Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 30, 2026
Application No. 18/838,662

NETWORK DEVICE CAPABLE OF ACTING AS PTP MASTER AND METHOD PERFORMED THEREBY

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 15, 2024
Priority
Feb 28, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTCN2022078392
Examiner
JAHANGIR, KABIR U
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
409 granted / 466 resolved
+27.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
476
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.5%
-35.5% vs TC avg
§103
48.9%
+8.9% vs TC avg
§102
26.9%
-13.1% vs TC avg
§112
8.2%
-31.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 466 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Claims 18-32 are pending. Claims 1-17 and 33-34 are canceled. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 08/15/2024 and 12/23/2025 was filed. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Specification The lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant's cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 18-20, 23, 29-30 and 32 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Carlson et al. (EP 3745597, Carlson hereinafter, cited on IDS dated 12/23/2025). As to claim 18: Carlson discloses a method performed by a network device capable of acting as a precision time protocol, PTP, master, the network device comprising or connectable with a global navigation satellite system, GNSS, receiver for receiving a pulse timing signal (see at least paragraphs [003] and [0012], a time reference system that utilizes a computer network precision time protocol (PTP) to propagate a precision time reference signal (e.g., a 1 PPS signal from a GPS receiver or GNSS receiver) in a network.), the method comprising: detecting whether the received pulse timing signal is in abnormal status (see at least paragraph [0031], determine that timing reference signal (interpreted as pulse timing signal) in a fault condition.); generating and providing a normal pulse timing signal to a synchronization unit of the network device within a predetermined time period in response to detecting the received pulse timing signal to be in abnormal status (see at least paragraphs [0029]-0031] and Fig. 4, when the RVSC 408 determines that the timing reference signal (e.g., a 1 PPS signal) from the primary timing reference source is unavailable or otherwise in a fault condition (interpreted as abnormal status), the RVSC can automatically select a backup timing reference source. The selected backup timing reference is then used as a source of a timing reference signal to be communicated to the PI loop 409 (interpreted as synchronization unit).); and providing the received pulse timing signal to the synchronization unit in response to detecting the received pulse timing signal to be not in abnormal status (see at least paragraphs [0029]-[0031], when a timing reference signal (e.g., a 1 PPS signal) is available (interpreted as not in abnormal status) from the primary timing reference source (e.g., from GPS receiver 402), the RVSC 408 will communicate such primary timing reference signal to the phase error counter 410 in the PI loop 409 (interpreted as synchronization unit).). As to claim 19: Carlson discloses the method according to claim 18. Carlson further discloses wherein the abnormal status is a status where the received pulse timing signal is in outage (see at least paragraphs [0029]-0031] and Fig. 4, when the RVSC 408 determines that the timing reference signal (e.g., a 1 PPS signal) from the primary timing reference source is unavailable or otherwise in a fault condition (interpreted as abnormal status), the RVSC can automatically select a backup timing reference source. The selected backup timing reference is then used as a source of a timing reference signal to be communicated to the PI loop 409 (interpreted as synchronization unit).); and wherein the method further comprises: detecting whether the received pulse timing signal is recovered to be normal when the predetermined time period has elapsed (see at least paragraph [0038], in other scenarios a decision to switch timing reference at 508 may be based on a determination that a previously unavailable or faulty timing reference (e.g., GPS receiver 402) has once again become available, and/or is no longer experiencing a fault condition.); and triggering a first predetermined remedial operation when detecting the received pulse timing signal to be not recovered (see at least paragraph [0039], when a transition occurs from the first timing reference source to the second timing reference source, there will usually be a step timing change in the timing reference signal that is communicated to the PI loop. This step timing change represents the timing difference between the first timing reference source and the second timing reference source. Most often this step timing change will occur when reverting to a primary reference source such as GPS receiver 402 after a holdover period.). As to claim 20: Carlson discloses the method according to claim 19. Carlson further discloses wherein the first predetermined remedial operation comprises: a PTP holdover; or a switching to a backup clock source (see at least paragraph [0039], when a transition occurs from the first timing reference source to the second timing reference source, there will usually be a step timing change in the timing reference signal that is communicated to the PI loop. This step timing change represents the timing difference between the first timing reference source and the second timing reference source. Most often this step timing change will occur when reverting to a primary reference source such as GPS receiver 402 after a holdover period.). As to claim 23: Carlson discloses the method according to claim 19. Carlson further discloses further comprising: providing the received pulse timing signal to the synchronization unit when detecting the received pulse timing signal to be recovered (see at least paragraphs [0029]-[0031], when a timing reference signal (e.g., a 1 PPS signal) is available (interpreted as not in abnormal status) from the primary timing reference source (e.g., from GPS receiver 402), the RVSC 408 will communicate such primary timing reference signal to the phase error counter 410 in the PI loop 409 (interpreted as synchronization unit).). As to claim 29: Carlson discloses the method according to claim 18. Carlson further discloses wherein the synchronization unit is a PLL or a DPLL (see at least paragraphs [0029]-[0031], PI loop.). As to claim 30: Carlson discloses the method according to claim 18. Carlson further discloses wherein the pulse timing signal is a one pulse per second, 1PPS, signal (see at least paragraphs [0029]-0031] and Fig. 4, timing reference signal (e.g., a 1 PPS signal).). As to claim 32: Carlson discloses a network device capable of acting as a precision time protocol, PTP, master, the network device comprising or connectable with a global navigation satellite system, GNSS, receiver for receiving a pulse timing signal (see at least paragraphs [003] and [0012], a time reference system that utilizes a computer network precision time protocol (PTP) to propagate a precision time reference signal (e.g., a 1 PPS signal from a GPS receiver or GNSS receiver) in a network.), the network device comprising: at least one processor (see at least paragraph [0007], a computer network includes a processor); and at least one memory (see at least paragraph [0007], a computer network includes a memory), the at least one memory containing instructions executable by the at least one processor, whereby the network device is operative to: detect whether the received pulse timing signal is in abnormal status (see at least paragraph [0031], determine that timing reference signal (interpreted as pulse timing signal) in a fault condition.); generate and provide a normal pulse timing signal to a synchronization unit of the network device within a predetermined time period in response to detecting the received pulse timing signal to be in abnormal status (see at least paragraphs [0029]-0031] and Fig. 4, when the RVSC 408 determines that the timing reference signal (e.g., a 1 PPS signal) from the primary timing reference source is unavailable or otherwise in a fault condition (interpreted as abnormal status), the RVSC can automatically select a backup timing reference source. The selected backup timing reference is then used as a source of a timing reference signal to be communicated to the PI loop 409 (interpreted as synchronization unit).); and provide the received pulse timing signal to the synchronization unit in response to detecting the received pulse timing signal to be not in abnormal status (see at least paragraphs [0029]-[0031], when a timing reference signal (e.g., a 1 PPS signal) is available (interpreted as not in abnormal status) from the primary timing reference source (e.g., from GPS receiver 402), the RVSC 408 will communicate such primary timing reference signal to the phase error counter 410 in the PI loop 409 (interpreted as synchronization unit).). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 31 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Carlson et al. (EP 3745597, Carlson hereinafter, cited on IDS dated 12/23/2025) in view of Coulter, Robert (US 20190379474, Coulter hereinafter). As to claim 31: Carlson discloses the method according to claim 18. Carlson does not explicitly disclose wherein the network device acts as one of: a telecom grandmaster, T-GM; a telecom boundary clock, T-BC; and an assisted partial-support telecom boundary clock, T-BC-A. However Coulter discloses wherein the network device acts as one of: a telecom grandmaster, T-GM; a telecom boundary clock, T-BC; and an assisted partial-support telecom boundary clock, T-BC-A (see paragraph [0029], system 700 functions as a Telecom Boundary Clock (TBC).) Thus it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to implement Telecom Boundary Clock, as taught by Coulter, into the invention of Carlson in order to improve timing synchronization of the system (see Coulter, paragraph [0003]). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 21-22 and 24-28 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Mimura et al. (US 20090232197) discloses Pulse Modulated Wireless Communication Device. BIEDERMAN, Daniel Christian (US 20160080138) discloses Method And Apparatus For Timing Synchronization In A Distributed Timing System. Armstrong, Greg (US 11108400) discloses Hitless switching by resetting multi-modulus feedback divider. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KABIR U JAHANGIR whose telephone number is (571)272-0796. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 10am to 6:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ricky Ngo can be reached at (571)272-3139. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /K. J./ Examiner, Art Unit 2464 /RICKY Q NGO/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2464
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 15, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12720578
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR RECEIVING INFORMATION
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12720388
CELL HANDOVER METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND USER EQUIPMENT
3y 1m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12701491
DATA COMMUNICATION METHOD AND SYSTEM, DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 4m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12700938
CLOCK PROCESSING DEVICE AND PROGRAM
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12689930
CONFIGURATION OF SIGNAL MEASUREMENTS AT USER EQUIPMENT DURING IDLE PERIODS OF WIRELESS COMMUNICATION CHANNEL
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+8.8%)
2y 4m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 466 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month