Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/841,270

A SEAT PAN FOR AN AIRCRAFT SEAT

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Aug 23, 2024
Priority
Apr 04, 2022 — GB 2204918.3 +1 more
Examiner
BONZELL, PHILIP J
Art Unit
3642
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Safran Seats Gb Limited
OA Round
2 (Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
687 granted / 876 resolved
+26.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
900
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
83.6%
+43.6% vs TC avg
§102
7.7%
-32.3% vs TC avg
§112
4.8%
-35.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 876 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Interpretation For Claim 1, the limitation “a corrugated portion formed of a deformable material, the corrugated portion comprising a plurality of corrugations, wherein the deformable material is plastically deformable, and wherein the corrugated portion is configured to permanently deform under a vertical impact force to absorb energy from the vertical impact force” is interpreted in its broadest sense. The claim does not specify any force threshold or material specifics, nor does it exclude elastic behavior at lower load levels. As such any material known to undergo permanent deformation under sufficient loading, including conventional structural materials such as metals or reinforced plastics, is considered to fall within the scope of the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hocks (EP #3862221). For Claim 1, figures 1-5 and paragraphs [0076 and 0103] of Hocks ‘221 disclose a seat pan (1), and a seat cushion (6), wherein the seat pan is arranged to be fixed to an aircraft seat base and to support a seat cushion of the aircraft seat, wherein the seat pan comprises a corrugated portion (2) formed of a deformable material, the corrugated portion comprising a plurality of corrugations, wherein the deformable material (reinforced plastic, metal) is plastically deformable (at some load, per claim interpretation above), and wherein the corrugated portion is configured to permanently deform under a vertical impact force to absorb energy from the vertical impact force. For Claim 2, figures 1-5 and paragraphs [0046 and 0101] of Hocks ‘221 disclose that the corrugated portion is formed from a metal sheet. For Claim 3, figures 1-5 and paragraphs [0076 and 0103] of Hocks ‘221 disclose that the seat pan further comprises a planar portion. For Claim 4, figures 1-5 and paragraphs [0076 and 0103] of Hocks ‘221 disclose that the planar portion is arranged to be positioned under a front part of the seat cushion, and the corrugated portion is arranged to be positioned further from the front part of the seat cushion than the planar portion. For Claim 5, figures 1-5 and paragraphs [0100-0102] of Hocks ‘221 disclose that the planar portion and the corrugated portion are constructed separately and fixed together to form the seat pan. For Claim 6, figures 1-5 and paragraphs [0070-0071 and 0076] of Hocks ‘221 disclose that the corrugation of the corrugated portion extend from a first side to a second side of the seat pan, the first side and the second side extending between a front edge and a back edge of the seat pan. For Claim 7, figures 1-5 and paragraphs [0070-0071 and 0076] of Hocks ‘221 disclose that each corrugation has a longitudinal axis, wherein a longitudinal axis of each corrugation is parallel to a front edge of the seat cushion when the seat cushion is in position on the seat pan. For Claim 8, figures 1-5 and paragraphs [0070-0071 and 0076] of Hocks ‘221 disclose that the corrugation are parallel to each other. For Claim 9, figures 1-5 and paragraphs [0076 and 0103] of Hocks ‘221 disclose that each of the plurality of corrugations comprises vertical extending walls; and a distance between the adjacent vertically extending walls of adjacent corrugations is the same as the distance between the vertically extending walls of each of the adjacent corrugations (according). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 3/26/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. With respect to the argument under 102, that Hocks ‘221 does not disclose that “the deformable material is plastically deformable, and wherein the corrugated portion is configured to permanently deform under a vertical impact force to absorb energy from the vertical impact force”, the Examiner respectfully disagrees. Per the Claim Interpretation above, there are no structural limitations claimed that the Hocks ‘221 reference discloses. As such at some force with the used reinforced plastics or metal the corrugated portion would plastically deform. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PHILIP J BONZELL whose telephone number is (571)270-3663. The examiner can normally be reached 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joshua Michener can be reached at 571-272-1467. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PHILIP J BONZELL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3642 4/22/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 23, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Mar 26, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 27, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12637199
FIXED-WING UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE HAVING A LARGE FUSELAGE
2y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12636970
HYBRID-ELECTRIC AND ALL-ELECTRIC AIRCRAFT POWER SYSTEMS
2y 1m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12630295
AIRCRAFT POWER PLANT WITH ELECTRIC MOTOR POWERED BY FUEL CELL
2y 5m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12623767
AIRCRAFT STRUCTURAL COMPONENT AND A METHOD OF FABRICATING AN AIRCRAFT STRUCTURAL COMPONENT
2y 6m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12617561
ROBOTIC MULTICOPTER SAMPLER FOR INFIELD CROP AND SOIL HEALTH SENSING AND TISSUE SAMPLE COLLECTION
1y 0m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+11.9%)
2y 10m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 876 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month