Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/843,088

TRENCH CUTTER AND METHOD FOR MAKING A CUT TRENCH IN THE GROUND

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Aug 30, 2024
Priority
Mar 01, 2022 — EU 22159510.1 +1 more
Examiner
TOLEDO-DURAN, EDWIN J
Art Unit
3678
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
BAUER Maschinen GmbH
OA Round
2 (Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
553 granted / 791 resolved
+17.9% vs TC avg
Strong +32% interview lift
Without
With
+32.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
47 currently pending
Career history
835
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
48.1%
+8.1% vs TC avg
§102
22.1%
-17.9% vs TC avg
§112
24.0%
-16.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 791 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION In response to remarks filed on 27 January 2026 Status of Claims Claims 1-15 are pending; Claims 1, 5 and 12-15 are currently amended; Claims 2-4 and 6-11 were previously presented; Claims 1-15 are rejected herein. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments filed on 27 January 2026 have been fully considered and they are moot as the reference has been reinterpreted in view of the new limitations. Terms like “mounted on”, “mounted to”, “arranged to” do not require direct contact and intermediate elements may be present. Examiner is relying on “one” for each of the “at least one” limitations for claim interpretation in regards to the Domanski reference. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Domanski et al (Europe Patent Publication No. 3,543,408 B1). As to Claim 1, Domanski discloses a trench cutter (10) comprising: A box-shaped housing (Annotated figures A and B, “housing”), on the upper face of which a lifting apparatus is mounted (Paragraph 0024: “Furthermore, it is preferred in a trench wall cutter according to the invention that at a top end of the trimming frame, a rope or a rod is attached, with which the trench wall cutter is suspended on a carrier device and vertically adjustable”), At least one cutting wheel (14, 15), which is arranged below a lower face of the housing (Annotated figures A and B, “housing”) and is driven in rotation to remove soil material, wherein cutting teeth (18, 20) are arranged along the outer circumference of the cutting wheel (14, 15) in at least one circumferential row, which at least one axial circumferential clearance adjoins, At least one clearing plate (Annotated figures A and B, “clearing plate”), which is arranged to be fixed relative to the housing (Annotated figures A and B, “housing”) and engages in the at least one circumferential clearance on the cutting wheel (14, 15) to clear away soil material (Paragraph 0030: “In order to remove adhering soil material, plate-shaped clearing plates 50 are attached to the underside of the milling frame 12 and engage in a comb-like manner in the annular spaces 24 between the cutting teeth 20 in order to mechanically scrape off adhering soil material”), wherein the at least one cutting wheel is mounted on a planar bearing plate (Annotated figures A and B, “bearing plate”) below the lower face of the housing (Annotated figures A and B, “housing”), wherein The at least one clearing plate (Annotated figures A and B, “clearing plate”) is mounted on a plate holder (Annotated figures A and B, “plate holder”), and the plate holder is mounted on the bearing plate (Annotated figures A and B, “bearing plate”); and The at least one clearing plate is mounted on the plate holder (Annotated figures A and B, “plate holder”) so as to be spaced apart from the housing (Annotated figures A and B, “housing”), and the plate holder is arranged so as to be spaced apart from the housing, and A passage (Annotated figure A, “passage”) is formed between (See “area between housing, clearing plate and plate holder” in annotated Figure A) the at least one clearing plate (Annotated figures A and B, “clearing plate”), the plate holder and the housing (Annotated figures A and B, “housing”), through which passage soil material that has been cut out during operation is guided upwards (Paragraph 0030: “The clearing plates 50 are attached to both sides of a central discharge device 30, which is designed to suck off milling fluid from the milling slot that has been created. The discharge device 30 has a suction box 32 which extends parallel to the axes of rotation and tapers downwards. On its underside, the suction box 32 is provided with a plurality of suction openings 34, as can be seen Fig. 3 can be found”). PNG media_image1.png 813 944 media_image1.png Greyscale Figure A. Trench cutter (Domanski) PNG media_image2.png 880 1328 media_image2.png Greyscale Figure B. Trench cutter (Domanski) As to Claim 2, Domanski discloses the invention of Claim 1 (Refer to Claim 1 discussion). Domanski also discloses wherein at least two circumferential rows (Figure 3) of cutting teeth (18, 20) are arranged on the at least one cutting wheel (14, 15), which teeth are axially spaced apart from one another by a circumferential clearance, in which a clearing plate (Annotated figures A and B, “clearing plate”) engages (Figure 3). As to Claim 3, Domanski discloses the invention of Claim 1 (Refer to Claim 1 discussion). Domanski also discloses wherein two pairs (Figure 3 shows two pairs of wheels 15 and two pairs of wheels 16 each divided by plates 11a and 11b) of cutting wheels (14, 15) are arranged on the lower face of the housing (Annotated figures A and B, “housing”). As to Claim 4, Domanski discloses the invention of Claim 3 (Refer to Claim 3 discussion). Domanski also discloses wherein from of each pair of cutting wheels (14, 15), one cutting wheel is mounted on one side of the bearing plate (Annotated figures A and B, “bearing plate”) and in that at least one clearing plate (Annotated figures A and B, “clearing plate”), which is mounted on the bearing plate by means of a plate holder (Annotated figures A and B, “plate holder”), is assigned to each cutting wheel (40). As to Claim 5, Domanski discloses the invention of Claim 4 (Refer to Claim 4 discussion). Domanski also discloses wherein one of the passage (Annotated figure A, “passage”), which is delimited by the housing (Annotated figures A and B, “housing”), the bearing plate (Annotated figures A and B, “bearing plate”) and the assigned at least one clearing plate (Annotated figures A and B, “clearing plate”) with the plate holder (Annotated figures A and B, “plate holder”), is assigned to each cutting wheel (14, 15). As to Claim 6, Domanski discloses the invention of Claim 1 (Refer to Claim 1 discussion). Domanski also discloses wherein a supply system (40) for supplying a liquid, in particular a curable suspension, is arranged. As to Claim 7, Domanski discloses the invention of Claim 6 (Refer to Claim 6 discussion). Domanski also discloses wherein the supply system (40) is arranged between two pairs of cutting wheels (14, 15) and/or in at least one of the plate holders (30, 32). As to Claim 8, Domanski discloses the invention of Claim 1 (Refer to Claim 1 discussion). Domanski also discloses an outer circumference of the housing (Annotated figures A and B, “housing”) is smaller than a cutting cross section of the cutting wheels (14, 15). As to Claim 9, Domanski discloses the invention of Claim 1 (Refer to Claim 1 discussion). Domanski also discloses a drive apparatus (Equipment inside housing), in particular a hydraulic motor or an electric motor, is arranged in the housing for driving the cutting wheels (14, 15). As to Claim 10, Domanski discloses the invention of Claim 1 (Refer to Claim 1 discussion). Domanski also discloses the at least one cutting wheel (14, 15) comprises a hub (17), in which a hub motor is arranged. As to Claim 11, Domanski discloses the invention of Claim 1 (Refer to Claim 1 discussion). Domanski also discloses the at least one clearing plate (Annotated figures A and B, “clearing plate”) and/or the plate holder (Annotated figures A and B, “plate holder”) are detachably fastened and a connecting system for at least one clearing plate (Annotated figures A and B, “clearing plate”) is provided on the lower face of the housing (Every structural element of the clearing plates and wheels are provided on the lower face of the housing as per the figures). As to Claim 12, Domanski discloses a trench cutter device comprising carrier equipment (12), on which the trench cutter (10) according to Claim 1 (Refer to Claim 1 discussion). is arranged to be vertically movable by the lifting apparatus. As to Claim 13, Domanski discloses a method for making a cut trench in the ground, the method comprising utilizing the trench cutter (10) according to Claim 1 (Refer to Claim 1 discussion). As to Claim 14, Domanski discloses the invention of Claim 13 (Refer to Claim 13 discussion). Domanski also discloses driving the at least one cutting wheel (15, 16) in rotation in a rotational direction, and guiding cut-out soil material through the passage (Annotated figure A, “passage”) between the housing (Annotated figures A and B, “housing”) and the clearing plate (Annotated figures A and B, “clearing plate”) using the at least one clearing plate (Annotated figures A and B, “clearing plate”). As to Claim 15, Domanski discloses a method for making a cut trench in the ground, the method comprising utilizing the trench cutter (10) device according to Claim 12 (Refer to Claim 12 discussion). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EDWIN J TOLEDO-DURAN whose telephone number is (571)270-7501. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday: 10:00AM to 6:00PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, AMBER ANDERSON can be reached at (571) 270-5281. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /EDWIN J TOLEDO-DURAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3678
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 30, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 09, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jan 27, 2026
Response Filed
May 11, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Aug 06, 2026
Interview Requested
Aug 12, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Aug 12, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12703018
ULTRAFAST FLASH JOULE HEATING SYNTHESIS METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR PERFORMING SAME
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12680254
Piling Machine
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673750
Eccentric Suction Pile Pump with Hinged Lift Appliance
4y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12663099
DEVICE AND METHOD FOR ERECTING SUBMARINE PIPELINES IN MARINE ENGINEERING
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12655340
COMBINED TREATMENT PROCESS FOR REMOVING AND INHIBITING SCALE
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+32.3%)
2y 6m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 791 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month