Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/839,951

METHOD OF MANUFACTURING A SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE AND SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 20, 2024
Priority
Feb 25, 2022 — DE 102022104563.3 +1 more
Examiner
VU, VU A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Ams-osram AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allowance Rate
1258 granted / 1362 resolved
+32.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
45 currently pending
Career history
1381
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
46.5%
+6.5% vs TC avg
§102
31.3%
-8.7% vs TC avg
§112
15.0%
-25.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1362 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 27-28, 30, and 34 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Tu et al. (U.S. Patent No. 8,664,026). Regarding to claim 27, Tu teaches a semiconductor structure comprising: an epitaxial semiconductor layer sequence (Fig. 2, element 20; column 2, line 16) comprising at least one p-doped semiconductor layer (Fig. 2, element 50; column 2, line 20); and a plurality of degassing channels (Fig. 2, element 24; column 2, line 36), wherein the degassing channels are widened crystal defects (Fig. 1 to Fig. 2, the degassing channels 24 are widened crystal defects 22), and wherein the degassing channels in the epitaxial semiconductor layer sequence extend from a main surface of the epitaxial semiconductor layer sequence up to at least the p-doped semiconductor layer (Fig. 2). Regarding to claim 28, Tu teaches the epitaxial semiconductor layer sequence comprises an active layer (Fig. 2, element 40; column 2, lines 20-21), which is configured to generate and/ or absorb electromagnetic radiation (light emitting diode generates electromagnetic radiation, which is light of visible wavelength range). Regarding to claim 30, Tu teaches degassing channels penetrate the p-doped semiconductor layer (Fig. 2). Regarding to claim 34, Tu teaches the degassing channels are at least partially filled with a dielectric (Fig. 3, element 70, column 3, line 8). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 18-23 and 25-26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tu et al. (U.S. Patent No. 8,664,026) in view of Gstrein et al. (U.S. Patent No. 12,036,578). Regarding to claim 18, Tu teaches a method for manufacturing a semiconductor structure, the method comprising: epitaxially depositing an epitaxial semiconductor layer sequence (Fig. 1, element 20; column 2, line 16) comprising at least one p-doped semiconductor layer including a p-dopant as passivating layer (Fig. 1, element 50; column 2, line 20); wet-chemical etching of the epitaxial semiconductor layer sequence so that degassing channels are formed along crystal defects in the epitaxial semiconductor layer sequence from a main surface of the epitaxial semiconductor layer sequence up to at least the p-doped semiconductor layer (Fig. 2, column 2, lines 36-40, the main surface is the bottom surface of layer 30); and removing portion of passivation from the epitaxial semiconductor layer sequence through the degassing channels (Fig. 2, portion of p-doped layer 50 associated with the degassing channel along the crystal defect 22 is removed). Tu does not disclose passivating agents in the passivation layer. Gstrein discloses passivating agents in a passivation layer (column 2, lines 8-15). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Tu in view of Gstrein to add passivating agents into the passivation layer in order to achieve good passivation (Gstrein, column 4, lines 23-26). As being modified, the passivating agents in the passivation layer is expelled from the epitaxial semiconductor layer when portion of the passivation layer is removed. Regarding to claim 19, Tu teaches the epitaxial semiconductor layer sequence comprises a nitride compound semiconductor material (column 4, line 18-20, gallium nitride). Regarding to claim 20, Tu teaches the epitaxial semiconductor layer sequence comprises an n-doped semiconductor layer, which is arranged between the p-doped semiconductor layer and the main surface of the epitaxial semiconductor layer sequence (Fig. 1, n-doped semiconductor layer 30 which is arranged between the p-doped semiconductor layer 50 and the main surface (bottom surface of stack 20) of the epitaxial semiconductor layer sequence 20). Regarding to claim 21, Tu teaches the crystal defects are formed as threading dislocations in the epitaxial semiconductor layer sequence during epitaxial deposition, and wherein the crystal defects have a main direction of extension corresponding to a growth direction of the epitaxial semiconductor layer sequence (Fig. 1, column 4, lines 30-32). Regarding to claim 22, Tu teaches the threading dislocations are formed as screw dislocations having a hollow core (Fig. 2). Regarding to claim 23, Tu teaches epitaxial depositing is performed such that the crystal defects in the epitaxial semiconductor layer sequence are formed in a random arrangement (Fig. 1). Regarding to claim 25, Tu teaches the main surface of the epitaxial semiconductor layer sequence is formed as a surface of an undoped top layer (Fig. 7, the main surface of the epitaxial semiconductor layer sequence is formed as a surface of undoped top layer 70). Regarding to claim 26, Tu as modified discloses the degassing channels are at least partially filled with a dielectric after the passivating agent has been expelled (Fig. 3). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 24, 29, and 31-33 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding to claim 24, the prior art fails to anticipate or render obvious the claimed limitations including “the p-dopant is activated by expelling the passivating agent” in combination with the limitations recited in claim 18. Regarding to claim 29, the prior art fails to anticipate or render obvious the claimed limitations including “the epitaxial semiconductor layer sequence comprises pores, which are arranged laterally around the degassing channels” in combination with the limitations recited in claim 27. Regarding to claim 31, the prior art fails to anticipate or render obvious the claimed limitations including “the p-doped semiconductor layer forms a layer of a tunnel junction” in combination with the limitations recited in claim 27. Pertinent Art For the benefits of the Applicant, US-9218954-B2, US-6784074-B2, US-8450190-B2, US-20100184279-A1, US-8741451-B2, US-11257974-B2, US-6069367-A, US-9178114-B2, and US-8513039-B2, are cited on the record as being pertinent to significant disclosure through some but not all claimed features of the defined invention. In particular, the references fail to discloses the limitations including “expelling the passivating agent from the epitaxial semiconductor layer sequence through the degassing channels.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VU A VU whose telephone number is (571)270-7467. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 8:00AM - 5:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, CHAD M DICKE can be reached at (571) 270-7996. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VU A VU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2897
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 20, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12751331
SEMICONDUCTOR CHIP, SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE, AND SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE INCLUDING THE SAME
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12751258
SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12751303
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING PACKAGING SUBSTRATE AND PACKAGING SUBSTRATE MANUFACTURED THEREBY
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12751123
MULTI-CHANNEL VISIBLE LIGHT COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745663
SINGULATION OF INTEGRATED CIRCUIT PACKAGE SUBSTRATES WITH GLASS CORES
3y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+6.6%)
1y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1362 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month