Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/814,953

ACCUMULATED DATA TRANSFER AMOUNT ACCESS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Aug 26, 2024
Examiner
ST LEGER, GEOFFREY R
Art Unit
2192
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
The Toronto-dominion Bank
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
550 granted / 664 resolved
+27.8% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+20.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
680
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
16.4%
-23.6% vs TC avg
§103
51.3%
+11.3% vs TC avg
§102
14.8%
-25.2% vs TC avg
§112
11.8%
-28.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 664 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-20 have been submitted for examination and are pending further prosecution by the United States Patent & Trademark Office. Allowable Subject Matter With respect to independent claim 1, the prior art of record does not teach or suggest, either solely or in combination, the limitations "receive a transfer instruction from the client portal to direct a transfer amount from the accumulated-resource amount to a second logical storage location which is different from the first logical storage location; and initiate a pull transfer of the transfer amount to the second logical storage location prior to the future date bypassing the first logical storage location." when considered in combination with the other limitations of claim 1. With respect to independent claim 9, the prior art of record does not teach or suggest, either solely or in combination, the limitations "receive a transfer instruction to direct a transfer amount from the accumulated-resource amount to a second logical storage location which is different from the first logical storage location; and initiate a pull transfer of the transfer amount to the second logical storage location prior to the future date bypassing the first logical storage location." when considered in combination with the other limitations of claim 9. With respect to independent claim 14, the prior art of record does not teach or suggest, either solely or in combination, the limitations "displaying an interface for providing a transfer instruction from the client portal to direct a transfer amount of the accumulated-resource amount to a second logical storage location which is different than the first logical storage location; and initiate a pull transfer of the transfer amount to the second logical storage location prior to the future date bypassing the first logical storage location." when considered in combination with the other limitations of claim 14. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claim 8 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which applicant regards as the invention. Claim 8 recites the limitation "generate and provide to the client portal the accumulated-resource amount and the resource amount from the first logical storage location.". There is insufficient antecedent basis for the resource amount in the claim. In the interests of compact prosecution and for the purposes of examination, this limitation will be interpreted as "generate and provide to the client portal the accumulated-resource amount and the transfer Claim 20 recites the limitation "generating and providing to the client portal the accumulated-resource amount and the resource amount from the first logical storage location.". There is insufficient antecedent basis for the resource amount in the claim. In the interests of compact prosecution and for the purposes of examination, this limitation will be interpreted as "generating and providing to the client portal the accumulated-resource amount and the transfer Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. AU 2004323839 B2 discloses a method and system for operating a payment transaction system by a financial institution whereby, in one embodiment, the system receives a payment instruction directed from a buyer to a supplier, the payment instruction scheduled for a future date. The system allows the supplier to access scheduled payment instructions stored in a computer database of the system and bring forward the scheduled future date to a date prior to said future date by creating a new instruction for a second payment, allowing the supplier to receive funds to their account before the scheduled future date. KR 20170016262 A discloses a wristwatch-type mobile terminal in communication with a bank server and a payment server for performing financial transactions. In one embodiment, a mobile terminal user schedules a periodic automatic transfer of funds between the user's bank account and a remittee account to take place at future dates. By manipulating the wristwatch-type mobile terminal, the user can perform an advance transfer of funds so that the transfer is performed at a point earlier than the scheduled automatic transfer time. The NPL document "Fintech" is Wikipedia's entry on the subject. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GEOFFREY R ST LEGER whose telephone number is (571)270-7720. The examiner can normally be reached M-F (IFP) ~9:00-5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Hyung S Sough can be reached at 571-272-6799. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GEOFFREY R ST LEGER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2192
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 26, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12748579
IN-APPLICATION DYNAMIC USER INTERFACE RENDERING
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12737400
GENERATION OF EXECUTABLE PROCEDURE USING NATURAL LANGUAGE
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12724592
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR WORKFLOW APPLICATION PROGRAMMING INTERFACES (APIS)
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12710943
Method for Managing a Runtime System for a Hybrid Computing Architecture, Managed Runtime System, Apparatus and Computer Program
3y 11m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12711238
TECHNIQUES FOR APPLICATION ARCHITECTURE MANAGEMENT
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+20.8%)
2y 7m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 664 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month