Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

BAUER Maschinen GmbH

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 7 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

BAUER Maschinen GmbH manages 4 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These matters are distributed across 3 distinct art units, showing a range of technical classifications for the company's filings. The prosecution involves 4 distinct examiners, meaning each pending action is handled by a different person. This distribution requires the company to manage 4 separate interactions with patent office personnel during the prosecution process.

The busiest examiner is HALL, KRISTYN A, who handles 1 pending office action. This workload is the same for all 4 examiners involved, as the 4 pending actions are spread. With 4 pending actions across 3 art units, the company must navigate several different examination groups within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field. Managing 4 distinct examiners without any overlap requires a strategy that accounts for 4 different sets of examiner feedback. The 3 art units involved indicate that the company's 4 pending actions are grouped into specific technical categories. This structure requires the company to maintain consistency in its arguments while addressing the unique requirements of 4 different examiners and 3 different art units.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
67% of docket
1
Business / Other
33% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
FIORELLO, BENJAMIN F 1 73.9% +7.4%
BUCK, MATTHEW R 1 83.3% +14.4%
ANDRISH, SEAN D 1 71.5% +32.1%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19051941 DEVICE FOR PRODUCING A MATERIAL COLUMN IN THE GROUND AND METHOD FOR FILLING THE DEVICE FIORELLO, BENJAMIN F —
18993775 CUTTING WHEEL FOR A DIAPHRAGM WALL CUTTER AND METHOD FOR CONVERTING A CUTTING WHEEL BUCK, MATTHEW R —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17997017 WORKING MACHINE AND METHOD FOR WORKING THE GROUND ANDRISH, SEAN D 17d overdue
18993775 CUTTING WHEEL FOR A DIAPHRAGM WALL CUTTER AND METHOD FOR CONVERTING A CUTTING WHEEL BUCK, MATTHEW R —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3671 1
3678 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19051941 DEVICE FOR PRODUCING A MATERIAL COLUMN IN THE GROUND AND METHOD FOR FILLING THE DEVICE FIORELLO, BENJAMIN F — §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 12, 2025
18993775 CUTTING WHEEL FOR A DIAPHRAGM WALL CUTTER AND METHOD FOR CONVERTING A CUTTING WHEEL BUCK, MATTHEW R 3671 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 13, 2025
17997017 WORKING MACHINE AND METHOD FOR WORKING THE GROUND ANDRISH, SEAN D 3678 §103 Non-Final OA 17d overdue Pending Oct 24, 2022

Managing BAUER Maschinen GmbH's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month