Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Wrmth Corp. currently manages 2 pending office actions in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These actions are assigned to 2 distinct examiners and 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a high degree of technical focus, as all pending matters are within a single art unit.
BELOUSOV, ANDREY is the busiest examiner, overseeing 1 pending office action. Since there are 2 distinct examiners for the active matters, the workload is split evenly. Each examiner's individual tendencies will impact exactly half of the current pending portfolio.
The concentration of 2 pending office actions within 1 distinct art unit is a significant factor for prosecution strategy. It means that while the company interacts with 2 distinct examiners, they are both operating under the same art unit's guidelines and supervision. This Chemistry & Materials portfolio is currently navigating a very specific and centralized examination environment, with 1 examiner assigned per case.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BELOUSOV, ANDREY | 1 | 69.2% | +26.8% |
| EWALD, MARIA VERONICA | 1 | 58.4% | +6.0% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18825728 | CLIENT DEVICE FOR FACILITATING EXPERIENCES BASED ON PROXIMITY-BASED INTERACTIONS WITH FURNISHING UNITS | BELOUSOV, ANDREY | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1783 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18825728 | CLIENT DEVICE FOR FACILITATING EXPERIENCES BASED ON PROXIMITY-BASED INTERACTIONS WITH FURNISHING UNITS | BELOUSOV, ANDREY | — | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 05, 2024 |
| 18479257 | ARTICLES OF MANUFACTURE AND CONCRETE FORMULATIONS FOR USE THEREWITH | EWALD, MARIA VERONICA | 1783 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 41d | Pending | Oct 02, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial