Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/806,005

BRAKE ACTUATOR UNIT AND ELECTROMECHANICAL BRAKE

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Aug 15, 2024
Priority
Aug 16, 2023 — DE 102023121911.1
Examiner
TAYLOR II, JAMES JOSEPH
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
ZF Friedrichshafen AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
315 granted / 379 resolved
+23.1% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+25.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 9m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
391
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
37.8%
-2.2% vs TC avg
§102
29.5%
-10.5% vs TC avg
§112
31.0%
-9.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 379 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED CORRESPONDENCE Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims This is the first Office Action on the merits for application no. 18/806,005 filed on August 15th, 2024. Claims 1-14 are pending. Priority Examiner acknowledges the Applicant’s claim to priority of application DE 10 2023 121 911.1 filed on August 16th, 2023. A certified copy was received on March 7th, 2023. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on August 15th, 2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement was considered by the Examiner. Claim Objections Regarding Claim 8 (line 3), please change the recitation of “an electric motor and by the gearing mechanism” to - - an electric motor and by [[the]] a gearing mechanism - - to establish antecedent basis. Regarding Claim 9 (line 3), please change the recitation of “having a brake actuator unit according to Claim 1” to - - having [[a]] the brake actuator unit according to Claim 1 - - as antecedent basis has already been established in claim 1. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. Regarding Claim 1, in the recitation of “wherein the brake housing has a brake calliper” the difference between the “brake housing” recited in claim 1 and the “calliper” recited in claim 1 is unclear. The lack of clarity renders the claim indefinite. Applicant could recite “wherein the brake housing [[has]] is a brake calliper” to clarify the recitation and Examiner will interpret the recitation as such during examination. See MPEP 2173.05(o) – Double Inclusion. Claims 2-14 are rejected based upon their dependency to a rejected base claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office Action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Sakashita (US 10,626,941). Regarding Claim 1, Sakashita teaches a brake actuator unit (see Fig. 8) for an electromechanical disc brake (“disc brake” 1c), comprising: a brake housing (“caliper” 4), a spindle (“spindle rod” 80), a brake piston (“piston” 18), which is drive-coupled to the spindle (80) and is axially movable by the spindle (80), and an axial spindle bearing (“first thrust bearing” 110 and “ring-shaped base plate” 100), which receives the spindle (80) and absorbs the axial reaction forces of the spindle (80) when the brake is applied (see Fig. 8), wherein the brake housing (housing portion of 4) has a brake calliper (4; see 112(b) rejection above) having a pad support portion (“claw portion” 8) and a pot-shaped brake piston bearing portion (“cylinder” 15), which is integrally connected to the pad support portion (8) and has an axially extending circumferential wall (“opening” 9a and “opening” 9b) and a bottom (“bottom wall” 11), which extends radially inwards from the circumferential wall (9a, 9b) and through which the spindle (80) runs, wherein, when the brake is operated, the spindle bearing (110, 100) is supported axially on the bottom (11), and the circumferential wall (9a, 9b) forms, on its radial inner side (radial inner side of 9a, 9b), a sliding guide face (9a of 9a, 9b) for the brake piston (18) so that the brake piston (18) bears at least in some portions against the inner side (see Fig. 8). Regarding Claim 2, Sakashita teaches the brake actuator unit according to claim 1, wherein that the brake housing (Fig. 8, 4) is designed as a single piece (see Fig. 8). Regarding Claim 3, Sakashita teaches the brake actuator unit according to claim 1, wherein the brake actuator unit has a gear module (Fig. 8, “planetary gear speed reducer” 45 and “housing” 35), which is drive-coupled to the spindle (80) and has a gear housing (35) that is fastened directly to the brake calliper (4; see Fig. 8). Regarding Claim 4, Sakashita teaches the brake actuator unit according to claim 3, wherein the gear housing (Fig. 8, 35) is an outer housing (35) of the gear module (45, 35). Regarding Claim 5, Sakashita teaches the brake actuator unit according to claim 3, wherein the gear housing (Fig. 8, 35) is designed as a single piece (see Fig. 8). Regarding Claim 6, Sakashita teaches the brake actuator unit according to claim 3, wherein the gear housing (Fig. 8, 35) has a centring hole (portion of 35 for receiving 11), which runs coaxially with a centring collar (collar portion of 11) of the brake calliper (4) and is connected thereto (see Fig. 8). Regarding Claim 7, Sakashita teaches the brake actuator unit according to claim 3, wherein the gear module (Fig. 8, 45, 35) has a ring gear (“internal gear” 61), which is mounted by a press fit in a receptacle in the gear housing (35; col. 5, line 6 – “internal gear 61 is press-fitted in and fixed to the housing 35”), wherein the ring gear (61) is part of a gearing mechanism (45) that is drive-connected to the spindle (80). Regarding Claim 8, Sakashita teaches the brake actuator unit according to claim 3, wherein the gear housing (Fig. 8, 35) is designed such that all the torques applied by an electric motor (“electric motor” 40) and by the gearing mechanism (45) are directed via the gear housing (35) directly into the brake calliper (4; see Fig. 8). Regarding Claim 9, Sakashita teaches an electromechanical brake (Fig. 8, 1c) having an electric motor (40) for operating the brake (see Fig. 8), which motor is torque-transmittingly coupled to the spindle (80), and having a brake actuator unit (see Fig. 8) according to claim 1. Regarding Claim 10, Sakashita teaches the brake actuator unit according to claim 2, wherein the brake actuator unit has a gear module (Fig. 8, 45, 35), which is drive-coupled to the spindle (80) and has a gear housing (35) that is fastened directly to the brake calliper (4). Regarding Claim 11, Sakashita teaches the brake actuator unit according to claim 4, wherein the gear housing (Fig. 8, 35) is designed as a single piece (see Fig. 8). Regarding Claim 12, Sakashita teaches the brake actuator unit according to claim 5, wherein the gear housing (Fig. 8, 35) has a centring hole (portion of 35 for receiving 11), which runs coaxially with a centring collar (collar portion of 11) of the brake calliper (4) and is connected thereto (see Fig. 8). Regarding Claim 13, Sakashita teaches the brake actuator unit according to claim 6, wherein the gear module (Fig. 8, 45, 35) has a ring gear (61), which is mounted by a press fit in a receptacle in the gear housing (35; see Fig. 8), wherein the ring gear (45) is part of a gearing mechanism (45) that is drive-connected to the spindle (80). Regarding Claim 14, Sakashita teaches the brake actuator unit according to claim 7, wherein the gear housing (Fig. 8, 35) is designed such that all the torques applied by an electric motor (40) and by the gearing mechanism (45) are directed via the gear housing (35) directly into the brake calliper (4; see Fig. 8). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to Applicant's disclosure. The prior art of Fugel (US 2026/0055800), Kim (US 8,851,242), Sala (US 10,550,903) and Song (US 10,274,033) listed in the attached "Notice of References Cited" disclose similar brake actuator units comprising spindle bearings related to various aspects of the claimed invention. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to James J. Taylor II whose telephone number is (571)272-4074. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 9:00 am - 5:00 pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ernesto Suarez can be reached at 571-270-5565. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JAMES J. TAYLOR II Primary Examiner Art Unit 3655 /JAMES J TAYLOR II/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3655
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 15, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12734382
HIGH VOLTAGE CABLE ROUTING FOR ELECTRIFIED VEHICLE
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12736118
ROTARY ELEMENT FOR TRANSMITTING ROTARY MOTION
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12716477
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR COUPLING A LOCK PLATE AND ACTUATOR
1y 6m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12710078
SELF-LOCKING MECHANISM, MOTOR, AND LINEAR ACTUATOR
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12698808
SAFETY CLUTCH FOR AN AGRICULTURAL VEHICLE
1y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+25.7%)
1y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 379 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month