Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/832,176

MEASUREMENT DEVICE AND MEASUREMENT METHOD

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 23, 2024
Priority
Feb 07, 2022 — EU 22155410.8 +1 more
Examiner
TON, TRI T
Art Unit
2877
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Rise Research Institutes Of Sweden AB
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
1019 granted / 1180 resolved
+18.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
1222
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.7%
-36.3% vs TC avg
§103
70.3%
+30.3% vs TC avg
§102
7.1%
-32.9% vs TC avg
§112
13.3%
-26.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1180 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Priority 1. Receipt is acknowledged of papers submitted under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d), which papers have been placed of record in the file. Information Disclosure Statement 2. The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 07/23/24, 09/23/25, has been entered. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Specification 3. The specification filed on 07/23/24 are objected because main elements in the specification are not described correctly. For example: Specification page 18, lines 11 discloses “a batter 80” discloses. This should be “a battery 80”. Appropriate correction is required. Drawings 4. The drawings filed on 07/23/24. These drawings are acceptable. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 5. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 6. Claim(s) 1-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tam et al. (Pub. No. 2007/0263272) in view of Arsenault (U.S. Pub. No. 2018/0340831), further in view of Lorna Anne Everall (CN 1726664). Hereafter “Tam”, “Arsenault”, “Lorna”. (Please see attached files for Lorna’s reference). Regarding Claim(s) 1, Tam teaches a measurement device for measuring a local parameter using an optical fiber element incorporating an array of fiber Bragg gratings, FBGs, the measurement device (figure 2) comprising: a semiconductor optical amplifier, SOA, (figures 2, 5, SOA 10a, 10d, 10e), comprising an optical input for receiving light pulses to be amplified and an optical output for emitting light pulses, (the following figure 2, Pulse generator 20, SOA 10a, Input I, Output O); a pulse generator for providing the control input of the SOA with electrical current pulses to drive the SOA to emit light pulses (figures 2, 5, Pulse generator 20, SOA 10a, SOA 10d, SOA 10e); and light transmitting means (figures 2, 5, elements 12, 14, is not different from light transmitting means) for repeatedly; transmitting said light pulses from the optical output of the SOA to a FBG array of FBGs, (the following figure 2, light pulses from output O of the SOA 10a, FBG array GNM), and transmitting a fraction of reflected light pulses from each FBG of the FBG array to the optical input of the SOA to form a respective optical cavity with a characteristic lasing wavelength for each FBG of the FBG array (Figure 2, the circulator 14 transmits a fraction of reflected light pulses from each FBG GNM to the optical input I of the SOA 10a. Ring cavity 16 is not different from an optical cavity); wherein the measurement device is configured to be able to cause lasing at a respective lasing wavelength of said FBG of the FBG array (abstract, [0012]. It is inherent that the measurement device of figure 2 causes lasing at a respective lasing wavelength of said FBG of the FBG GNM array), and wherein the measurement device further comprising comprises: a filter element configured with a wavelength dependent transmission coefficient so that the filter element is able to filter the intensity of light transmitted from the respective optical cavity to output filtered light at a light intensity which is unique over a respective predetermined lasing wavelength range for said one of the FBGs of the FBG array ([0041], lines 18-25; Figure 5, ring cavity 16 is not different from an optical cavity, the combination of two SOA 10d, and SOA 10e for operating at different wavelength regions is not different from a filter element); processing means for converting the electrical signal to the local parameter being measured for said one of the FBGs of the FBG array, and for providing the local parameter being measured, (the following figure 2, the measurement system MS is not different from processing means. The limitations “for converting the electrical signal to the local parameter being measured … and for providing the local parameter being measured” is intended used). However, Tam does not teach an output light sensing element configured to detect said light intensity of said filtered light from the filter element and emit a corresponding electrical signal. Arsenault teaches an output light sensing element configured to detect said light intensity of said filtered light from the filter element and emit a corresponding electrical signal (figures 3, 5, photodetectors 42R, 42T are not different from light sensing elements, optical filter 40, processor 80; [0014], lines 1-4; [0019, 0021]; [0028]; [0029], lines 1-9. It is inherent that controller 14 with processor 80 generates an electrical signal). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention was made to modify Tam by having light sensing element in order to detect light beam from optical filter for the inspection system. Arsenault also teaches a filter element configured with a wavelength dependent transmission coefficient so that the filter element is able to filter the intensity of light transmitted from the respective optical cavity to output filtered light at a light intensity which is unique over a respective predetermined lasing wavelength range (figure 3, filter 40; [0019, 0021]); processing means for converting the electrical signal to the local parameter being measured for said one of the FBGs of the FBG array, and for providing the local parameter being measured ([0002, 0017]; [0014], lines 1-4; [0019, 0021]; [0028]; [0029], lines 1-9; figure 5, controller and processor 80). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention was made to modify Tam by having filter element and processing means in order to determine physical parameter measured by the Bragg gratings, (Arsenault, [0003]). Moreover, Tam does not teach a control input for receiving electrical current pulses to control the repetition rate of said SOA. Lorna teaches a control input for receiving electrical current pulses to control the repetition rate of said SOA, (page 8, lines 42-44; page 10, lines 37-41; page 11, lines 28-32; Figures 1(a), 4, 5-6, control input 22, SOA 14, SOA 52). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention was made to modify Tam by having a control input for receiving electrical current pulses in order to control the optical pulse generation and to the optical fiber, (Lorna, page 8, lines 42-44; page 10, lines 37-41; page 11, lines 28-32; Figures 1(a), 4, 5-6, control input 22, SOA 14, 52). Regarding Claim(s) 2, 18, Tam, Arsenault, Lorna teach all the limitations of claim 1 as stated above except for to determine roundtrip times of light pulses emitted from the SOA and corresponding reflected light pulses received by the SOA based on the resonant frequencies of the pulse generator for the respective lasing wavelength, the information of roundtrip times is determined based on the resonant frequencies of the pulse generator for the lasing wavelength. Lorna teaches to determine roundtrip times of light pulses emitted from the SOA and corresponding reflected light pulses received by the SOA based on the resonant frequencies of the pulse generator for the respective lasing wavelength (page 7, lines 43-49; Page 8, lines 1-2). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention was made to modify Tam and Arsenault by determining roundtrip times of light pulses in order to interrogate one or more reflective optical elements for inspection (Lorna, Abstract). Regarding Claim(s) 3, Tam, Arsenault, Lorna teach all the limitations of claim 1 as stated above except for a second light sensing element. Arsenault teaches a second light sensing element, (figure 3, element 42R). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention was made to modify Tam by having a second light sensing element in order to determine amplitudes of transmitted and reflected portions efficiently (Arsenault, [0027]). [AltContent: textbox (MS)][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (Output O)][AltContent: textbox (Input I)][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow] PNG media_image1.png 640 378 media_image1.png Greyscale Figure 2 Regarding Claim(s) 4, Tam, Arsenault, Lorna teach all the limitations of claim 1 as stated above except for the filter element is a fiber-based Fabry- Perot etalon or an apodized FBG [and/]or the optical cavity is a sigma-shaped optical cavity. Arsenault teaches Fabry- Perot etalon, ([0002, 0026, 0044]). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention was made to modify Tam by having a fiber-based Fabry- Perot etalon in order to generate a narrow-band light signal and transmit it to optical fiber network (Arsenault, [0026]). Regarding Claim(s) 5, Tam, Arsenault, Lorna teach all the limitations of claim 1 as stated above except for filter element being configured so that, for any one of, or for each of, the respective predetermined lasing wavelength ranges, the relationship between the light intensity of filtered light and lasing wavelength is such that the light intensity is increasing for increasing lasing wavelengths or such that the light intensity is decreasing for increasing lasing wavelengths. Arsenault teaches filter element being configured so that, for any one of, or for each of, the respective predetermined lasing wavelength ranges, the relationship between the light intensity of filtered light and lasing wavelength is such that the light intensity is increasing for increasing lasing wavelengths or such that the light intensity is decreasing for increasing lasing wavelengths, (figures 3, 5, optical filter 40; [0019, 0027]). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention was made to modify Tam by having filter element being configured so that, for any one of, or for each of, the respective predetermined lasing wavelength ranges in order to received different narrow-band light beams into transmitted and reflected portions, (Arsenault, [0026]). Regarding Claim(s) 6, Tam teaches a variable optical attenuator for attenuating the lasing wavelength ([0035, 0049]). Regarding Claim(s) 7, Tam teaches at least a second optical amplifier arranged in an optical loop with the first SOA, and wherein the second optical amplifier is preferably an Erbium doped fiber amplifier, EDFA, or a second SOA (figure 5, [0016, 0032, 0041, 0043]). Regarding Claim(s) 8, Tam teaches the light transmitting means are further repeatedly transmitting a fraction of reflected light pulses from each FBG of the FBG array to the optical input of the second optical amplifier and for repeatedly transmitting light pulses from the optical output of the second amplifier to the optical input of the first SOA, (the following figure 5, first and second SOA 10d, 10e, light transmitting means AA, FBG array GNM). [AltContent: textbox (AA)][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow] PNG media_image2.png 602 380 media_image2.png Greyscale Figure 5 Regarding Claim(s) 9, Tam teaches optical amplifier is configured for increasing the optical gain at the lasing wavelength ([0017]). Regarding Claim(s) 10, 11, Tam teaches the light transmitting means comprises optical fiber and one or more of a fiber coupler [and/]or one or more of a fiber circulator, (the above figures 2, 5, fiber AA, circulator 14, coupler 12). Regarding Claim(s) 12, Tam teaches selection means for calibrating the measurement device to measure a selected local parameter (figures 1-5, circulator 14 is not different from a selection means for calibrating the measurement device to measure a selected local parameter). Regarding Claim(s) 13, Tam teaches sample-and-hold circuitry down-stream of said light sensing element (figures 1-5, wavelength measurement system is not different from sample-and-hold circuitry down-stream). Regarding Claim(s) 14, 15, Tam, Arsenault, Lorna teach all the limitations of claim 1 as stated above except for displaying means for displaying a measured local parameter, and a battery. Arsenault teaches displaying means, ([0036]), a battery ([0030]). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention was made to modify Tam by having displaying means, and a battery in order to output information in a form understandable to users or machines, and to provide power to components (Arsenault, [0030, 0036]). Regarding Claim(s) 16, Tam, Arsenault, Lorna teach all the limitations of claim 1 as stated above except for a housing adapted in shape and size to enable hand-held use. Arsenault teaches a housing, (figure 5, the cover of element 12 is not different a housing. The limitation adapted in shape and size to enable hand-held use is just an intended used). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention was made to modify Tam by having a housing in order to make a cover for the device. Regarding Claim(s) 17, Tam, Arsenault, Lorna teach all the limitations of claim 1 as stated above. Further, Tam teaches a method of measuring a local parameter of an optical fiber element incorporating an array of fiber Bragg gratings, FBGs, wherein each FBG of the FBG array is located at a predetermined sensing location, the method comprising: a step of providing a measurement device according to claim 1, (figure 2); a step of optically connecting said optical fiber element to the light transmitting means of the measurement device (the above figures 2, 5, fiber AA); a step of providing electrical current pulses to the control input of said SOA (figures 2, 5, SOA 10a, 10d, 10e, pulse generator 20); However, Tam does not teach measuring the local parameter using said measurement device; receiving the local parameter being measured from said measurement device; and displaying the measured local parameter on a displaying means. Arsenault teaches measuring the local parameter using said measurement device; receiving the local parameter being measured from said measurement device ([0001-0003, 0013-0014, 0025, 0028-0029, 0041-0042, 0059-0062]), and displaying the measured local parameter on a displaying means ([0036]). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention was made to modify Tam by measuring the local parameter, receiving the local parameter, having displaying means, in order to measure and output information to users or machines, (Arsenault, [0030, 0036]). Fax/Telephone Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TRI T TON whose telephone number is (571)272-9064. The examiner can normally be reached on 8am-4pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michelle Iacoletti can be reached on (571)270-5789. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. February 19, 2026 /Tri T Ton/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 2877
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 23, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection (signed) — §103
Mar 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12633872
OUTDOOR PHOTOLUMINESCENCE IMAGING OF PHOTOVOLTAIC ARRAYS VIA OPTICAL STRING MODULATION
2y 5m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12618781
SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR DETECTING MATTRESS DEFECTS
1y 0m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12613188
Methods and Systems of Enhancing Electromagnetic Radiation Signals from Extracellular Vesicles
3y 6m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12613090
APPARATUS OF VISION CHROMATIC CONFOCAL SENSOR BASED ON A GEOMETRICAL PHASE LENS
2y 6m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12613196
BATTERY APPEARANCE DETECTION DEVICE AND BATTERY MANUFACTURING EQUIPMENT
9m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+11.0%)
2y 1m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1180 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month