arm 16 toward the end wipe position causes the arm to enter region P3 where the motor 30 operates at low speed.”) to the wiper motor when a position of the wiper is just before (FIG. 4B: region P2) the first position or when the position of the wiper is just before the second position. However, Suriano does not explicitly teach an acquisition unit *Examiner’s interpretation: as interpreted under 112(f) to comprise a computer or processor.*, an estimation unit configured to estimate a wiper angle, which is a rotation angle of the wiper, based on a current ripple in the current flowing through the wiper motor, the current ripple having a periodicity corresponding to driving of the wiper motor; a drive unit *Examiner’s interpretation: as interpreted under 112(f) to comprise a computer or processor.*. Byun teach an acquisition unit (see at least FIG. 2: motor control unit 200; [0037]: “motor control unit … may include a high pass filter … for converging the average voltage of the ripple waveform …, a counting unit …, … and a microcomputer … for controlling them.”; [0041]: “motor control unit … may further include a wire … for sensing a ripple waveform from the motor”); an estimation unit configured to estimate a wiper angle (see at least [0010]: “a motor control unit that calculates the rotational speed of the motor based on the number of ripple waveforms corresponding to the voltage between the high relay brush and the ground brush during the low relay section and the number of commutators, and derives the position of the wiper based on the rotational speed of the motor.”; [0064]: “Based on the rotation speed of the motor, the position of the wiper, or more precisely, the angle of the wiper, can be derived.”), which is a rotation angle of the wiper, based on a current ripple in the current flowing through the wiper motor, the current ripple having a periodicity (see at least [0064]: “If the number of commutators (110) is A and the number of rotations of the wiper motor per one rotation of the wiper is B, the number of ripple waveforms generated during one rotation of the wiper motor is A*B. In steps S540 and S560, the microcomputer (230) can calculate the number of rotations of the motor during the low relay period or the high relay period by dividing the number of ripple waveforms output during the low relay period or the high relay period by A.”) corresponding to driving of the wiper motor; a drive unit (see at least FIG. 2: motor control unit; [0056]: “The motor control unit (200) can supply power”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Suriano to incorporate the teachings of Byun to calculate a wiper angle based on motor current ripple. Doing so would result in “a vehicle wiper control system and wiper control method capable of accurately determining the position of a wiper without increasing cost”, as recognized by Byun in paragraph [0006]. Regarding claim 2, the combination of Suriano and Byun teach The wiper control device according to claim 1. Suriano further teaches further comprising a drive element (see at least FIG. 7: third sliding contact 60) configured to cause the current to flow through the wiper motor to rotate the wiper motor when the drive element is turned on (see at least (10) column 4 lines 6-8: “the motor 30 rotates at high speed when only the second and third sliding contacts 58 and 60 contact the conductive plate 44.”), wherein the drive unit is configured to reduce the electric power supplied (see at least FIG. 4B, (10)-(11) column 4 lines 5-33: Moving clockwise, when the wiper enters region P2, sliding contact 56 contacts plate 44, which routes current to low speed brush 34. When the wiper reaches the end of region P2, sliding contact 60 disconnects with plate 44, which disconnects current from high speed brush 32.; (11) column 4 lines 24-27: “Further rotation of the wiper arm 16 toward the end wipe position causes the arm to enter region P3 where the motor 30 operates at low speed.”) to the wiper motor by turning the drive element on and off when the position of the wiper is just before (see at least FIG. 4B: region P2) the first position or when the position of the wiper is just before the second position. Regarding claim 3, Suriano teach A wiper control device (see at least FIG. 1: windshield wiper device 10) comprising: an acquisition unit (see at least FIG. 7: common brush 36) configured to acquire a value (see at least (3) column 2 lines 54-55: “An application of 12 volts across the common brush 36”) related to a current flowing through a wiper motor (see at least FIG. 7: motor 30) that drives a wiper (see at least FIG. 1: wiper arm 16) configured to reciprocate between a first position (see at least FIG. 1: second end wipe position B; FIG. 4B: right side of region P3) and a second position (see at least FIG. 1: FIG. 4B left side of region P2) and that includes a first terminal (see at least FIG. 7: high speed brush 32) to which an electric power is supplied (see at least (6) column 3 lines 34-38: “A positive terminal 70 of the battery 64 is electrically connected to the high speed brush 32 …. A third conductor 76 extends from the positive terminal 70 to the low speed brush 34”; (16) column 5 lines 24-26: “all speed changes are made with at least one of the high speed and low speed brushes being continually energized.”) to rotate (see at least (7) column 1 lines 40-42: “The wiper am is adapted to be rotatably mounted on a vehicle body for operable movement”) the wiper motor at a first speed (see at least (3) column 2 lines 54-61: “Applying 12 volts across … the high speed brush 32 would result in the wiper arms 16 cycling at a second rate of speed higher than the first rate of speed.”) and a second terminal (see at least FIG. 7: low speed brush 34) to which an electric power is supplied to rotate the wiper motor at a second speed (see at least (3) column 2 lines 54-61: “An application of 12 volts across … the low speed brush 34 would result in the windshield wiper arm 16 cycling … at a first rate of speed.”) slower than the first speed; a first element (see at least FIG. 7: third sliding contact 60) configured to cause the current to flow through the wiper motor via the first terminal to rotate the wiper motor when the first element is turned on (see at least (10) column 4 lines 6-8: “the motor 30 rotates at high speed when only the second and third sliding contacts 58 and 60 contact the conductive plate 44.”); a second element (see at least FIG. 7: first sliding contact 56) configured to cause the current to flow through the wiper motor via the second terminal to rotate the wiper motor when the second element is turned on (see at least (10) column 4 lines 8-10: “When only the first and second sliding contacts 56 and 58 contact the conductive plate 44, the motor 30 operates at low speed.”); and a drive unit (see at least FIG. 2: rotary switch 40) configured to turn on or off the first element and the second element, wherein the drive unit is further configured to turn the first element from on to off to stop supply of the electric power to the first terminal and turn the second element from off to on to supply the electric power to the second terminal (see at least FIG. 4B, (10)-(11) column 4 lines 5-33: Moving clockwise, when the wiper enters region P2, sliding contact 56 contacts plate 44, which routes current to low speed brush 34. When the wiper reaches the end of region P2, sliding contact 60 disconnects with plate 44, which disconnects current from high speed brush 32.; (11) column 4 lines 24-27: “Further rotation of the wiper arm 16 toward the end wipe position causes the arm to enter region P3 where the motor 30 operates at low speed.”) (i) when the first element is on (see at least FIG. 4B, (11) column 4 lines 20-21: “the motor 30 operating at high speed in the region indicating by P1.”) and (ii) when a position of the wiper is just before (see at least FIG. 4B: region P2) the first position or when the position of the wiper is just before the second position, and turn the first element from off to on to supply the electric power to the first terminal and turn the second element from on to off to stop the supply of the electric power to the second terminal when the position of the wiper changes from just before the first position to the first position or when the position of the wiper changes (see at least (11) column 4 lines 27-29: “As the eccentric driver 28 passes over center at the end wipe position and the blade 12 reverses direction, the above described sequence is reversed.”; FIG. 4B, (10)-(11) column 4 lines 5-33: Moving counterclockwise from the right side of region P3, when the wiper enters region P2, sliding contact 60 contacts plate 44, which routes current to the high speed brush 34. When the wiper reaches the end of region P2, sliding contact 56 disconnects with plate 44, which disconnects current from low speed brush 34.) from just before (see at least FIG. 4B: region P2) the second position to the second position (see at least FIG. 1: FIG. 4B left side of region P2). However, Suriano does not explicitly teach an acquisition unit *Examiner’s interpretation: as interpreted under 112(f) to comprise a computer or processor.*, an estimation unit configured to estimate a wiper angle, which is a rotation angle of the wiper, based on a current ripple in the current flowing through the wiper motor, the current ripple having a periodicity corresponding to driving of the wiper motor; a drive unit *Examiner’s interpretation: as interpreted under 112(f) to comprise a computer or processor.*. Byun teach an acquisition unit (see at least FIG. 2: motor control unit 200; [0037]: “motor control unit … may include a high pass filter … for converging the average voltage of the ripple waveform …, a counting unit …, … and a microcomputer … for controlling them.”; [0041]: “motor control unit … may further include a wire … for sensing a ripple waveform from the motor”); an estimation unit configured to estimate a wiper angle (see at least [0010]: “a motor control unit that calculates the rotational speed of the motor based on the number of ripple waveforms corresponding to the voltage between the high relay brush and the ground brush during the low relay section and the number of commutators, and derives the position of the wiper based on the rotational speed of the motor.”; [0064]: “Based on the rotation speed of the motor, the position of the wiper, or more precisely, the angle of the wiper, can be derived.”), which is a rotation angle of the wiper, based on a current ripple in the current flowing through the wiper motor, the current ripple having a periodicity (see at least [0064]: “If the number of commutators (110) is A and the number of rotations of the wiper motor per one rotation of the wiper is B, the number of ripple waveforms generated during one rotation of the wiper motor is A*B. In steps S540 and S560, the microcomputer (230) can calculate the number of rotations of the motor during the low relay period or the high relay period by dividing the number of ripple waveforms output during the low relay period or the high relay period by A.”) corresponding to driving of the wiper motor; a drive unit (see at least FIG. 2: motor control unit; [0056]: “The motor control unit (200) can supply power”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Suriano to incorporate the teachings of Byun to calculate a wiper angle based on motor current ripple. Doing so would result in “a vehicle wiper control system and wiper control method capable of accurately determining the position of a wiper without increasing cost”, as recognized by Byun in paragraph [0006]. Regarding claim 4, Suriano teach A wiper control device (see at least FIG. 1: windshield wiper device 10) comprising: an acquisition unit (see at least FIG. 7: common brush 36) configured to acquire a value (see at least (3) column 2 lines 54-55: “An application of 12 volts across the common brush 36”) related to a current flowing through a wiper motor (see at least FIG. 7: motor 30) that drives a wiper (see at least FIG. 1: wiper arm 16) configured to reciprocate between a first position (see at least FIG. 4B: bottom left side or wiper range) and a second position (see at least FIG. 4B left side of region P2) and that includes a first terminal (see at least FIG. 8: jumper wire 101) to which an electric power is supplied (see at least FIG. 8, (1) column 4 lines 59-60: “The system operates in the second soft mode when switch 74 is closed, 78 is open, and 86 is closed.”; FIG. 8: in second soft mode, when sliding contacts 92 and 94 are both contacting conductive disk, power routes from positive terminal 70 to low speed brush 34 through route: terminal 70 [Wingdings font/0xE0] first selective switch 74 [Wingdings font/0xE0] fourth selective switch 86 [Wingdings font/0xE0] fifth conductor 84 [Wingdings font/0xE0] sliding contact 92 [Wingdings font/0xE0] sections 98 and 100 [Wingdings font/0xE0] sliding contact 94 [Wingdings font/0xE0] jumper wire 101 [Wingdings font/0xE0] third conductor 76 [Wingdings font/0xE0] low speed brush 34; power routes from positive terminal 70 to high speed brush 32 through route: terminal 70 [Wingdings font/0xE0] switch 74 [Wingdings font/0xE0] conductor 72 [Wingdings font/0xE0] high speed brush 32) to rotate (see at least (7) column 1 lines 40-42: “The wiper arm is adapted to be rotatably mounted on a vehicle body for operable movement”) the wiper motor at a first speed (see at least (3) column 2 lines 61-64: “Applying 12 volts across both the high speed brush 32 and low speed brush 34 relative to the common brush 36 would result in a intermediate speed between the high speed and low speed cycles of the wiper arm 16.”) and a second terminal (see at least FIG. 7: low speed brush 34) to which an electric power is supplied to rotate the wiper motor at a second speed (see at least (3) column 2 lines 54-61: “An application of 12 volts across … the low speed brush 34 would result in the windshield wiper arm 16 cycling … at a first rate of speed.”) slower than the first speed *Examiner’s interpretation: When circuit 90 of FIG. 8 is configured in second soft mode, intermediate speed is achieved when jumper wire 101 is electrified, which electrifies the high and low speed brushes. If circuit 90 was configured with switch 78 closed and switches 74 and 86 open, power would be supplied to low speed brush only, rotating the motor at low speed.*; a first element (see at least FIG. 8: sliding contact 92) configured to cause the current to flow through the wiper motor via the first terminal to rotate the wiper motor when the first element is turned on (see at least FIG. 8: when sliding contact 92 contacts disk 98 and 100, power routes from sliding contact 92 through jumper wire 101 to brushes 32 and 34 to rotate motor at intermediate speed); a second element (see at least FIG. 8: switch 78) configured to cause the current to flow through the wiper motor via the second terminal to rotate the wiper motor when the second element is turned on *Examiner’s interpretation: if switch 78 of circuit 90 is closed, low speed brush is energized.*; and a drive unit (see at least FIG. 2: rotary switch 40) configured to turn on or off the first element and the second element, wherein the drive unit is further configured to turn the first element from on to off (see at least FIG. 8: sliding contact 92 disconnects from conductive disk 98 / 100, severing power flow through jumper wire 101) to stop supply of the electric power to the first terminal and keep the second element off (see at least FIG. 8, (1) column 4 lines 59-60: “78 is open”) (i) when the first element is on (see at least FIG. 4B: under 2nd soft mode, wiper is traveling at intermediate speed in regions P2 and P3) and (ii) when a position of the wiper is just before (see at least FIG. 4B: traveling counterclockwise, wiper changes from intermediate speed to high speed as it enters P1) the first position (see at least FIG. 4B: bottom left side or wiper range) or when the position of the wiper is just before the second position, and turn the first element from off to on (see at least FIG. 8: sliding contact 92 contacts conductive disk 98 / 100, routing power through jumper wire 101) to supply the electric power to the first terminal and keep the second element off (see at least FIG. 8, (1) column 4 lines 59-60: “78 is open”) when the position of the wiper changes from just before the first position to the first position or when the position of the wiper changes from (see at least FIG. 4B: moving clockwise wiper changes from high speed to intermediate speed when entering P2 from P1) just before the second position (see at least FIG. 4B: region P1) to the second position (see at least FIG. 4B left side of region P2). However, Suriano does not explicitly teach an acquisition unit *Examiner’s interpretation: as interpreted under 112(f) to comprise a computer or processor.*, an estimation unit configured to estimate a wiper angle, which is a rotation angle of the wiper, based on a current ripple in the current flowing through the wiper motor, the current ripple having a periodicity corresponding to driving of the wiper motor; a drive unit *Examiner’s interpretation: as interpreted under 112(f) to comprise a computer or processor.*. Byun teach an acquisition unit (see at least FIG. 2: motor control unit 200; [0037]: “motor control unit … may include a high pass filter … for converging the average voltage of the ripple waveform …, a counting unit …, … and a microcomputer … for controlling them.”; [0041]: “motor control unit … may further include a wire … for sensing a ripple waveform from the motor”); an estimation unit configured to estimate a wiper angle (see at least [0010]: “a motor control unit that calculates the rotational speed of the motor based on the number of ripple waveforms corresponding to the voltage between the high relay brush and the ground brush during the low relay section and the number of commutators, and derives the position of the wiper based on the rotational speed of the motor.”; [0064]: “Based on the rotation speed of the motor, the position of the wiper, or more precisely, the angle of the wiper, can be derived.”), which is a rotation angle of the wiper, based on a current ripple in the current flowing through the wiper motor, the current ripple having a periodicity (see at least [0064]: “If the number of commutators (110) is A and the number of rotations of the wiper motor per one rotation of the wiper is B, the number of ripple waveforms generated during one rotation of the wiper motor is A*B. In steps S540 and S560, the microcomputer (230) can calculate the number of rotations of the motor during the low relay period or the high relay period by dividing the number of ripple waveforms output during the low relay period or the high relay period by A.”) corresponding to driving of the wiper motor; a drive unit (see at least FIG. 2: motor control unit; [0056]: “The motor control unit (200) can supply power”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Suriano to incorporate the teachings of Byun to calculate a wiper angle based on motor current ripple. Doing so would result in “a vehicle wiper control system and wiper control method capable of accurately determining the position of a wiper without increasing cost”, as recognized by Byun in paragraph [0006]. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. McCann et al. (US 5506483 A) teaches a windshield wiper system that slows the wiper when it is within five degrees from a reversal point (see (5) column 1 lines 37-39 and (9) column 3 lines 35-40). Forhan (US 5355061 A) teaches a wiper system that slows down a wiper as is approaches a transition point (see (17) column 5 lines 19-32). Harris et al. (US 6393653 B1) teaches a wiper system that “provide[s] an energy absorption apparatus for minimizing wiper pattern expansion” (see (11) column 2 lines 2-3). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GEORGE ALCORN whose telephone number is (571) 270-3763. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 9:30 am – 6:30 pm est. Examiner Interview are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jelani Smith can be reached at (571) 270-3415. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GEORGE A ALCORN III/Examiner, Art Unit 3662 /JELANI A SMITH/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3662
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 09, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112
Mar 11, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 11, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12583478
AUTONOMOUS DRIVING VEHICLE DETECTION METHOD AND APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12559128
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR UPDATING THE PARAMETERS OF A MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROLLER WITH LEARNED OPERATIONAL AND VEHICLE PARAMETERS GENERATED USING SIMULATIONS AND MACHINE LEARNING
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12559142
METHOD FOR OPERATING A SELF-DRIVING VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12552381
Target of Interest Selection on Roadway Ramps for Avoidance Driving Maneuvers
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12552385
METHOD FOR CONTROLLING A TORQUE OF AT LEAST ONE WHEEL USING A TRAINED RADIAL BASIS FUNCTION NETWORK
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+31.8%)
3y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 58 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month