Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/827,141

SHAPE MEASURING DEVICE AND SHAPE MEASURING METHOD

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 06, 2024
Priority
Mar 08, 2022 — JP 2022-035644 +1 more
Examiner
CHILTON, CLARA GRACE
Art Unit
3645
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Tokyo Seimitsu Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
52%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 0m
Est. Remaining
64%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 52% of resolved cases
52%
Career Allowance Rate
42 granted / 80 resolved
+0.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 1m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
119
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
58.6%
+18.6% vs TC avg
§102
23.5%
-16.5% vs TC avg
§112
15.9%
-24.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 80 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Oshima (US 20220043150 A1) in view of Bayer (US 20230131584 A1). Claim 1: Oshima teaches a shape measuring device comprising: […] a light source […] (Fig. 1, laser oscillator 1) a light dividing configured to split the light emitted from the wavelength swept light source into measurement light and reference light (Fig. 1, optical splitter 3a, [0050]); a probe configured to emit the measurement light split by the light dividing unit toward a surface to be measured and receive the measurement light reflected on the surface to be measured (Fig. 1, measuring head 5); a reference surface configured to reflect the reference light split by the light dividing unit; a multiplexing unit configured to generate multiplexed light of the measurement light reflected on the surface to be measured and received by the probe, and the reference light reflected on the reference surface (Fig. 1, coupler 6 and detection unit 7); a relative movement unit configured to relatively move the probe along the surface to be measured in a state of being spaced an interval apart from the surface to be measured, and scan the surface to be measured with the measurement light ([0053] - moving target surface); a detecting unit configured to, while relative movement of the prove is performed, repeatedly detect the multiplexed light generated by the multiplexing unit, for each measurement point on the surface to be measured on which the measurement light is incident (Fig. 1, detection unit 7 and [0057]); a distance calculating unit configured to detect a beat frequency from a detection signal of the multiplexed light detected by the detecting unit and calculate a distance from the probe to the measurement point based on the beat frequency, for each measurement point ([0057] - beat signal); a position calculating unit configured to calculate a position of the measurement point based on a calculation result of the distance calculating unit corresponding to the measurement point, for each measurement point ([0058] - measuring distance); a position correcting unit configured to correct the position of the measurement point calculated by the position calculating unit based on a Doppler shift amount of the measurement light reflected at the measurement point, for each measurement point ([0094]); and a scanning direction vector calculating unit configured to calculate, for each measurement point, a magnitude of a scanning direction vector of the measurement light for scanning the surface to be measured ([0146], finding angle), the scanning direction vector being parallel to a tangential direction of the surface to be measured at the measurement point ([0053]), wherein in a case where a direction of the measurement light between the probe and the measurement point is represented as a measurement light direction, the position correcting unit calculates, for each measurement point, the Doppler shift amount based on a component parallel to the measurement light direction of the scanning direction vector calculated by the scanning direction vector calculating unit and a wavelength or a frequency of the measurement light ([0069]-[0070], expression 1). Oshima does not teach, but Bayer does teach, where the light source is a wavelength swept light source ([0106] – note as frequency and wavelength are related, frequency swept means wavelength swept) configured to emit light whose frequency is modulated to have a sinusoidal waveform (abstract – frequency domain sinusoidal wave). It would have been prima facie obvious to someone having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use the wave, as taught by Bayer, in the device as taught by Oshima, because, as Bayer teaches, this makes the system more robust and sensitive ([0010]). Claim 2: Oshima, as modified, teaches the shape measuring device according to claim 1, wherein, based on shape data of the surface to be measured created in advance, the relative movement unit relatively moves the probe along the surface to be measured in a state of being spaced a fixed interval apart from the surface to be measured which is assumed from the shape data. ([0015] - constant velocity means equal intervals) Claim 3: Oshima, as modified, teaches the shape measuring device according to claim 1, wherein the probe makes the measurement light incident on the surface to be measured from an oblique direction ([0146] - angle). Claim 4: Claim 4 is a method claim corresponding to Claim 1. Thus, see rejection above. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CLARA CHILTON whose telephone number is (703)756-1080. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 6-2 MT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Helal Algahaim can be reached at 571-270-5227. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CLARA G CHILTON/Examiner, Art Unit 3645 /HELAL A ALGAHAIM/SPE , Art Unit 3645
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 06, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12761354
MINIATURIZED WIDE-RANGE LASER RANGE FINDER
3y 5m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12730221
COMBINED HIGH-ENERGY LASER (HEL) SYSTEM OR OTHER SYSTEM AND LASER DETECTION AND RANGING (LADAR) SYSTEM
5y 5m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12723866
OPTICAL DISTANCE SENSOR WITH CLOSED-LOOP EXPOSURE CONTROL AND CORRESPONDING METHOD
3y 8m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12710540
AUTONOMOUS SCANNING AND MAPPING SYSTEM
5y 9m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12710440
FABRY-PEROT BASED SPEED SENSOR
5y 0m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
52%
Grant Probability
64%
With Interview (+11.7%)
4y 1m (~2y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 80 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month