Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/807,370

USER INTERFACES FOR MANAGING CONTROLLABLE EXTERNAL DEVICES

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 16, 2024
Priority
May 31, 2019 — provisional 62/855,895 +3 more
Examiner
SILVERMAN, SETH ADAM
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Apple Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
344 granted / 469 resolved
+13.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
504
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.8%
-32.2% vs TC avg
§103
61.1%
+21.1% vs TC avg
§102
17.4%
-22.6% vs TC avg
§112
10.1%
-29.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 469 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 9/27/2024, 11/11/2024, 11/19/2024, 3/3/2025, 3/18/2025, 3/26/2025, 4/4/2025, 4/17/2025, 5/20/2025, 6/5/2025, 7/1/2025, 7/22/2025, 8/6/2025, 8/25/2025, 9/18/2025, 10/3/2025, 10/16/2025, 10/27/2025, 11/6/2025, 12/3/2025, 12/11/2025, 1/2/2026, & 1/27/2026, was filed before the first office action. The submissions are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements are being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Merkulov et al. (US 20130013118 A1, published: 1/10/2013), in view of Noor (US 20190368763 A1, published: 12/5/2019). Claim 1: Merkulov teaches an electronic device, comprising: a display device (the system 100 may further include appropriate computer UI 128, such as a display [Merkulov, 0024]); one or more processors; and memory storing one or more programs configured to be executed by the one or more processors (the processor or central processing unit (CPU) 116 may be connected to memory 118 via an interconnect bus 126 [Merkulov, 0024]), the one or more programs including instructions for: displaying, on the display device, a temperature mode creation user interface including a first set of controls for creating a temperature mode for an external thermostat device controllable by the electronic device; while displaying, on the display device, the temperature mode creation user interface, detecting a first set of one or more inputs (FIG. 2 is a diagram depicting an exemplary thermostat UI. As shown, the thermostat UI is enabled in an arc or dial design. In this example, the set point input is 72 degrees and the set point range is 70 to 74 degrees. This example also depicts a temperature algorithm input, where the user has selected a setting close the maximum comfort axis. In one aspect, the thermostat UI 114 accepts user inputs modifying the set point range, and the energy management application modifies a temperature algorithm in response to the modified set point range [Merkulov, 0028, FIG. 2]); in response to detecting the first set of one or more inputs: selecting a temperature range that includes a minimum temperature and a maximum temperature, different than the minimum temperature; and associating the temperature range with a first temperature mode; and associating the first temperature mode with the first scheduled operation (one side of the temperature scale may be the heating control object. This object is adjustable by the user so that the user's desired optimum heating set point is displayed. Around this desired optimum heating set point is a displayed range, which may be at the same scale as the temperature indicator, and which shows the maximum and minimum temperatures that the system allows when heating. On the other side of the temperature scale is the cooling control object. This object is similarly adjusted by the user to configure the optimum cooling set point. Around this desired optimum cooling set point is a displayed range (e.g., at the same scale as the temperature indicator), which shows the maximum and minimum temperatures that the system will allow when cooling [Merkulov, 0009]; Examiner's Note: wherein cooling and heating points are considered different modes associated with different). Merkulov does not teach after associating the temperature range with the first temperature mode, displaying, on the display device, a temperature scheduling user interface including a second set of controls for creating a scheduled operation of the external thermostat device; while displaying, on the display device, the temperature scheduling user interface, detecting a second set of one or more inputs; and in response to detecting the second set of one or more inputs: selecting a first criteria for activation of a first scheduled operation. However, Noor teaches teach after associating the temperature range with the first temperature mode, displaying, on the display device, a temperature scheduling user interface including a second set of controls for creating a scheduled operation of the external thermostat device; while displaying, on the display device, the temperature scheduling user interface, detecting a second set of one or more inputs; and in response to detecting the second set of one or more inputs: selecting a first criteria for activation of a first scheduled operation (a user may interact with the HVAC system scheduling module 194 to select certain days and/or times of the day when various temperature setpoints should be used. For instance, the user may set the HVAC system 100 to a higher or lower setpoint at times when the user does not wish for the HVAC system 100 to provide conditioned air to a conditioned space. Scheduling may be done by specific date and/or times, days of the week, months, and other classifications of time [Noor, 0060]. A measured temperature or temperature setpoint may also be displayed on the user interface 250. The temperature icon 276 may be selected via user input, which may cause the VR/AR equipment 102 to display a screen with temperature setpoints, such as minimum and maximum temperature setpoints [Noor, 0086]; Examiner's Note: wherein setting a range implies a small number to a big number, both being different numbers). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art, before the invention was filed, to modify the displayed temperature control invention of Merkulov to include the temperature control feature of Noor. One would have been motivated to make this modification to make precise temperature adjustments and schedules to allow for varying temperature environments at different times. Claims 5 and 9, having similar deficiencies to claim 1, are likewise. Claim 2: The combination of Merkulov and Noor, teaches the electronic device of claim 1. Noor further teaches wherein the second set of one or more inputs includes an input corresponding to a selection of the first temperature mode from among a plurality of available temperature modes (A measured temperature or temperature setpoint may also be displayed on the user interface 250. The temperature icon 276 may be selected via user input, which may cause the VR/AR equipment 102 to display a screen with temperature setpoints, such as minimum and maximum temperature setpoints [Noor, 0086]). Claims 6 and 10, having similar deficiencies to claim 2, are likewise. Claim 3: The combination of Merkulov and Noor, teaches the electronic device of claim 1. Merkulov further teaches wherein selecting the temperature range includes: displaying, in the temperature mode creation user interface, a graphical indication of the selected temperature range, including: in accordance with a first portion of the selected temperature range being within a first predetermined temperature range, displaying a first portion of the graphical indication in a first color that corresponds to the first predetermined temperature range; and in accordance with the first portion of the selected temperature range being within a second predetermined temperature range, displaying the first portion of the graphical indication in a second color, different from the first color, that corresponds to the second predetermined temperature range (FIG. 2 is a diagram depicting an exemplary thermostat UI. As shown, the thermostat UI is enabled in an arc or dial design. In this example, the set point input is 72 degrees and the set point range is 70 to 74 degrees. This example also depicts a temperature algorithm input, where the user has selected a setting close the maximum comfort axis. In one aspect, the thermostat UI 114 accepts user inputs modifying the set point range, and the energy management application modifies a temperature algorithm in response to the modified set point range [Merkulov, 0028, FIG. 2]; Examiner's Note: as illustrated). Claims 7 and 11, having similar deficiencies to claim 3, are likewise. Claim 4: The combination of Merkulov and Noor, teaches the electronic device of claim 3, wherein selecting the temperature range includes: displaying a numeric indication of the minimum temperature, including: in accordance with the minimum temperature being with the first predetermined temperature range, displaying the numeric indication of the minimum temperature in the first color; and in accordance with the minimum temperature being with the second predetermined temperature range, displaying the numeric indication of the minimum temperature in the second color; and displaying a numeric indication of the maximum temperature, including: in accordance with the maximum temperature being with the first predetermined temperature range, displaying the numeric indication of the maximum temperature in the first color; and in accordance with the maximum temperature being with the second predetermined temperature range, displaying the numeric indication of the maximum temperature in the second color (whether the temperature reflected by the temperature icon 276 is within the minimum and maximum temperature setpoints may be indicated by a color of a ring 277 of the temperature icon 276. For example, when the displayed temperature is within a range of temperatures defined by the minimum and maximum temperatures, the ring 277 may be green. Yet, when the temperature in the temperature icon 276 is outside of the range of temperatures between the minimum and maximum temperature setpoints, the ring 277 may be a different color, such as red [Noor, 0086]). Claims 8 and 12, having similar deficiencies to claim 4, are likewise. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SETH A SILVERMAN whose telephone number is (571)272-9783. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Thur, 8AM-4PM MST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Adam Queler can be reached at (571)272-4140. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Seth A Silverman/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2172
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 16, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 03, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12705415
PAGE INTERACTION METHOD, DEVICE, APPARATUS AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 6m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12704940
COOKING RECIPE DISPLAY SYSTEM, COOKING RECIPE DISPLAY DEVICE, COOKING RECIPE DISPLAY METHOD, AND PROGRAM
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12699549
PROCESSING TEXT DATA USING A HARDWARE COMPUTING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12693773
Multi-Tiered Content Navigation Provided by a Graphical User Interface
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12681035
FLUID FLOW ESTIMATION AND NAVIGATION
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+13.6%)
2y 8m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 469 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month