Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/819,993

Inline Shower Device

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Aug 29, 2024
Priority
Sep 01, 2023 — provisional 63/580,196
Examiner
SUTHERLAND, STEVEN M
Art Unit
3752
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Kohler Co.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
819 granted / 999 resolved
+12.0% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
1026
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.9%
-37.1% vs TC avg
§103
40.9%
+0.9% vs TC avg
§102
20.7%
-19.3% vs TC avg
§112
33.2%
-6.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 999 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I Species D in the reply filed on 6/10/2026 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 21-22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 21 recites the limitation “moving a diverter disposed within a housing of the inline dispensing device to a first position to fluidly couple;”. It is unclear which two components are being fluidly coupled by the first position of the diverter because the limitations are not recited, rendering the claim vague and indefinite. Claim 22 is rejected based upon its dependency upon claim 21. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 3, 6, 21 and 22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Boubsi WO 2020043498 A1. In regards to Independent Claim 1, Boubsi teaches an inline dispensing device (figure 3, where it is not claimed where the device terminates along a line or what type of fluid line the device is located within), comprising: a housing (1 as well as hoses and dispenser extending to 20 in figure 3); a pump (8) disposed within the housing (as shown in figure 3) and configured to dispense an ingredient (soap 9) into a flow passing through the housing (flow from 4); and a diverter assembly (16 in figure 4) disposed within the housing (16 is part of the housing, defined as the entirety of system in figure 3), the diverter assembly including a diverter (23.4) that is movable between a first position at which activation of the pump draws the ingredient into the housing (closed position blocking 23.8, where soap is drawn from soap container 10 into body of housing with pump 8), and a second position at which activation of the pump delivers the ingredient into the flow passing through the housing (position where 23.8 is open allowing flow of soap 9 from container 10 to mix with flow of water from opening 23.7 in chamber 23.6 before exiting 20). Regarding Dependent Claim 3, Boubsi teaches the pump is configured to operate in a suction mode when the diverter is in the first position (pump 8 will act as both a suction pump drawing fluid from tank 10, and a discharge pump discharging flow from the pump 8 through line 15.2 regardless of the position of diverter 23.4), and the pump is configured to operate in a discharge mode when the diverter is in the second position (pump 8 will act as both a suction pump drawing fluid from tank 10, and a discharge pump discharging flow from the pump 8 through line 15.2 regardless of the position of diverter 23.4). Regarding Dependent Claim 6, Boubsi teaches a battery pack (6) disposed within the housing (as shown in figure 3) and coupled to the pump (lines extending from 6 to 11, and 11 to pump 8 in figure 3), wherein the battery pack is removable from the housing (6 is capable of being removed from casing 1 surrounding 6 is casing 1 is taken apart, where the type or ease of removal of the battery pack is not claimed). In regards to Independent Claim 21, Boubsi teaches a method of introducing an ingredient (soap 9) into flow passing through a housing of an inline dispensing device (flow of water 4 passing through 16 of housing, where housing extends from casing 1 to the outlets 20 shown in figure 3), the method comprising: moving a diverter (23.4) disposed within a housing of the inline dispensing device (potion 16 of housing) to a first position to fluidly couple (closed position blocking 23.8, where soap is drawn from soap container 10 into body of housing with pump 8); activating a pump (pump 8) disposed within the housing to draw the ingredient into the housing when the diverter is in the first position (closed position blocking 23.8, where soap is drawn from soap container 10 into body of housing with pump 8); moving the diverter to a second position (23.4 slid with 17 in figure 4); and activating the pump to deliver the ingredient into the flow passing through the housing when the diverter is in the second position (position where 23.8 is open allowing flow of soap 9 from container 10 to mix with flow of water from opening 23.7 in chamber 23.6 before exiting 20). Regarding Dependent Claim 22, Boubsi teaches activating the pump to draw ingredient into the housing comprises operating the pump in a suction mode (pump 8 will act as both a suction pump drawing fluid from tank 10, and a discharge pump discharging flow from the pump 8 through line 15.2 regardless of the position of diverter 23.4), and activating the pump to deliver the ingredient into the flow passing through the housing comprises operating the pump in a discharge mode (pump 8 will act as both a suction pump drawing fluid from tank 10, and a discharge pump discharging flow from the pump 8 through line 15.2 regardless of the position of diverter 23.4). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Boubsi as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Borod 5,409,167. Regarding Dependent Claim 5, Boubsi teaches the invention as claimed and discussed above. However, Boubsi does not teach that the housing comprises two sections coupled to each other by a bulkhead. Borod teaches a dispensing device (10) with two housing sections (22 and 12) coupled through a bulkhead (base of 12 included threaded fastener 24 in figure 1). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the filing date of the invention to connect the water container of Boubsi outside of the casing of Boubsi connected with threading, as taught by Borod, in order to allow visual indication of the fluid levels of the water container (Col. 3, ll. 51-57). Claim(s) 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Boubsi as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Farley 2020/0270146. Regarding Dependent Claim 9, Boubsi teaches the invention as claimed and discussed above. However, Boubsi does not teach a filter assembly detachably coupled to the housing. Farley teaches detachably coupling a filter cartridge (21) within a housing (10) of a dispensing device (figure 1). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the filing date of the invention to couple the removable filter of Farley to the water line within the housing of Boubsi, in order to filter water passing through the device with an easily replaceable cartridge (paragraph [0012]). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2 ,4, 7-8 and 10-16 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: prior art fails to teach, in combination with the other limitations of dependent claim 2, the diverter is configured to move from the second position to the first position in response to engagement of a refill apparatus with the refill port; prior art fails to teach, in combination with the other limitations of dependent claim 4, a controller communicably coupled to the user interface and configured to control operation of the pump between a suction mode and a discharge mode based on inputs to the user interface; prior art fails to teach, in combination with the other limitations of dependent claim 7, the diverted disposed within the diverter housing being rotatably coupled to the diverter housing; prior art fails to teach, in combination with the other limitations of dependent claim 10, the control circuit configured to control operation of the pump between a discharge mode and a suction mode based on actuation of the single actuator; and prior art fails to teach, in combination with the other limitations of dependent claim 12, the diverter interface including a keyed interface that is engageable with the diverter assembly to actuate the diverter to change a flow direction of a liquid through the inline dispensing device. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEVEN M SUTHERLAND whose telephone number is (571)270-1902. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Arthur Hall can be reached at (571) 270 - 1814. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /STEVEN M SUTHERLAND/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3752
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 29, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12691309
EMBER ARMOR WILDFIRE PROTECTION SPRINKLER
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12680499
CYCLONIC SEPARATOR FOR GAS TURBINE ENGINE
1y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12663153
COMBUSTOR APPARATUS
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12654051
APPARATUSES AND METHODS FOR MEASURING FIRE SPREAD RATE
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12650092
ACCESSIBLE DEBRIS SEPARATOR FOR HIGH PRESSURE TURBINE OUTSIDE DIAMETER FED STATIC COMPONENTS
1y 4m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+15.4%)
2y 8m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 999 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month