Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/822,837

TECHNIQUES FOR TEMPERATURE STABILIZING AT LEAST ONE DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 03, 2024
Examiner
JONES, GORDON A
Art Unit
3763
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Honeywell International Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
61%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 61% of resolved cases
61%
Career Allowance Rate
353 granted / 581 resolved
-9.2% vs TC avg
Strong +39% interview lift
Without
With
+38.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
637
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
51.2%
+11.2% vs TC avg
§102
19.7%
-20.3% vs TC avg
§112
28.6%
-11.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 581 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I/Species A in the reply filed on 7/22/2026 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1-4, 6-7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Day US 2007/0291804 Al in view of CN ‘773 CN116466773A and Harker US 20040184494 A1 . Re claim 1, Day teach an apparatus which temperature stabilizes at least one device (“laser” para 18), the apparatus comprising: a package (4) comprising a package thermal conductor; a thermally activated switch including: a thermo electric cooler (TEC)(22) including a first TEC surface thermally connected to the package thermal conductor, and a second TEC surface; a thermally activated actuator (TAA) (24, 80 via 10, para 43, 50-51); and a thermal conductor (TC) (20) including a TC surface; the at least one device on and/or in the thermal conductor (fig 2a); and a temperature compensation system on and/or in the thermal conductor (para 43, 50-51), wherein the temperature compensation system includes at least one temperature sensor (10), , and a processing circuitry (para 50), and wherein the at least one temperature sensor each of which is in the package or thermally coupled to the package thermal conductor, and wherein the at least one temperature sensor is configured to measure a first temperature that is a function of (x) a temperature of an interior environment in the package and/or (y) a temperature of the package (para 50); wherein the thermally activated switch is configured to (a) thermally couple the thermal conductor and the thermal electric cooler TEC when the first temperature and/or a temperature of the thermally activated actuator exceeds a second temperature threshold level and (b) thermally decouple the thermal conductor and the thermal electric cooler TEC when the first temperature and/or the temperature of the thermally activated actuator is less than the second temperature threshold level (para 50); wherein the second temperature threshold level is greater than the first temperature threshold level. Day fail to teach a heater and controls. CN ‘773 teach a heater (5), wherein the processing circuitry is configured to cause the heater to heat the at least one device when the first temperature is below a first temperature threshold level and to not heat the at least one device when the first temperature is above the first temperature threshold level (fig 1 ), wherein the thermally activated switch is configured to (a) thermally couple the thermal conductor and the thermal electric cooler TEC when the first temperature and/or a temperature of the thermally activated actuator exceeds a second temperature threshold level and (b) thermally decouple the thermal conductor and the thermal electric cooler TEC when the first temperature and/or the temperature of the thermally activated actuator is less than the second temperature threshold level (para 50); wherein the second temperature threshold level is greater than the first temperature threshold level (fig 1) to add a PID TEC circuit. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to include a heater and controls as taught by CN ‘773 in the Day invention in order to advantageously allow for fine laser temperature controls. Additionally, Harker teach a heater , wherein the processing circuitry is configured to cause the heater to heat the at least one device when the first temperature is below a first temperature threshold level and to not heat the at least one device when the first temperature is above the first temperature threshold level , wherein the thermally activated switch is configured to (a) thermally couple the thermal conductor and the thermal electric cooler TEC when the first temperature and/or a temperature of the thermally activated actuator exceeds a second temperature threshold level and (b) thermally decouple the thermal conductor and the thermal electric cooler TEC when the first temperature and/or the temperature of the thermally activated actuator is less than the second temperature threshold level (para 50); wherein the second temperature threshold level is greater than the first temperature threshold level (para 3) to operate lasers in low ambient temperatures. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to include a heater and controls as taught by Harker in the Day, as modified, invention in order to advantageously allow for fine tuning laser temperature controls. Re claim 2, Day teach wherein the at least one device comprises at least one laser (see the rejection of claim 1). Re claim 3, Day teach wherein the apparatus is an atomic sensor (noting naming a sensor a term is broad and doesn’t change the structure); wherein the at least one device comprises at least one of: at least one laser, at least one integrated circuit, at least one source of electromagnetic energy, a mechanical structure, an atomic reservoir, and optics (see the rejection of claim 1). Re claim 4, Harker teach wherein the package further comprises a package thermal insulator (204) partially or wholly covering an interior surface of the package thermal conductor (fig 2) to operate lasers in low ambient temperatures. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to include a heater and controls as taught by Harker in the Day, as modified, invention in order to advantageously allow for fine tuning laser temperature controls. Re claim 6, Day, as modified, teach wherein the processing circuitry is further configured to activate the thermal electric cooler TEC when the thermally activated switch thermally couples the thermal conductor and the thermal electric cooler TEC; wherein the processing circuitry is further configured to deactivate the thermal electric cooler TEC when the thermally activated switch thermally decouples the thermal conductor and the thermal electric cooler TEC (noting the broad terminology is met by turning the circuity on and off). It is also unclear whether or not the limitations after the phrase “when” actually occur/are required since the term “when” is a conditional phrase. Re claim 7, Day teach wherein the thermally activated actuator comprises a first thermal conductor portion and a second thermal conductor portion which are thermally isolated from one another by a thermal insulator; wherein the first thermal conductor portion is thermally coupled to the package thermal conductor; wherein the second thermal conductor portion is configured to form a thermal connection between the TC surface and the second TEC surface (noting all parts a thermally connected to a degree, and 24 see fig 2a, 2b is a sub assembly, para 52, are well known to haver components mounted on and chip/substrate which is a semiconductor with insulative properties as compared to a pure metal heat spreader for example). Claim(s) 5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Day US 2007 /0291804 Al in view of CN ‘773 CN116466773A and Weisensee US 20220042754 A1 . Re claim 5, Day, as modified, fail to teach actuator details. Weisensee wherein the thermally activated actuator comprises at least one of a wax motor and a bimetallic strip; wherein the thermally activated switch performs thermal coupling and thermal decoupling based on the temperature of the thermally activated actuator (para 8) to use a particular actuator. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to include actuator details as taught by Weisensee in the Day, as modified, invention in order to advantageously allow for use of an actuator known in the art for temperature control which is passive. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 12727122 B1 teach a wax motor.. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GORDON A JONES whose telephone number is (571)270-1218. The examiner can normally be reached 7:30-5 M-F PST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Len Tran can be reached at 571-272-1184. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GORDON A JONES/Examiner, Art Unit 3763
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 03, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 23, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12768601
HEAT EXCHANGER AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING HEAT EXCHANGER
2y 1m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12772420
Hybrid Dry Adiabatic Cooling Chilled Water Plant for Data Centers and Other IT Environments
1y 2m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12728455
METHOD FOR PRODUCING HEAT CONDUCTIVE MEMBER AND HEAT EXCHANGER
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12722450
THERMAL MANAGEMENT MODULE FOR A THERMAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
3y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12707596
INTEGRATED PREHEATED PUMP-DRIVEN TWO-PHASE FLOW SYSTEM
1y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
61%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+38.6%)
3y 3m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 581 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month