Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/828,364

BATTERY MEASUREMENT JIG AND TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT JIG

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 09, 2024
Priority
Sep 22, 2023 — JP 2023-158927
Examiner
VELEZ, ROBERTO
Art Unit
2858
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Ivis Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allowance Rate
181 granted / 268 resolved
-0.5% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
294
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.6%
-37.4% vs TC avg
§103
52.4%
+12.4% vs TC avg
§102
28.5%
-11.5% vs TC avg
§112
13.6%
-26.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 268 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 09/09/2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of group I (claims 1-7) in the reply filed on 06/09/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 8-10 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 06/09/2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 3-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kim et al. (US PGPUB 2022/0337072). Regarding claim 1, Kim et al. teaches a battery measurement jig, comprising: a plurality of battery terminal connection portions (130 and 140) , each of the battery terminal connection portions including a battery terminal connection portion base (131 and 141) including a probe (132 and 142) configured to be connected to a battery terminal (21 and 22) being a part of a battery (20), and a battery terminal guide (1321 and 1421); and a flat bar (1221), wherein, the battery terminal connection portions (130 and 140) are arranged on the flat bar (1221), the battery terminal guide (1321 and 1421) is combined with the battery terminal connection portion base (131 and 141) so as to be configured to slide in a battery terminal direction of the battery (20) (as disclosed in para. 0126 and 0128), and the battery terminal connection portion base (131 and 141) is provided on the flat bar (1221) with a clearance so as to be configured to move in a direction perpendicular to the battery terminal (21 and 22) direction of the battery (20) (as shown in fig. 1 and 12). Regarding claim 3, Kim et al. teaches the limitations of claim 1, in addition, Kim et al. teaches wherein each of the battery terminal connection portions (130 and 140) installed on the flat bar (1221) is connected to the battery terminal (21 and 22) of the battery (20) by a fastening clamp (133 and 143) at a constant pressure (as disclosed in para. 0126 and 0128). Regarding claim 4, Kim et al. teaches the limitations of claim 1, in addition, Kim et al. teaches wherein each of the battery terminal connection portions (130 and 140) installed on the flat bar (1221) is connected to the battery terminal (21 and 22) of the battery (20) by a second fastening member (133 and 143). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2 and 5-7 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 2, the prior art fails to specifically teach a battery measurement jig, comprising: wherein: the battery terminal guide includes a first elastic body that supports the battery terminal guide with respect to the battery terminal connection portion base, and a tapered-shape hole that guides the battery terminal; a second elastic body is provided in the probe; the probe is configured to slide in the battery terminal direction of the battery; the battery terminal connection portion base is installed on the flat bar by a first fastening member such that a gap is provided between the flat bar and the battery terminal connection portion base; and a diameter of an attachment hole provided on the flat bar or the battery terminal connection portion base is greater than a diameter of the first fastening member such that the first fastening member is configured to move in a two-dimensional manner in a direction perpendicular to the battery terminal direction, in combination with all the limitations of the claim. Regarding claim 5, the prior art fails to specifically teach a battery measurement jig, comprising: wherein, regarding attachment between the flat bar and the battery terminal connection portion base, an attachment hole on the flat bar or an attachment hole on the battery terminal connection portion base has an elliptical shape having a long axis in a direction perpendicular to a stacking direction of batteries and the battery terminal direction of the battery, in combination with all the limitations of the claim. Regarding claim 6, the prior art fails to specifically teach a battery measurement jig, comprising: wherein a battery terminal side distal end of the probe is positioned closer to the battery terminal connection portion base than a terminal side end portion of the battery terminal guide is in a state before each of the battery terminal connection portions is connected to the battery terminal, and the probe is connected to the battery terminal after the battery terminal is inserted into a tapered-shape hole and the battery terminal guide comes into contact with the battery terminal, in combination with all the limitations of the claim. Regarding claim 7, the prior art fails to specifically teach a battery measurement jig, comprising: wherein: a connection determination bar is provided on the battery terminal connection portion base via a third elastic body; the battery terminal guide includes a gauge; the connection determination bar is configured to be inclined to the battery terminal guide in accordance with a pushing amount of the probe; and whether the probe is appropriately connected to the battery terminal is determined based on a position of the connection determination bar with respect to the gauge when viewed from a stacking direction of batteries, in combination with all the limitations of the claim. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROBERTO VELEZ whose telephone number is (571)272-8597. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 5:30am-3:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Huy Phan can be reached at (571)272-7924. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ROBERTO VELEZ/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2858
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 09, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12699137
DEFECT ANALYSIS OF ELECTRIC MOTORS USING REFERENCE FRAMES (DQZ COMPONENTS)
2y 3m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12687575
CONTROLLED SWITCHING OF STRESS VOLTAGES IN LATERAL DMOS STRUCTURES
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12681053
INTEGRATED CIRCUIT PIN FOR REFERENCE VOLTAGE AND FAULT COMMUNICATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12681047
COMPOSITE PROBE, METHOD FOR ATTACHING PROBE, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING PROBE CARD
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12644918
TESTING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR TESTING A HIGH OR MEDIUM-VOLTAGE CABLE
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+20.5%)
2y 9m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 268 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month