Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 18/816,129

SMART SPRINKLER SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Aug 27, 2024
Examiner
ARTHUR JEANGLAUDE, GERTRUDE
Art Unit
3661
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Textron Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
93%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 93% — above average
93%
Career Allowance Rate
1436 granted / 1546 resolved
+40.9% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
1560
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.4%
-33.6% vs TC avg
§103
30.0%
-10.0% vs TC avg
§102
17.8%
-22.2% vs TC avg
§112
22.2%
-17.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1546 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In claim 1, the preamble states “a golf course condition reporting” while the body of the claim barely discloses any features relating to a golf course condition but only mention a water saturation level of an area of soil. Claims 2-17 are also rejected for incorporating the deficiencies of their base claim. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 18-20 are allowed. The prior art fails to disclose a golf course condition reporting system comprising: a non-transitory computer readable medium having instructions stored thereon that, upon execution by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to: acquire data regarding a water saturation level of at least one area of a golf hole; generate a graphical user interface based on the data, the graphical user interface including a saturation rating corresponding to the golf hole; and transmit the graphical user interface to a user device. Nor does the prior art disclose a golf course condition reporting system comprising: at least one sensor configured to acquire data regarding a water saturation level of an area of soil of a golf hole; at least one sprinkler configured to provide water to the area of soil; a user device configured to receive a user input regarding a current condition of the golf hole; and one or more processing circuits configured to: acquire the data; acquire the user input; transmit a command to the at least one sprinkler based on the data; and generate a graphical user interface for display on the user device based on the data and the user input. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Meadows et al. (U.S. Patent No. 7,118,498) disclose a personal golfing assistant system includes a handheld device and a GPS receiver that enables the user to survey and/or electronically capture geophysical golf data. The system can be used during the course of play to mark a ball location automatically, determine the distance to golf course targets or objects, analyze golf related data and generate statistics. The system provides a graphical display of useful golf-related information and can send a set of parameters tailored for a specific course to a real time tunable GPS to adjust for optimal performance and can adjust measurements to compensate for environmental condition changes. There is also provided a method for collecting and uploading golf course geographic information to an internet accessible server, processing the uploaded data, distributing data upon an authorized user request and downloading the requested data to an electronic device. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GERTRUDE ARTHUR JEANGLAUDE whose telephone number is (571)272-6954. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday, 7:30-8:00 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ramya P Burgess can be reached at 571-272-6011. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GERTRUDE ARTHUR JEANGLAUDE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3661
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 27, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12702261
ROBOT CLEANER AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING ROBOT CLEANER
3y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12704383
Systems and Methods for Using Visual Landmarks in Initial Navigation
2y 0m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12686425
WAYSIDE DEVICE MONITORING SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12680276
CONSTRUCTION MACHINE
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12681507
SOFTWARE AND ASSEMBLY FOR POINTING AND TILTING SOLAR PANELS
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
93%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+4.5%)
2y 1m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1546 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month