Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/825,728

CLIENT DEVICE FOR FACILITATING EXPERIENCES BASED ON PROXIMITY-BASED INTERACTIONS WITH FURNISHING UNITS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 05, 2024
Priority
Dec 03, 2020 — provisional 63/120,906 +6 more
Examiner
BELOUSOV, ANDREY
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Wrmth Corp.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 8m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
416 granted / 601 resolved
+9.2% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+26.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
634
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
77.2%
+37.2% vs TC avg
§102
12.0%
-28.0% vs TC avg
§112
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 601 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION This action is responsive to the filing of 9/5/24. Claims 1-20 are pending and have been considered below. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-15, 17-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jacobs (2018/0271287) in view of Alsberg (2021/0095878.) Claim 1, 19: Jacobs discloses a client device (par. 253, a remote chair controller 3500 may include a display (e.g., a liquid crystal display, a LED display, a vacuum fluorescent display, an OLED display, etc.) and/or may be a smart device (e.g., a tablet computer, a cellular phone, etc.)) comprising: an identifier input unit configured to determine first furnishing unit identifier data conveyed by a first identifier conveyance unit of a first furnishing unit (Fig. 2: chairs) in proximity to the client device (par. 257, the display 3600 may communicate seat identity to the patron, theatre staff, etc. Alternately, or additionally, the display 3600 may communicate to the patron and aid the patron/staff in locating their/a seat and, thus, function as an “electronic usher.”), wherein the first furnishing unit includes a plurality of experience facilitation elements (par. 257, chair motion, hearing impaired functionality, chair heating/cooling, chair massage, etc.); at least one processor (par. 108, Any given telephone 127 may include a processor, a memory having at least on set of computer-readable instructions stored thereon and associated with managing powered reclining chairs and venue operations, a network adapter, a display and a keyboard); and at least one memory storing operational instructions (par. 108, Any given telephone 127 may include a processor, a memory having at least on set of computer-readable instructions stored thereon and associated with managing powered reclining chairs and venue operations, a network adapter, a display and a keyboard) that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the client device to: display experience option data for the first furnishing unit via an interactive user interface based on the first furnishing unit identifier data; generate first experience selection data based on user input to the interactive user interface corresponding to each of the plurality of experience facilitation elements of the first furnishing unit; store the first experience selection data corresponding to the first furnishing unit in the at least one memory (Par. 253, A remote chair controller 3500 may include a display (e.g., a liquid crystal display, a LED display, a vacuum fluorescent display, an OLED display, etc.) and/or may be a smart device (e.g., a tablet computer, a cellular phone, etc.) Par. 257, Such a device 3500 may enable associated chair functions, as paid for by the patron, when the device 3500 is adjacent/paired to the associated chair. Different service tiers (e.g., chair motion, hearing impaired functionality, chair heating/cooling, chair massage, etc.) transmit, responsive to the single user interaction with the interactive user interface, the first experience selection data to the first furnishing unit, wherein the plurality of experience facilitation elements of the first furnishing unit are each controlled based on the first experience selection data (Par. 253, A remote chair controller 3500 may include a display (e.g., a liquid crystal display, a LED display, a vacuum fluorescent display, an OLED display, etc.) and/or may be a smart device (e.g., a tablet computer, a cellular phone, etc.). Par. 257, Such a device 3500 may enable associated chair functions, as paid for by the patron, when the device 3500 is adjacent/paired to the associated chair. Different service tiers (e.g., chair motion, hearing impaired functionality, chair heating/cooling, chair massage, etc.) However, Jacobs does not explicitly disclose: display, via the interactive user interface, an option to transmit the first experience selection data to the first furnishing unit via a single user interaction with the interactive user interface. Alsberg discloses a similar device for setting climate control, including: display, via the interactive user interface, an option to transmit the first experience selection data to the first furnishing unit via a single user interaction with the interactive user interface (Fig. 3-4, ‘Use this setting?’ ‘Yes.’ Par. 31, the thermostat displays an “Apply to Current Zone” option and an “Apply to All Zones” options in lieu of a confirmation option (e.g., the “Yes” button 6 and 9 of FIG. 3 and FIG. 4), allowing the user to determine whether their selected program applies to only the current zone or to all zones without increasing the number of user inputs required. In other embodiments, the thermostat may further display a confirmation button for the user to confirm their selection.) Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Jacobs with Alsberg so as to allow a user to review their selections before confirming the changes. Claim 2, 20: Jacobs and Alsberg disclose the client device of claim 1, wherein the experience option data indicates a plurality of options that includes two or more of: at least one option for configuring heating intensity by at least one heating element of one of the first furnishing unit; at least one option for configuring heating location by at least one heating element of one of the first furnishing unit; at least one option for configuring cooling by at least one cooling element of one of the first furnishing unit; at least one option for configuring volume of at least one speaker of one of the first furnishing unit; at least one option for configuring music played by of at least one speaker of one of the first furnishing unit; at least one option for configuring entertainment content displayed by at least one display of one of the first furnishing unit; and at least one option for configuring lighting by at least one lighting element of one of the first furnishing unit (Jacobs Par. 257, Such a device 3500 may enable associated chair functions, as paid for by the patron, when the device 3500 is adjacent/paired to the associated chair. Different service tiers (e.g., chair motion, hearing impaired functionality, chair heating/cooling, chair massage, etc.) Claim 3: Jacobs and Alsberg disclose the client device of claim 2, wherein the experience selection data indicates selection of at least one of the plurality of options for each of the plurality of experience facilitation elements of the first furnishing unit (Alsberg Fig. 3: 5, Reduce the temperature; par. 31.) Claim 4: Jacobs and Alsberg disclose the client device of claim 1, wherein the first furnishing unit is a seating unit and one of the plurality of experience facilitation elements includes at least one heating element, wherein one of the plurality of experience facilitation elements includes at least one lighting element, and wherein the experience selection data includes commands to turn on the at least one heating element and to turn on the at least one lighting element (Jacobs par. 275, Any given user interface may include manual controls for the light sources, chair recline/upright controls, a chair heater control, a chair massage control, etc.) Claim 5: Jacobs and Alsberg disclose the client device of claim 1, wherein the first furnishing unit is a seating unit and one of the plurality of experience facilitation elements includes at least one heating element, wherein one of the plurality of experience facilitation elements includes at least one lighting element, and wherein the experience selection data includes commands to turn off the at least one heating element and to turn off the at least one lighting element (Jacobs par. 275, Any given user interface may include manual controls for the light sources, chair recline/upright controls, a chair heater control, a chair massage control, etc.) Claim 6: Jacobs and Alsberg disclose the client device of claim 1, wherein the interactive user interface is a touch screen interface and wherein the single user interaction with the interactive user interface corresponds to a single touch of the touch screen (Jacobs par. 200, associated device (e.g., a smart phone, a personal data assistant, a lap top computer, etc.) having a touch screen.) Claim 7: Jacobs and Alsberg disclose the client device of claim 1, wherein the client device is in proximity to the first furnishing unit during a first temporal period, wherein the identifier input unit determines first furnishing unit identifier data conveyed by the -first identifier conveyance unit of the first furnishing unit in proximity to the client device during the first temporal period (Jacobs par. 257, The patron may be given a device (e.g., device 3500 of FIG. 35) that may provide an indication, such as lights or vibrate when the device is adjacent to the patron's seat. The patron may be given a device 3500 that may provide an indication, such as a light or in the seat such as light up the display 3600 or partially open when the device 3500 is adjacent to the patron's seat.) Claim 8: Jacobs and Alsberg disclose the client device of claim 7, wherein the client device is in proximity to a second furnishing unit during a second temporal period after the first temporal period, wherein the identifier input unit determines second furnishing unit identifier data conveyed by a second identifier conveyance unit of the second furnishing unit in proximity to the client device during the second temporal period (Jacobs reusing the 3500 device with another patron at a later time. par. 257, Such a device 3500 may enable associated chair functions, as paid for by the patron, when the device 3500 is adjacent/paired to the associated chair. Different service tiers (e.g., chair motion, hearing impaired functionality, chair heating/cooling, chair massage, etc.) may be provided based on payment. Par. 257, The patron may be given a device (e.g., device 3500 of FIG. 35) that may provide an indication, such as lights or vibrate when the device is adjacent to the patron's seat. The patron may be given a device 3500 that may provide an indication, such as a light or in the seat such as light up the display 3600 or partially open when the device 3500 is adjacent to the patron's seat.) Claim 9: Jacobs and Alsberg disclose the client device of claim 8, wherein the operational instructions, when executed by the at least one processor, further cause the client device to: display experience option data for the second furnishing unit via the interactive user interface based on the second furnishing unit identifier data; generate second experience selection data based on user input to the interactive user interface corresponding to each of the plurality of experience facilitation elements of the second furnishing unit; store the second experience selection data corresponding to the second furnishing unit in the at least one memory; display, via the interactive user interface, an option to transmit the second experience selection data to the second furnishing unit via another single user interaction with the interactive user interface; and transmit, responsive to the another single user interaction with the interactive user interface, the experience selection data to the second furnishing unit, wherein the plurality of experience facilitation elements of the second furnishing unit are each controlled based on the second experience selection data (Jacobs reusing the 3500 device with another patron at a later time. Par. 257, Such a device 3500 may enable associated chair functions, as paid for by the patron, when the device 3500 is adjacent/paired to the associated chair. Different service tiers (e.g., chair motion, hearing impaired functionality, chair heating/cooling, chair massage, etc.) may be provided based on payment.) Claim 10: Jacobs and Alsberg disclose the client device of claim 8, wherein the operational instructions, when executed by the at least one processor, further cause the client device to: display experience option data for the second furnishing unit via the interactive user interface based on the second furnishing unit identifier data; generate second experience selection data based on user input to the interactive user interface corresponding to each of the plurality of experience facilitation elements of the second furnishing unit; store the second experience selection data corresponding to the second furnishing unit in the at least one memory; and transmit, responsive to the single user interaction with the interactive user interface, the second experience selection data to the second furnishing unit, wherein the plurality of experience facilitation elements of the second furnishing unit are each controlled based on the second experience selection data (Jacobs reusing the 3500 device with another patron at a later time. Par. 257, Such a device 3500 may enable associated chair functions, as paid for by the patron, when the device 3500 is adjacent/paired to the associated chair. Different service tiers (e.g., chair motion, hearing impaired functionality, chair heating/cooling, chair massage, etc.) may be provided based on payment.) Claim 11: Jacobs and Alsberg disclose the client device of claim 8, wherein the first furnishing unit and the second furnishing unit each have a peak electrical current draw that is less than 2.5 Amps (Jacobs par. 294, a specific example, a chair actuator may draw approximately 0.8 Amperes at 110V.sub.ac (approximately 88 Watts) when the chair actuator is energized.) Claim 12: Jacobs and Alsberg disclose the client device of claim 1, wherein the first furnishing unit is configured for outdoor use, wherein the furnishing unit are located at an outdoor location, wherein the client device generates the experience selection data while a corresponding user is at the outdoor location, and wherein at least one of the plurality of experience facilitation elements of the first furnishing unit counters at least one environmental condition at the outdoor location. (Jacobs Par. 257, Such a device 3500 may enable associated chair functions, as paid for by the patron, when the device 3500 is adjacent/paired to the associated chair. Different service tiers (e.g., chair motion, hearing impaired functionality, chair heating/cooling, chair massage, etc.) may be provided based on payment.) Claim 13: Jacobs and Alsberg disclose the client device of claim 12, wherein the at least one environmental condition includes darkness (Jacobs par. 275, Any given user interface may include manual controls for the light sources, chair recline/upright controls, a chair heater control, a chair massage control, etc.) Claim 14: Jacobs and Alsberg disclose the client device of claim 12, wherein the at least one environmental condition includes a cold ambient temperature (Jacobs Par. 257, Such a device 3500 may enable associated chair functions, as paid for by the patron, when the device 3500 is adjacent/paired to the associated chair. Different service tiers (e.g., chair motion, hearing impaired functionality, chair heating/cooling, chair massage, etc.) may be provided based on payment.) Claim 15: Jacobs and Alsberg disclose the client device of claim 12, wherein the at least one environmental condition includes a hot ambient temperature (Jacobs Par. 257, Such a device 3500 may enable associated chair functions, as paid for by the patron, when the device 3500 is adjacent/paired to the associated chair. Different service tiers (e.g., chair motion, hearing impaired functionality, chair heating/cooling, chair massage, etc.) may be provided based on payment.) Claim 17: Jacobs and Alsberg disclose the client device of claim 1, wherein the first identifier conveyance unit includes a Near-Field Communications (NFC) tag, and wherein the client device determines the first furnishing unit identifier data based on implementing an NFC reader (Jacobs par. 9, a near field communications input / output.) Claim 18: Jacobs and Alsberg disclose the client device of claim 1, wherein the first furnishing unit includes at least one proximity-based communications transceiver, and wherein the first experience selection data is received via the proximity-based communications transceiver from the client device via proximity-based communications with the client device (Jacobs par. 9, a near field communications input / output.) Claim(s) 16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jacobs (2018/0271287) in view of Alsberg (2021/0095878) and in further view of Desch (2015/0157791.) Claim 16: Jacobs and Alsberg disclose the client device of claim 1. However, Jacobs does not explicitly disclose: wherein the first identifier conveyance units is implemented via visual identifier data visibly displayed upon at least one surface of the first furnishing unit, wherein the client device determines the first furnishing unit identifier data based on a camera of the client device capturing the visual identifier data, and wherein the first furnishing unit identifier data is in accordance with a data format corresponding to a quick response (QR) code. Desch discloses a similar device for using a camera on a QR code, including: wherein the first identifier conveyance units is implemented via visual identifier data visibly displayed upon at least one surface of the first furnishing unit, wherein the client device determines the first furnishing unit identifier data based on a camera of the client device capturing the visual identifier data, and wherein the first furnishing unit identifier data is in accordance with a data format corresponding to a quick response (QR) code (Par. 516, The processors 3500 and/or 3600 may use the images from the camera 8127 to: read QR codes on the syringe to identify the syringe.) Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Jacobs with Desch so as to conveniently confirm an identity of a physical product and obtain further information about it. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Perkins (2021/0244221) Fig. 21A, adjusting temp with a client device. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANDREY BELOUSOV whose telephone number is (571) 270-1695 and Andrew.belousov@uspto.gov email. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Friday EST. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Adam Queler, can be reached at telephone number 571-272-4140. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from Patent Center and the Private Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from Patent Center or Private PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Patent Center and Private PAIR for authorized users only. Should you have questions about access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) Form at https://www.uspto.gov/patents/uspto-automated- interview-request-air-form. /Andrey Belousov/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 2172 6/10/26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 05, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12676945
COLLABORATIVE VIRTUAL SPACES
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12665971
IMAGE FORMATION APPARATUS, CONTROL METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12656874
VISUAL FEEDBACK FROM A USER EQUIPMENT
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12632170
METHODS FOR INTERACTING WITH USER INTERFACES BASED ON ATTENTION
2y 8m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12613715
DYNAMIC MANAGEMENT OF DISPLAY CONTENT
2y 7m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+26.6%)
3y 6m (~1y 8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 601 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month