Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/840,408

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR FORMING AN ABSORBENT CORE WITH A PLEATED OUTER WRAP

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Aug 21, 2024
Priority
Feb 28, 2022 — provisional 63/268,619 +1 more
Examiner
PATWARDHAN, ABHISHEK A
Art Unit
1746
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Curt G. Joa Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
190 granted / 255 resolved
+9.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
290
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
90.3%
+50.3% vs TC avg
§102
2.9%
-37.1% vs TC avg
§112
5.2%
-34.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 255 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Election/Restrictions Claims 1-9, 19-23 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on 02/18/2026. Applicant's election with traverse of Group II in the reply filed on 02/18/2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that Groups I & II have unity of invention. This is not found persuasive because Group II does not require all the specific technical features of Group I. The only technical feature that the two groups have in common is the core drum. Further, the shared technical feature of the core drum is disclosed by Ukegawa (U.S PG Pub 20130025795A1), thus the shared technical feature does not make a contribution over the prior art (see Figure 3 of Ukegawa). The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 10-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 10 recites the limitation "the pleated web" in line 16. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 10 recites the limitation "the continuous pleated web layer" in line 22. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 10-18 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: the prior art of record does not reasonably show or suggest the claimed method of forming a wrapped absorbent structure. Specifically, the prior art as a whole does not reasonably show or suggest the steps of “forming a pleated web layer comprising one or more folds that overlap portions of the pleated web in a cross-machine direction, each of the one or more folds comprising a continuous fold running in the machine direction; and bonding the overlapped portions of the pleated web layer together to create substantially detachable or temporary bonds having a strength less than a separating force imparted by the absorbent material being exposed to a liquid; wherein the substantially detachable or temporary bonds retain the one or more folds in the continuous pleated web layer during forming of the wrapped absorbent structure and when the absorbent material is in a substantially dry state”, and even more specifically the steps of “bonding the overlapped portions of the pleated web layer together to create substantially detachable or temporary bonds having a strength less than a separating force imparted by the absorbent material being exposed to a liquid; wherein the substantially detachable or temporary bonds retain the one or more folds in the continuous pleated web layer during forming of the wrapped absorbent structure and when the absorbent material is in a substantially dry state”. While it is known in the prior art to form pleats on a web of material with one or more folds that overlap as disclosed by Ukegawa (U.S PG Pub 20130025795A1), the totality of the claimed invention is not reasonably shown or suggested by the prior art. Ukegawa is the closest prior art of record and discloses all the limitations of the instant claim, with the exception of the limitations as highlighted above. Beck (U.S PG Pub 20250162302A1) does teach the pleating steps as claimed, but it is not usable as prior art, since it has the same effective filing date as the instant application of 02/28/2022. Thus, the totality of the claimed invention is not reasonably shown or suggested by the prior art of record. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: US-10087575-B2, US-5076774-A, US-10987257-B2, US-5171388-A, US-20020105110-A1, US-20020056516-A1 – all drawn to methods and apparatus of forming an absorbent structure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ABHISHEK A PATWARDHAN whose telephone number is (571)272-8431. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday 7:30am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Orlando can be reached at (571)270-5038. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ABHISHEK A PATWARDHAN/Examiner, Art Unit 1746 /CARSON GROSS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1746
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 21, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12680318
JOINT SUPPORT INCLUDING ENCAPSULATED ADHESIVE
5y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12655371
PROCESS OF SEALING POLYVINYLALCOHOL FILMS
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12655332
TWO-PART EPOXY-BASED STRUCTURAL ADHESIVE COMPOSITION
2y 12m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12644024
LAMINATING ADHESIVE COMPOSITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12637599
Two-Component Polyurethane Adhesive Composition for Film Lamination in Hot Filling Application
2y 4m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+11.6%)
2y 6m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 255 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month