Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/800,733

DISPLAY PANEL AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING THE DISPLAY PANEL

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 12, 2024
Priority
Sep 22, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0127107
Examiner
RAABE, CHRISTOPHER M
Art Unit
2875
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allowance Rate
550 granted / 813 resolved
At TC average
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+27.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
830
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
81.2%
+41.2% vs TC avg
§102
16.4%
-23.6% vs TC avg
§112
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 813 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 5, 7-11, 14-16, 25-28 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Jeong et al. (USPN 2018/0090698). With regard to claim 1, Jeong et al. disclose in figs 1-3 a display panel comprising: a substrate (100 or 100/200) comprising: a first portion (1A) having a first thickness (t1 or t1 + 200), and a second portion (BA1) adjacent to the first portion in a first direction and having a second thickness (t2) smaller than the first thickness (see fig. 24E); a circuit layer (120) disposed on the substrate; and an element layer (300) disposed on the circuit layer, wherein a plurality of slit grooves extending along a second direction crossing the first direction and recessed in a thickness direction of the substrate are defined on a bottom surface of the first portion of the substrate (See figs. 2, 24E). With regard to claim 2, Jeong et al. disclose the display panel of claim 1, wherein a width of the substrate in the second direction is substantially equal to lengths of the plurality of slit grooves in the second direction (see fig. 2). With regard to claim 3, Jeong et al. disclose the display panel of claim 1, wherein a depth of each of the plurality of slit grooves is substantially equal to a difference between the first thickness (t1) and the second thickness (t2, see figs. 3, 24E). With regard to 5, Jeong et al. disclose the display panel of claim 1, wherein a depth of each of the plurality of slit grooves is smaller than a difference between the first thickness (t1 + 200) and the second thickness (t2). With regard to claim 7, Jeong et al. disclose the display panel of claim 1, wherein each of the plurality of slit grooves has a shape recessed from a lower surface of the substrate toward an upper surface of the substrate, and the upper surface of the substrate continuously extends from the first portion and the second portion to define a plane including the first portion and the second portion (See figs. 1-3, 24E). With regard to claim 8, Jeong et al. disclose the display panel of claim 7, wherein the lower surface of the substrate (100) comprises a first lower surface overlapping the first portion and a second lower surface overlapping the second portion, and a boundary surface connecting the first lower surface and the second lower surface is a flat surface (See figs.1-3, 17). With regard to claim 9, Jeong et al. disclose the display panel of claim 7, wherein the lower surface of the substrate comprises a first lower surface overlapping the first portion and a second lower surface overlapping the second portion, and a boundary surface connecting the first lower surface and the second lower surface is a curved surface (see figs. 1-3,24E). With regard to claim 10, Jeong et al. disclose the display panel of claim 1, further comprising: a plurality of filling members (920, fig 24D, see paragraph 185) disposed in the plurality of slit grooves, respectively. With regard to claim 11, Jeong et al. disclose the display panel of claim 10, wherein each of the plurality of slit grooves has a shape that is recessed from a lower surface of the substrate toward an upper surface of the substrate, and each of the plurality of filling members is aligned with the lower surface of the substrate (See fig. 24D). With regard to claim 14, Jeong et al. disclose the display panel of claim 10, further comprising: a cover layer (910) provided integrally with the plurality of filling members, and covering a lower surface of the first portion of the substrate (see paragraph 183). With regard to claim 15, Jeong et al. disclose the display panel of claim 1, wherein a shape of each of the plurality of slit grooves on a cross-section is defined by a first line, a straight line connected to the first line, and a second line connected to the straight line (See fig. 17). With regard to claim 16, Jeong et al. disclose the display panel of claim 1, wherein a shape of each of the plurality of slit grooves on a cross-section is defined by a first line, a curved line connected to the first line, and a second line connected to the curved line (see fig. 24E). With regard to claim 25, Jeong et al. disclose a display panel comprising: a substrate (100 or 100/200) comprising: a first portion (BA1), and a second portion (1A) adjacent to the first portion in a first direction; a circuit layer (120) disposed on the substrate; and an element layer (300) disposed on the circuit layer and overlapping the second portion, wherein the first portion comprises: a plurality of first sub portions having a first thickness (t2), and a plurality of second sub portions having a second thickness (t1) smaller than the first thickness (see figs. 1-3), wherein the plurality of first sub portions and the plurality of second sub portions are repeatedly alternately arranged one by one in the first direction (see figs1-3). With regard to claim 26, Jeong et al. disclose the display panel of claim 25, wherein a thickness (t1) of the second portion (1A of 100) is smaller than the first thickness (t1). With regard to claim 27, Jeong et al. disclose the display panel of claim 26, wherein the thickness of the second portion (1A of 100/200) is larger than the second thickness (t1), or is smaller than the second thickness. With regard to claim 28, Jeong et al. disclose the display panel of claim 25, further comprising: a filling member (900) disposed between two adjacent first portions of the plurality of first sub portions. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jeong et al. (as above), in view of Yun et al. (USPN 2022/0190264). With regard to claim 6, Jeong et al. disclose the display panel of claim 1. While Jeong et al. do not specify the relative thicknesses, Yun et al. do disclose an analogous display wherein the first thickness is five times or greater than the second thickness (See paragraph 115). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to try to incorporate this concept of Yun et al. into the panel of Jeong in order to try to balance flexibility and strength. Claim 17 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jeong et al. (as above), in view of Kim et al. (USPN 2019/0208650). With regard to claim 17, Jeong et al. disclose the display panel of claim 1. While Jeong et al. do not disclose a glass substrate, Kim et al. do disclose wherein the substrate is a flexible glass substrate (see paragraph 68). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to incorporate this concept of Kim et al. into the panel of Jeong et al. in order to reduce permeability of the substrate. Claims 18-24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim et al. (as above), in view of Choi et al. (USPN 2022/0269312) and Jeong et al. (as above). With regard to claim 18, Kim et al. disclose an electronic device comprising: a rotation part (160); a display panel (150) coupled to the rotation part, the display panel comprising: a substrate (GLS) comprising a first portion (GLS2) having a first thickness (see fig. 5) and a second portion (GLS1) adjacent to the first portion in a first direction and having a second thickness, a circuit layer (See figs. 1,2, paragraphs 52-54) disposed on the substrate, and an element layer (SP, see paragraphs 52-54) disposed on the circuit layer. While Kim et al. do not disclose the rotation part disposed in a housing with a slot, or a plurality of slit grooves extending along a second direction crossing the first direction and recessed in a thickness direction of the substrate are defined on a bottom surface of the first portion of the substrate, Choi et al. does disclose a housing (HS) in which a slot (OP) is formed having a display panel (DM) and rotation part (ROL) therein. It would have bee obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art the time of the invention to incorporate this concept of Choi et al. in to the device of Kim et al. in order to protect the display and rotation components. Additionally, Jeong et al. disclose a plurality of slit grooves (See fig. 2, 24E) extending along a second direction crossing the first direction and recessed in a thickness direction of the substrate are defined on a bottom surface of the first portion (BA1) of the substrate. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to incorporate this concept of Jeong et al. in to the device of Kim et al. in order to facilitate bending in the desired direction. With regard to claim 19, Kim et al. The electronic device of claim 18, wherein the display panel further comprises a first surface (AA), on which an image is displayed, and a second surface (opposite) opposed to the first surface, and a portion of the first surface of the display panel is coupled to the rotation part. (see figs. 10,11). With regard to claim 20, Kim et al. disclose the electronic device of claim 18, wherein the display panel further comprises a first surface (AA), on which an image is displayed, and a second surface (opposite) opposed to the first surface, and a portion of the second surface of the display panel is coupled to the rotation part (see figs. 10, 11). With regard to claim 21, Kim et al. disclose the electronic device of claim 18, further comprising: a connection film (145) electrically connected to the display panel (150) and attached to an area overlapping the first portion (GLS2); and a circuit substrate (125) electrically connected to the connection film and seated on the rotation part (see figs. 8, 11). With regard to claim 22, Kim et al. disclose the electronic device of claim 21, further comprising: a seating space (in 160) defined in the rotation part and recessed from an outer peripheral surface (See figs. 11), on which the display panel (150) is wound, wherein the circuit substrate (125) is disposed in the seating space (See figs. 11). With regard to claim 23, Kim et al. disclose the electronic device of claim 21, further comprising: a circuit substrate fixing part disposed in a space defined in the rotation part, wherein the circuit substrate (125) is fixed to the circuit substrate fixing part, and the circuit substrate fixing part is fixed to the rotation part (see paragraph 86). With regard to claim 24, Jeong et al. disclose the electronic device of claim 18, wherein the display panel further comprises a plurality of filling members (195) disposed in the plurality of slit grooves, respectively. The obviousness of the incorporation of the concept of Jeong et al. into the device of Kim et al. was addressed in the rejection of claim 18. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4, 12, 13 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: the prior art fails to disclose or render obvious in combination with the other limitations of the claims, a depth of each of the plurality of slit grooves is greater than a difference between the first thickness and the second thickness, or each of the plurality of filling members has a shape recessed concavely or protruding convexly from the lower surface of the substrate. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. USPN 2023/0301148, 2022/0199943, 2021/0343984, 2020/0152904, 2020/0105168. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Christopher Raabe whose telephone number is (571)272-8434. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 0530-1430. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, James R Greece can be reached at (571)272-3711. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER M RAABE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2875 /JAMES R GREECE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2875
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 12, 2024
Application Filed
May 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12641979
DISPLAY SUBSTRATE AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 10m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12635348
DISPLAY APPARATUS HAVING A LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE
2y 8m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12635353
DISPLAY APPARATUS AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 9m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12628495
LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE AND DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 8m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12622159
DISPLAY DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS
2y 8m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+27.9%)
2y 8m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 813 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month