Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/839,553

APPARATUS AND METHODS THEREIN, IN A COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 19, 2024
Priority
Mar 30, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTEP2022058508
Examiner
TRAN, QUOC DUC
Art Unit
2691
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ)
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
725 granted / 846 resolved
+23.7% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+4.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
861
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§103
72.0%
+32.0% vs TC avg
§102
19.3%
-20.7% vs TC avg
§112
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 846 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 5-6, 8-10, 12-14, 16-17 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Harrison et al (2019/0311480). Consider claims 1, 10 and 12, Harrison et al teach a method, apparatus and computer program product comprising a non-transitory computer readable medium storing instructions, which when executed by a processor, causes the processor to perform actions for controlling a zoom level of a video stream provided by a first computing device in a communications network, which video stream is displayed at least by a second computing device operating to provide a visual digital meeting, and which video stream is provided by a camera associated with the first computing device (par. 0006; “An intelligent communication device may be used for audio/visual communications, such as live or video chats or pre-recorded audio/visual presentations. The intelligent communication device may be a dedicated communication device that resides in a user's home or office. The intelligent communication device may have a touch sensitive display screen, speakers, one or more cameras, and one or more microphones. The device may access user information in accordance with privacy settings specified by the device's owner and each user that comes within the visual field of the device”; par. 0007; “The intelligent communication device may have internal processing that enables it to make automated cinematic decisions that imitate the cinematic decisions a human would make. Such cinematic decisions may include any choice a human director would make if she were controlling the camera(s) and microphone(s) (e.g., generating cinematic cuts), as well as any decision that might be available by way of a video editor (e.g., choosing to apply visual effects on the fly). Such choices may include zooming in on a single person if that person is talking and has specified that she allows the device to zoom in on her (e.g., in a privacy settings interface associated with the social-networking system), panning or cutting to another person, zooming out on a scene that has a lot of activity, beamforming a microphone to a particular sound source if the device owner and sound source(s) allow such functionality, and other suitable decisions. To make these determinations, an intelligent director may access a descriptive model of a current audio-visual communication session (“AV communication session”) between two or more users”), the method comprising: receiving from the second computing device a request for zooming the video stream to be displayed at the second computing device (par. 0034; “the intelligent communication device is displaying a scene with two people who are talking to each other and to a user participant associated with intelligent communication device 130. The intelligent communication device 130 allows the user to interact with it in various ways, including tapping on a particular object or person on the display screen and zoom in on that person or object. As an example and not by way of limitation, the user may tap somewhere inside box 310 if the user desires to zoom in on the person inside box 310”; thus the user request by tapping on the box 310), determining a type of the visual digital meeting (par. 0028; “par. 0092; “social graph 1700 includes an edge 1706 indicating a friend relation between user nodes 1702 of user “A” and user “B” and an edge indicating a friend relation between user nodes 1702 of user “C” and user “B.” Although this disclosure describes or illustrates particular edges 1706 with particular attributes connecting particular user nodes 1702, this disclosure contemplates any suitable edges 1706 with any suitable attributes connecting user nodes 1702. As an example and not by way of limitation, an edge 1706 may represent a friendship, family relationship, business or employment relationship, fan relationship (including, e.g., liking, etc.), follower relationship, visitor relationship (including, e.g., accessing, viewing, checking-in, sharing, etc.), subscriber relationship, superior/subordinate relationship, reciprocal relationship, non-reciprocal relationship, another suitable type of relationship, or two or more such relationships. Moreover, although this disclosure generally describes nodes as being connected, this disclosure also describes users or concepts as being connected”; thus implies that the audio/visual communication between the participant as personal or business), identifying presence of a face and/or object in the video stream provided by the camera (par. 0041; “The intelligent communication device 130 may determine which people in the room have opted in to sharing their social-networking information using facial or voice recognition, or any other suitable type of recognition”), deciding whether or not the request for zooming fulfils one or more first criteria based on the determined type of the visual digital meeting and the identified presence of the face and/or object in the video stream, when the request for zooming fulfils the one or more first criteria allowing the requested zooming of the video stream to be displayed at the second computing device (par. 0028; 0034; “Such cinematic decisions may include any choice a human director would make if she were controlling the camera(s) and microphone(s) (e.g., generating cinematic cuts), as well as any decision that might be available by way of a video editor (e.g., choosing to apply visual effects on the fly). Such choices may include zooming in on a single person if that person is talking and has specified that she allows the device to zoom in on her (e.g., in a privacy settings interface associated with the social-networking system), panning or cutting to another person, zooming out on a scene that has a lot of activity, beamforming a microphone to a particular sound source, applying real-time special effects, and other suitable decisions. To make these determinations, an intelligent director may access a descriptive model of a current AV communication session between two or more users”; par. 0041; “The intelligent communication device 130 may determine which people in the room have opted in to sharing their social-networking information using facial or voice recognition, or any other suitable type of recognition. The device 130 initially accesses a privacy log that has been expressly configured by the user. It may do this without accessing the user's identity because unique identifying data associated with the user's face or voice is stored in association with the privacy log so that the system can determine which log to access, but the user's name and other personal information is not stored with the privacy log. Only when the user has expressly allowed the sharing of social networking information with the device 130 may the device access the social-networking information stored in the social graph. Here, information is only pulled from the social graph—no information about any user is sent by the device to any remote server or any other remote device. If no privacy settings exist for a particular person (e.g., because they are not a user of the social-networking system), the device will not perform access on the person. If a person appears frequently and/or prominently in an AV communication session, the intelligent director may determine that she is important to the other participants in the AV communication session. She may even be the owner of the intelligent communication device. Thus, the intelligent director may instruct the camera and microphone to focus on her more than other people in the room, who may appear less frequently or less prominently”), and when the request for zooming does not fulfil the one or more first criteria denying the requested zooming of the video stream from being displayed at the second computing device (par. 0028; 0034; “if a first user has expressly specified that he or she allows a “following feature,” a second user may tap on the screen of the device at a location corresponding to the first user, and the second user's tap may cause the intelligent communication device to follow the second user as he moves around the environment while still maintaining a tight, zoomed-in view of the second user. The first user's tap may also cause the audio coming from the person to be amplified relative to other noises in the environment, if the second user has expressly opted in to allowing his or her voice to be amplified relative to other sounds”; par. 0052; “A participant may also set various privacy preferences. For example, a participant may specify that the intelligent communication device never send visual data of the participant's bathroom (which may be visible by the intelligent communication device). As another example, a participant may specify that the intelligent director never identify her using social-networking data or by any other means. The participant may elect to block the social-networking system interface 135 from accessing information related to the user on the social graph. As another example and not by way of limitation, a user may set privacy preferences with the online social network that will be followed by the intelligent communication device”). Consider claims 2 and 13, Harrison et al teach wherein the method is performed by the first computing device, the second computing device, or a server node managing the video stream (par. 0028; “The intelligent director may reside in the intelligent communication device or it may reside in a remote server”). Consider claims 3 and 14, Harrison et al teach wherein the determining of the type of the visual digital meeting comprises determining any one or more out of: a relation between the first computing device and the second computing device, and a relation between a user of the first computing device and a user of the second computing device (par. 0028; “par. 0092; “social graph 1700 includes an edge 1706 indicating a friend relation between user nodes 1702 of user “A” and user “B” and an edge indicating a friend relation between user nodes 1702 of user “C” and user “B.” Although this disclosure describes or illustrates particular edges 1706 with particular attributes connecting particular user nodes 1702, this disclosure contemplates any suitable edges 1706 with any suitable attributes connecting user nodes 1702. As an example and not by way of limitation, an edge 1706 may represent a friendship, family relationship, business or employment relationship, fan relationship (including, e.g., liking, etc.), follower relationship, visitor relationship (including, e.g., accessing, viewing, checking-in, sharing, etc.), subscriber relationship, superior/subordinate relationship, reciprocal relationship, non-reciprocal relationship, another suitable type of relationship, or two or more such relationships. Moreover, although this disclosure generally describes nodes as being connected, this disclosure also describes users or concepts as being connected”). Consider claims 5 and 16, Harrison et al teach wherein the one or more first criteria based on the determined type of the visual digital meeting, and any identified presence of a face and/or object in the video stream comprise any one or more out of: whether or not presence of a face and/or object has been indicated by a first user of the first computing device to be hidden, whether or not a face identified as present belongs to a kid, whether or not a face identified as present belongs to a family member of the first user of the first computing device, whether or not the determined type of the visual digital meeting is associated with professional visual digital meeting, whether or not the determined type of the visual digital meeting is associated with private visual digital meeting, whether or not a determined relation between the first computing device and the second computing device is unknown, whether or not a determined relation between the first user of the first computing device and a second user of the second computing device is unknown (par. 0052; “A participant may also set various privacy preferences. For example, a participant may specify that the intelligent communication device never send visual data of the participant's bathroom (which may be visible by the intelligent communication device). As another example, a participant may specify that the intelligent director never identify her using social-networking data or by any other means. The participant may elect to block the social-networking system interface 135 from accessing information related to the user on the social graph. As another example and not by way of limitation, a user may set privacy preferences with the online social network that will be followed by the intelligent communication device”). Consider claims 6 and 17, Harrison et al teach wherein the determining of the type of the visual digital meeting is based on any one or more out of: meeting-associated email addresses of the visual digital meeting, a meeting subject of the visual digital meeting, a contact list of a first user of the first computing device, any one or more out of: an on-device and/or in-cloud photo album, friend lists, social network contact entries, of the first user of the first computing device (par. 0028; “par. 0092; “social graph 1700 includes an edge 1706 indicating a friend relation between user nodes 1702 of user “A” and user “B” and an edge indicating a friend relation between user nodes 1702 of user “C” and user “B.” Although this disclosure describes or illustrates particular edges 1706 with particular attributes connecting particular user nodes 1702, this disclosure contemplates any suitable edges 1706 with any suitable attributes connecting user nodes 1702. As an example and not by way of limitation, an edge 1706 may represent a friendship, family relationship, business or employment relationship, fan relationship (including, e.g., liking, etc.), follower relationship, visitor relationship (including, e.g., accessing, viewing, checking-in, sharing, etc.), subscriber relationship, superior/subordinate relationship, reciprocal relationship, non-reciprocal relationship, another suitable type of relationship, or two or more such relationships. Moreover, although this disclosure generally describes nodes as being connected, this disclosure also describes users or concepts as being connected”). Consider claim 8, Harrison et al teach wherein the second computing device, is a server device (par. 0125; “As example and not by way of limitation, computer system 1800 may be an embedded computer system, a system-on-chip (SOC), a single-board computer system (SBC) (such as, for example, a computer-on-module (COM) or system-on-module (SOM)), a desktop computer system, a laptop or notebook computer system, an interactive kiosk, a mainframe, a mesh of computer systems, a mobile telephone, a personal digital assistant (PDA), a server, a tablet computer system, an augmented/virtual reality device, or a combination of two or more of these”). Consider claims 9 and 20, Harrison et al teach wherein the request for zooming the displayed video stream to be displayed at the second computing device is a request for zooming in (par. 0028; “Such choices may include zooming in on a single person if that person is talking and has specified that she allows the device to zoom in on her”). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4, 7, 15 and 18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any response to this action should be mailed to: Mail Stop ____(explanation, e.g., Amendment or After-final, etc.) Commissioner for Patents P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, VA 22313-1450 Facsimile responses should be faxed to: (571) 273-8300 Hand-delivered responses should be brought to: Customer Service Window Randolph Building 401 Dulany Street Alexandria, VA 22314 Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to QUOC DUC TRAN whose telephone number is (571) 272-7511. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:30am - 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Duc Nguyen can be reached on (571) 272-7503. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Quoc D Tran/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2691 April 28, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 19, 2024
Application Filed
May 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12641197
SYSTEM FOR BROADCASTING VOLUMETRIC VIDEOCONFERENCES IN 3D ANIMATED VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT WITH AUDIO INFORMATION, AND PROCEDURE FOR OPERATING SAID DEVICE
2y 10m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12621410
PERSONAL CONTROL APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR SHARING INFORMATION IN A COLLABORATIVE WORKSPACE
2y 10m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12621382
CALL CLASSIFICATION THROUGH ANALYSIS OF DTMF EVENTS
1y 11m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12615346
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATIC DETECTION OF MEETING REGIONS AND FRAMING OF MEETING PARTICIPANTS WITHIN AN ENVIRONMENT
2y 11m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12615333
TECHNIQUE FOR ACCURATELY CHARACTERIZING DROPPED CALLS
1y 10m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+4.8%)
2y 6m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 846 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month