Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/843,562

FILM MANUFACTURING METHOD, FILM, WOUND BODY, CONNECTION STRUCTURE, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING CONNECTION STRUCTURE, AND REMOVING DEVICE

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Sep 03, 2024
Priority
Mar 04, 2022 — JP 2022-033679 +2 more
Examiner
NORDMEYER, PATRICIA L
Art Unit
1788
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
RESONAC Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
56%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 56% of resolved cases
56%
Career Allowance Rate
658 granted / 1164 resolved
-8.5% vs TC avg
Strong +37% interview lift
Without
With
+37.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
62 currently pending
Career history
1210
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
50.5%
+10.5% vs TC avg
§102
23.0%
-17.0% vs TC avg
§112
16.8%
-23.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1164 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Withdrawn Rejections Any rejections and/or objections, made in the previous Office Action, and not repeated below, are hereby withdrawn due to Applicant’s amendments and/or arguments in the response dated August 26, 2026. However, new rejections may have been made using the same prior art if still applicable to the newly presented amendments and/or arguments. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 12 – 20, 23, 25 – 28 and 40 – 42 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and (a)(2) as being anticipated by Downs et al. (USPGPub 2005/0084641 A1). Downs et al. disclose a film (Figures; Abstract) comprising: a long release film (Figures 1 – 3 and 6, #32); a plurality of adhesive film pieces which are provided on the release film and separated from each other (Figures 1 – 3, #34); and a non-adhesive region which is provided on the release film not to have the plurality of adhesive film pieces (Figures 1 – 3, #34, the spaces between the adhesive); and a half cut that is formed in the release film (Paragraph 0062, wherein the perforations may be tear folds or lines; Figure 4, #54; Figure 5, #84; Figure 9, #98), wherein the plurality of adhesive film pieces include a first adhesive film piece and a second adhesive film piece which are adjacent to each other through the non-adhesive region and a third adhesive film piece and a fourth adhesive film piece which are adjacent to each other through the non-adhesive region (Figures 1 – 5, #34, Figure 9, #94), and wherein a separation distance between the first adhesive film piece and the second adhesive film piece is different from a separation distance between the third adhesive film piece and the fourth adhesive film piece (Figures 1 – 5, #34, Figure 9, #94; Paragraph 0022, 0056, 0057, 0071, 0073), and wherein the half cut is formed in the non-adhesive region between the first adhesive film piece and the second adhesive film piece (Paragraph 0062, wherein the perforations may be tear folds or lines; Figure 4, #54; Figure 5, #84; Figure 9, #98), and the half cut is spaced apart from the first adhesive film piece and from the second adhesive film piece (Paragraph 0062, wherein the perforations may be tear folds or lines; Figure 4, #54; Figure 5, #84; Figure 9, #98) as in claim 12. With respect to claim 13, the first adhesive film piece and the second adhesive film piece are adjacent to each other in a longitudinal direction of the release film, and wherein the third adhesive film piece and the fourth adhesive film piece are adjacent to each other in the longitudinal direction (Figures 1 – 5, #34, Figure 9, #94; Paragraph 0022, 0056, 0057, 0071, 0073). Regarding claim 14, the first adhesive film piece and the second adhesive film piece are adjacent to each other in a width direction of the release film, and wherein the third adhesive film piece and the fourth adhesive film piece are adjacent to each other in the width direction (Figures 1 – 5, #34, Figure 9, #94; Paragraph 0022, 0056, 0057, 0071, 0073). For claim 15, the non-adhesive region has a first region in which a separation distance between the adjacent adhesive film pieces is longer than the adhesive film piece (Figures 1 – 5, #34, Figure 9, #94; Paragraph 0022, 0056, 0057, 0071, 0073). In claim 16, the non-adhesive region has a second region in which a separation distance between the adjacent adhesive film pieces is shorter than the adhesive film piece (Figures 1 – 5, #34, Figure 9, #94; Paragraph 0022, 0056, 0057, 0071, 0073). With regard to claim 17, the non-adhesive region has a third region in which a separation distance between the adjacent adhesive film pieces is shorter than the separation distance between the adjacent adhesive film pieces in the first region (Figures 1 – 5, #34, Figure 9, #94; Paragraph 0022, 0056, 0057, 0071, 0073). As in claim 18, a separation distance between the first adhesive film piece and the second adhesive film piece is longer than a maximum length of the first adhesive film piece and the second adhesive film piece in a direction in which the first adhesive film piece and the second adhesive film piece are separated from each other (Figures 1 – 5, #34, Figure 9, #94; Paragraph 0022, 0056, 0057, 0071, 0073). With respect to claim 19, a separation distance between the third adhesive film piece and the fourth adhesive film piece is shorter than a maximum length of the third adhesive film piece and the fourth adhesive film piece in a direction in which the third adhesive film piece and the fourth adhesive film piece are separated from each other (Figures 1 – 5, #34, Figure 9, #94; Paragraph 0022, 0056, 0057, 0071, 0073). Regarding claim 20, a separation distance between the third adhesive film piece and the fourth adhesive film piece is shorter than the separation distance between the first adhesive film piece and the second adhesive film piece (Figures 1 – 5, #34, Figure 9, #94; Paragraph 0022, 0056, 0057, 0071, 0073). In claim 23, the plurality of adhesive film pieces form a plurality of adhesive film piece groups arranged in the longitudinal direction of the release film, and wherein the arrangement of the adhesive film pieces is the same in the plurality of adhesive film piece groups (Figures 1 – 5, #34, Figure 9, #94; Paragraph 0022, 0056, 0057, 0071, 0073). As in claim 25, the plurality of adhesive film pieces are separated from the edges of the release film in the width direction of the release film (Figures 1 – 5, #34). With respect to claim 26, the plurality of adhesive film pieces are arranged in one row in the longitudinal direction of the release film (Figures 1 – 5, #34, Figure 9, #94; Paragraph 0022, 0056, 0057, 0071, 0073). Regarding claim 27, at least a part of the plurality of adhesive film pieces has a hole (Figures 1 – 5, #34, Figure 9, #94; Paragraph 0022, 0056, 0057, 0071, 0073, wherein the adhesive may take on a variety of shapes). For claim 28, the plurality of adhesive film pieces have the same shape (Figures 1 – 5, #34; Paragraph 0022, 0056, 0057, 0071, 0073). For claim 40, the half cut does not surround either the first adhesive film piece or the second adhesive film piece (Paragraph 0062, wherein the perforations may be tear folds or lines; Figure 4, #54; Figure 5, #84; Figure 9, #98, wherein the tear lines may take a variety of arrangements). In claim 41, the first adhesive film piece and the second adhesive film piece are located outside the half cut (Paragraph 0062, wherein the perforations may be tear folds or lines; Figure 4, #54; Figure 5, #84; Figure 9, #98, wherein the tear lines may take a variety of arrangements). With regard to claim 42, at least the first adhesive film piece and the second adhesive film piece have the same shape, the half cut has the same shape as an outer shape of the adhesive film piece and the second adhesive film piece, and all of the half cut is formed in the non-adhesive region between the first adhesive film piece and the second adhesive film piece (Paragraph 0062, wherein the perforations may be tear folds or lines; Figure 4, #54; Figure 5, #84; Figure 9, #98, wherein the tear lines may take a variety of arrangements). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 12 – 20, 22 – 30, and 40 – 42 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tatsuzawa et al. (WO 2018/066411 A1) in view of Downs et al. (USPGPub 2005/0084641 A1). This rejection is over the Tatsuzawa et al. (WO 2018/066411 A1) because this reference qualifies as prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102(b). However, for convenience, the column and line numbers of the English language equivalent US Patent No. 11,667,817 will be cited below. Tatsuzawa et al. disclose a film (Figures; Abstract) comprising: a long release film (Figure 2, #4); a plurality of adhesive film pieces which are provided on the release film and separated from each other (Figure 2, #5); and a non-adhesive region which is provided on the release film not to have the plurality of adhesive film pieces (Figure 2, spaces in between #2), wherein the plurality of adhesive film pieces include a first adhesive film piece and a second adhesive film piece which are adjacent to each other through the non-adhesive region and a third adhesive film piece and a fourth adhesive film piece which are adjacent to each other through the non-adhesive region (Figure 17C, #5), and wherein a separation distance between the first adhesive film piece and the second adhesive film piece is different from a separation distance between the third adhesive film piece and the fourth adhesive film piece Column 11, lines 4 – 15; Figure 17C; Column 10, line 18 – 27) as in claim 12. With respect to claim 13, the first adhesive film piece and the second adhesive film piece are adjacent to each other in a longitudinal direction of the release film, and wherein the third adhesive film piece and the fourth adhesive film piece are adjacent to each other in the longitudinal direction (Column 11, lines 4 – 15; Figure 17C; Column 10, line 18 – 27). Regarding claim 14, the first adhesive film piece and the second adhesive film piece are adjacent to each other in a width direction of the release film, and wherein the third adhesive film piece and the fourth adhesive film piece are adjacent to each other in the width direction (Column 11, lines 4 – 15; Figure 17C; Column 10, line 18 – 27). For claim 15, the non-adhesive region has a first region in which a separation distance between the adjacent adhesive film pieces is longer than the adhesive film piece (Column 11, lines 4 – 15; Figure 17C; Column 10, line 18 – 27). In claim 16, the non-adhesive region has a second region in which a separation distance between the adjacent adhesive film pieces is shorter than the adhesive film piece (Column 11, lines 4 – 15; Figure 17C; Column 10, line 18 – 27). With regard to claim 17, the non-adhesive region has a third region in which a separation distance between the adjacent adhesive film pieces is shorter than the separation distance between the adjacent adhesive film pieces in the first region (Column 11, lines 4 – 15; Figure 17C; Column 10, line 18 – 27). As in claim 18, a separation distance between the first adhesive film piece and the second adhesive film piece is longer than a maximum length of the first adhesive film piece and the second adhesive film piece in a direction in which the first adhesive film piece and the second adhesive film piece are separated from each other (Column 11, lines 4 – 15; Figure 17C; Column 10, line 18 – 27). With respect to claim 19, a separation distance between the third adhesive film piece and the fourth adhesive film piece is shorter than a maximum length of the third adhesive film piece and the fourth adhesive film piece in a direction in which the third adhesive film piece and the fourth adhesive film piece are separated from each other (Column 11, lines 4 – 15; Figure 17C). Regarding claim 20, a separation distance between the third adhesive film piece and the fourth adhesive film piece is shorter than the separation distance between the first adhesive film piece and the second adhesive film piece (Column 11, lines 4 – 15; Figure 17C). For claim 22, the third adhesive film piece and the fourth adhesive film piece are adjacent to each other in the longitudinal direction of the release film, and wherein a separation distance between the third adhesive film piece and the fourth adhesive film piece in the longitudinal direction is 20 mm or less (Column 11, lines 4 – 15; Figure 17C; Column 10, lines 40 – 55). In claim 23, the plurality of adhesive film pieces form a plurality of adhesive film piece groups arranged in the longitudinal direction of the release film, and wherein the arrangement of the adhesive film pieces is the same in the plurality of adhesive film piece groups (Figure 17C; Column 10, lines 40 – 55). With regard to claim 24, a separation distance between the adhesive film piece groups adjacent to each other in the longitudinal direction of the release film is 20 mm or less (Column 11, lines 4 – 15). As in claim 25, the plurality of adhesive film pieces are separated from the edges of the release film in the width direction of the release film (Figures 2, 4, 12 – 14, and 16 – 18; Column 10, line 28 – 30). With respect to claim 26, the plurality of adhesive film pieces are arranged in one row in the longitudinal direction of the release film (Figure 2, 4, 12 – 14, 16, and 18; Column 10, lines 40 – 41). Regarding claim 27, at least a part of the plurality of adhesive film pieces has a hole (Figure 18; Column 9, line 51 to Column 10, line 17). For claim 28, the plurality of adhesive film pieces have the same shape (Column 10, lines 18 – 19; Figures 2, 4, 12 – 14, and 16 – 18). In claim 29, the adhesive film piece is conductive (Column 8, lines 9 – 11; Column 9, lines 4 – 16). In claim 30, the adhesive film piece contains conductive particles (Column 8, lines 9 – 11; Column 9, lines 4 – 16). However, Tatsuzawa et al. fail to disclose half cut that is formed in the release film, the half cut is formed in the non-adhesive region between the first adhesive film piece and the second adhesive film piece, and the half cut is spaced apart from the first adhesive film piece and from the second adhesive film piece, the half cut does not surround either the first adhesive film piece or the second adhesive film piece, the first adhesive film piece and the second adhesive film piece are located outside the half cut, at least the first adhesive film piece and the second adhesive film piece have the same shape, the half cut has the same shape as an outer shape of the adhesive film piece and the second adhesive film piece, and all of the half cut is formed in the non-adhesive region between the first adhesive film piece and the second adhesive film piece. Downs et al. teach a film (Figures; Abstract) comprising: a long release film (Figures 1 – 3 and 6, #32); a plurality of adhesive film pieces which are provided on the release film and separated from each other (Figures 1 – 3, #34); and a non-adhesive region which is provided on the release film not to have the plurality of adhesive film pieces (Figures 1 – 3, #34, the spaces between the adhesive), wherein the plurality of adhesive film pieces include a first adhesive film piece and a second adhesive film piece which are adjacent to each other through the non-adhesive region and a third adhesive film piece and a fourth adhesive film piece which are adjacent to each other through the non-adhesive region (Figures 1 – 5, #34, Figure 9, #94), and wherein a separation distance between the first adhesive film piece and the second adhesive film piece is different from a separation distance between the third adhesive film piece and the fourth adhesive film piece (Figures 1 – 5, #34, Figure 9, #94; Paragraph 0022, 0056, 0057, 0071, 0073), and wherein the half cut is formed in the non-adhesive region between the first adhesive film piece and the second adhesive film piece (Paragraph 0062, wherein the perforations may be tear folds or lines; Figure 4, #54; Figure 5, #84; Figure 9, #98), and the half cut is spaced apart from the first adhesive film piece and from the second adhesive film piece (Paragraph 0062, wherein the perforations may be tear folds or lines; Figure 4, #54; Figure 5, #84; Figure 9, #98), the half cut does not surround either the first adhesive film piece or the second adhesive film piece (Paragraph 0062, wherein the perforations may be tear folds or lines; Figure 4, #54; Figure 5, #84; Figure 9, #98, wherein the tear lines may take a variety of arrangements), the first adhesive film piece and the second adhesive film piece are located outside the half cut (Paragraph 0062, wherein the perforations may be tear folds or lines; Figure 4, #54; Figure 5, #84; Figure 9, #98, wherein the tear lines may take a variety of arrangements), and at least the first adhesive film piece and the second adhesive film piece have the same shape, the half cut has the same shape as an outer shape of the adhesive film piece and the second adhesive film piece, and all of the half cut is formed in the non-adhesive region between the first adhesive film piece and the second adhesive film piece (Paragraph 0062, wherein the perforations may be tear folds or lines; Figure 4, #54; Figure 5, #84; Figure 9, #98, wherein the tear lines may take a variety of arrangements) for the purpose of dispensing adhesive from a sheet (Abstract). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the half cuts in Tatsuzawa et al. in order to dispense adhesive from a sheet as taught by Downs et al. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 12 – 20, 22 – 30, and 40 – 42 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Please see the newly presented rejections in view of Downs et al. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Patricia L Nordmeyer whose telephone number is (571)272-1496. The examiner can normally be reached 10am - 6:30pm EST, Monday - Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alicia Chevalier can be reached at 571-272-1490. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Patricia L. Nordmeyer/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 1788 /pln/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1788 September 10, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 03, 2024
Application Filed
May 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Aug 26, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 15, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12708573
ADHESIVE TAPE ASSEMBLIES
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12673779
LOW EMISSIVITY MATERIAL FOR INFLATABLE SAFETY PRODUCTS
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12662819
ROOF MEMBRANE WITH A FOLDED RELEASE LINER
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12661871
WINDSHIELD PROTECTOR AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURING AND USING SAME
1y 12m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12655324
SEAL MEMBER
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
56%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+37.2%)
2y 11m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1164 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month