Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 16, 2026
Application No. 18/837,923

Method and Apparatus for SSB Measurement Time Configuration in Communication Network

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 13, 2024
Priority
Feb 14, 2022 — CN PCT/CN2022/076233 +1 more
Examiner
PATEL, CHANDRAHAS B
Art Unit
2464
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
816 granted / 921 resolved
+30.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
946
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.0%
-32.0% vs TC avg
§103
40.5%
+0.5% vs TC avg
§102
40.9%
+0.9% vs TC avg
§112
5.7%
-34.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 921 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Specification The lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant’s cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 50-57 and 59-69 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Fu (USPN 12,262,267). Regarding claim 50, Fu teaches a method performed by a network node in a communication network, comprising: determining a first configuration for a synchronization signal block (SSB) measurement time, wherein SSB refers to a combination of synchronization signal and physical broadcast channel [Col. 5, lines 50-64, SMTC measurement is done which is measuring combination of synchronization signal and physical broadcast channel]; determining a second configuration for indicating an additional timing offset window to be applied to the SSB measurement time [Col. 5, lines 50 – Col. 6, line 2, additional offset window is used for SMTC/SSB measurement]; and transmitting the first configuration and the second configuration to a wireless device, for indicating that the wireless device performs a SSB measurement, based at least on the first configuration and the second configuration [Fig. 2 and Col. 7, lines 10-45, first and second configurations are used by the wireless device for SSB measurement]. Regarding claims 51, 61 and 68, Fu teaches the first configuration comprises: a periodicity, and a duration of the SSB measurement time [Col. 5, lines 50-64 and Col. 7, lines 10-45]; and the second configuration comprises: a timing offset window related to the duration of the SSB measurement time [Col. 5, lines 50-64 and Col. 7, lines 10-45]. Regarding claims 52, 62 and 69, Fu teaches the duration of the SSB measurement time is extended by the timing offset window, to start earlier compared to the first configuration; and/or the duration of the SSB measurement time is extended by the timing offset window, to end later compared to the first configuration [Col. 5, lines 50-64]. Regarding claims 53 and 63, Fu teaches the duration of the SSB measurement time is shifted by the timing offset window, to start earlier compared to the first configuration; or the duration of the SSB measurement time is shifted by the timing offset window, to end later compared to the first configuration [Col. 5, lines 50-64]. Regarding claims 54 and 64, Fu teaches the timing offset window is constant; or the timing offset window is periodically changeable with an update rate [Col. 5, lines 50-64]. Regarding claims 55 and 65, Fu teaches the second configuration is enabled or disabled, based at least on an indication from the network node, and/or a report from the wireless device, and/or a predefined rule [Col. 5, lines 50 – Col. 6, line 2]. Regarding claim 56, Fu teaches the first configuration and the second configuration are provided from a satellite to the wireless device [Col. 8, lines 12-43]; and the second configuration is determined, based at least on a location of the wireless device, an ephemeris data and/or feeder link delay of the satellite [Col. 8, lines 12-43]. Regarding claim 57, Fu teaches the second configuration is enabled or disabled for the wireless device, based on a change of at least one of following: a validity or invalidity of the ephemeris data, a validity or invalidity of the location of the wireless device, a type of the satellite, a location of at least one neighbor satellite, or a time to be covered by at least one neighbor satellite; or wherein the second configuration is enabled or disabled for the wireless device, based on at least one of the following: a capacity of the wireless device; or the first configuration [Col. 8, lines 32-43]. Regarding claim 59, Fu teaches a satellite or a base station relayed by the satellite [Fig. 1, 120]. Regarding claim 60, Fu teaches a method performed by a wireless device, comprising: receiving a first configuration and a second configuration from a network node in a communication network, wherein the first configuration is for a synchronization signal block (SSB) measurement time, and the second configuration is for indicating an additional timing offset window to be applied to the SSB measurement time [Col. 5, lines 50 – Col. 6, line 2]; and performing an SSB measurement based at least on the first configuration and the second configuration [Fig. 2 and Col. 7, lines 10-45]. Regarding claim 66, Fu teaches a network node in a communication network, the network node comprising: a processor [Fig. 10, 1001]; and a memory, the memory containing instructions executable by the processor, whereby the apparatus for the network node is configured to: determine a first configuration for a synchronization signal block (SSB) measurement time; wherein SSB refers to a combination of synchronization signal and physical broadcast channel [Col. 5, lines 50-64, SMTC measurement is done which is measuring combination of synchronization signal and physical broadcast channel]; determine a second configuration for indicating an additional timing offset window to be applied to the SSB measurement time [Col. 5, lines 50 – Col. 6, line 2, additional offset window is used for SMTC/SSB measurement]; and transmit the first configuration and the second configuration to a wireless device, for indicating that the wireless device performs a SSB measurement, based at least on the first configuration and the second configuration [Fig. 2 and Col. 7, lines 10-45, first and second configurations are used by the wireless device for SSB measurement]. Regarding claim 67, Fu teaches a wireless device comprising: a processor [Fig. 10, 1001]; and a memory, the memory containing instructions executable by the processor, whereby the apparatus for the wireless device is configured to: receive a first configuration and a second configuration from a network node in a communication network, wherein the first configuration is for a synchronization signal block (SSB) measurement time, and the second configuration is for indicating an additional timing offset window to be applied to the SSB measurement time [Col. 5, lines 50 – Col. 6, line 2]; and perform a SSB measurement, based at least on the first configuration and the second configuration [Fig. 2 and Col. 7, lines 10-45]. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 58 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Kim et al. (USPN 12,598,570) teaches determining whether to perform offset correction using a first target SSB to generate a determination result in response to a change in a selected receive beam from a first receive beam to a second receive beam in an SSB period. The first target SSB is received using the second receive beam. The offset correction on the second reception beam is carried out using at first neighbor SSB based on the determination result. The first neighbor SSB is received by the first reception beam. Wang et al. (US-PGPUB 2024/0306212) teaches acquiring the first SSB by the terminal device. A random-access preamble that corresponds to the first SSB is sent by the terminal device, where the random-access preamble is carried at a first-time domain position. The first-time domain location is associated with the timing offset value. The timing offset value is determined according to a round-trip delay between the first location in the area covered by a network device and the network device. Cui et al. (US-PGPUB 2024/0179758) teaches receiving a physical downlink control channel (PDCCH) comprising an order triggering a transmission of a contention free random access (CFRA) preamble and an indication of a synchronization signal block (SSB) from a base station. A timing offset value is determined for a random-access channel (RACH) occasion (RO) for the transmission of the CFRA preamble relative to the SSB. The SSB is received, and an arrival time of the signal block is determined. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHANDRAHAS PATEL whose telephone number is (571)270-1211. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday 7:30 - 17:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ricky Ngo can be reached at 571-272-3139. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Chandrahas B Patel/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2464
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 13, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12764569
MODULAR ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING DEVICE
3y 5m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12764734
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MANAGING FREQUENCY RESOURCE GROUP BASED SERVICE TRANSMISSIONS
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12764681
TECHNIQUES FOR ASSOCIATING MULTI-MODAL DATA IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS
2y 10m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12756530
TIMING FOR NON-OVERLAPPING SUB-BAND FULL DUPLEX (SBFD) OPERATIONS IN 5G NR
3y 0m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12756525
ENHANCED HYBRID AUTOMATIC REPEAT REQUEST ACKNOWLEDGEMENT/NEGATIVE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CONFIGURATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH INITIAL PHYSICAL DOWNLINK CONTROL CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+6.9%)
2y 7m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 921 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month