Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/828,176

REAR WHEEL STEERING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Sep 09, 2024
Priority
Sep 29, 2023 — JP 2023-169578
Examiner
LAGUARDA, GONZALO
Art Unit
3747
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Aisin Corporation
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
518 granted / 711 resolved
+2.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
768
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.2%
-35.8% vs TC avg
§103
39.6%
-0.4% vs TC avg
§102
25.1%
-14.9% vs TC avg
§112
20.3%
-19.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 711 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2, 4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Takahashi (U.S. Pat. No. 4,979,115). Regarding claim 1, Takahashi discloses a rear wheel steering apparatus comprising: a rear wheel steering mechanism configured to set a control speed of a rear wheel steering actuator in accordance with a vehicle speed of a vehicle (shown in fig. 5); an acquisition unit (103) configured to acquire traveling operation input information of the vehicle; a correction unit (103c) configured to correct the control speed based on the traveling operation input information; and a drive control unit configured to drive the rear wheel steering actuator based on a correction result of correction by the correction unit obtained by switching between a case where the control speed is limited and a case where the control speed is not limited (fig. 5 shows multiple limiting speeds the V=10 can be considered the non-limiting speed). Regarding claim 2 which depends from claim 1, Takahashi discloses wherein the acquisition unit is configured to acquire: steering speed information of front wheel steering of the vehicle (102) or acceleration (speed option addressed) or deceleration information of the vehicle as the traveling operation input information (speed option addressed). Regarding claim 4 which depends from claim 1, Takahashi discloses wherein the acquisition unit is configured to acquire, as the traveling operation input information, reverse operation information indicating that a reverse operation of front wheel steering of the vehicle is performed at a predetermined speed or higher (col. 5, lines 40-50 discloses operating the rear wheels in a reverse phase for certain speeds), and the correction unit is configured to, when the reverse operation information is acquired, maximize a limit on the control speed until a target steering angle of a rear wheel obtained by rear wheel steering coincides with an actual steering angle of the rear wheel (col. 6, lines 5-11). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Takahashi (U.S. Pat. No. 4,979,115) as applied to claim 1 above, and in view of Sonoda (U.S. Pat. No. 12,077,230). Regarding claim 3 which depends from claim 1, Takahashi discloses wherein the acquisition unit is configured to acquire steering direction information of front wheel steering of the vehicle as the traveling operation input information (col. 7, lines 15-20 discloses angle can be used instead of force), and Takahashi does not disclose the correction unit is configured to not limit the control speed when the steering direction information indicates steering to a neutral steering direction, and to limit the control speed when the steering direction information indicates steering to a non-neutral steering direction. Sonoda, which deals in steering, teaches the correction unit is configured to not limit the control speed when the steering direction information indicates steering to a neutral steering direction, and to limit the control speed when the steering direction information indicates steering to a non-neutral steering direction (col. 4, lines 16-36 discloses that when a certain type of steering is done the rear wheels are allowed to return to neutral quicker than the front wheels). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to have modified Takahashi with quick return to neutral of the Sonoda because it reduces yaw rate (col. 5, line 65- col. 6, line 3). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments submitted on 03/17/26 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The rejection of claims 1-4 has been withdrawn. A new rejection has been made. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Please review when considering a response to this office action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GONZALO LAGUARDA whose telephone number is (571)272-5920. The examiner can normally be reached 8-5 M-Th Alt. F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Logan Kraft can be reached at (571) 270-5065. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. GONZALO LAGUARDA Primary Examiner Art Unit 3747 email: gonzalo.laguarda@uspto.gov /GONZALO LAGUARDA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3747
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 09, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection (signed) — §102, §103
Dec 19, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Mar 03, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 03, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 17, 2026
Response Filed
May 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12692813
WAISSI ENGINE DRIVETRAIN BEARING RING INTERFACE TO PISTON BASE BEARING PAD
1y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12686467
POWER-ASSISTED DRIVE ASSEMBLY
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12661995
BRAKING CONTROL METHOD AND SYSTEM, VEHICLE, STORAGE MEDIUM AND CHIP
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12643532
WHEEL SLIP-BASED CONTROL FOR ACCELERATING AND DECELERATING HEAVY-DUTY VEHICLES
2y 0m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12630220
MODULAR KINEMATIC STEERING DEVICE
3y 0m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+6.7%)
2y 9m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 711 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month