Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 14, 2026
Application No. 18/841,270

A SEAT PAN FOR AN AIRCRAFT SEAT

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 23, 2024
Priority
Apr 04, 2022 — GB 2204918.3 +1 more
Examiner
BONZELL, PHILIP J
Art Unit
3642
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Safran Seats Gb Limited
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
692 granted / 883 resolved
+26.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
906
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
48.5%
+8.5% vs TC avg
§102
26.9%
-13.1% vs TC avg
§112
20.3%
-19.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 883 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 7/8/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Marshall (US PgPub #2013/0229038). For Claim 1, figures 1-4 of Marshall ‘038 disclose an aircraft seat comprising: a seat pan (4), and a seat cushion, wherein the seat pan is arranged to be fixed to an aircraft seat base and to support the seat cushion of the aircraft seat, wherein: the seat pan comprises a corrugated portion (16) formed of a deformable material, the corrugated portion comprising a plurality of corrugations, the seat pan comprises a planar portion (10) positioned under a front part of the seat cushion, the corrugated portion is positioned further from the front part of the seat cushion than the planar portion, the deformable material is plastically deformable, the corrugated portion is configured to permanently deform under a vertical impact force to absorb energy from the vertical impact force, and the corrugated portion extends from a back edge of the seat pan such that the corrugated portion is positioned at the rear of the aircraft seat. For Claim 2, figures 1-4 and paragraph [0012] of Marshall ‘038 disclose that the corrugated portion is formed from metal sheet. For Claim 6, figures 1-4 of Marshall ‘038 disclose that the corrugations of the corrugated portion extend from a first side to a second side of the seat pan, the first side and the second side extending between a front edge and a back edge of the seat pan. For Claim 7, figures 1-4 of Marshall ‘038 disclose that each corrugation has a longitudinal axis, wherein a longitudinal axis of each corrugation is parallel to a front edge of the seat cushion when the seat cushion is in position on the seat pan. For Claim 8, figures 1-4 of Marshall ‘038 disclose that the corrugations are parallel to each other. For Claim 9, figures 1-4 of Marshall ‘038 disclose that each of the plurality of corrugations comprises vertically extending walls; and a distance between adjacent vertically extending walls of adjacent corrugations is the same or less than the distance between the vertically extending walls of each of the adjacent corrugations. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Marshall (US PgPub #2013/0229038). Marshall ‘038 discloses the claimed invention except for the planar portion and the corrugated portion being separable. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to make the planar and corrugated portions separately and fixed together, since it has been held that constructing a formerly integral structure in various elements involves only routine skill in the art. Nerwin v. Erlichman, 168 USPQ 177, 179. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see pages 4-6, filed 6/1/2026, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1 under 102 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of Marshall ‘038. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Marshall (US Patent #8266450) is included in the PTO-892 as being the patent of the Marshall ‘038 reference used above in the rejection. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PHILIP J BONZELL whose telephone number is (571)270-3663. The examiner can normally be reached 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joshua Michener can be reached at 571-272-1467. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PHILIP J BONZELL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3642 7/21/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 23, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Mar 26, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 27, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jun 01, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 08, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 10, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12703492
HIGH ALTITUDE PARAFOILS
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12691999
GYROSCOPICALLY STABILISED FIREFIGHTING AERIAL VEHICLES
5y 0m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12691648
STRUCTURAL SHELL
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12673770
BLENDED WING BODY TANKER AND METHOD OF USE
4y 4m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12672719
RECLINING SEATING UNIT WITH OPERATIVELY-LINKED POWER ACTUATORS
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+12.1%)
2y 10m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 883 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month