Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/845,478

NETWORK FUNCTION DELEGATED DISCOVERY AND SELECTION

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 10, 2024
Examiner
DAILEY, THOMAS J
Art Unit
2458
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ)
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 4m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
694 granted / 859 resolved
+22.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
886
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
11.8%
-28.2% vs TC avg
§103
50.3%
+10.3% vs TC avg
§102
18.8%
-21.2% vs TC avg
§112
11.5%
-28.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 859 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-8, 10-17, and 19-22 are pending. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1-3, 10-12, and 19-22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Huawei et al ("eSBA SMF and PCF selection-option 2", 3GPP TSG-SA WG2 Meeting #134, S2-1908043, June 24-28, 2019, Sapporo, Japan (6 pages); cited on IDS dated 9/10/2024), hereafter, “Huawei.” As to claim 1, Huawei discloses a method performed by a network function (NF) consumer (Page 2, 5.34.3, “the AMF” reading on “a network function (NF) consumer”) the method comprising: transmitting to a service communication proxy (SCP) a request message for a service operation wherein the request message for the service operation-at least comprises an indication that the SCP shall return required NF profile information of at least one NF producer discovered by the SCP (Page 2, 5.34.3, particularly, “If delegated discovery is used, the AMF first sends the SMF selection parameters and service request message to SCP together with an indication that the SCP does not send the service request to the selected SMF, and an indication that the selected NF profile is required.” “selected SMF” reading on “at least one NF producer”); and receiving, from the SCP, the required NF profile information of the at least one NF producer (Page 2, 5.34.3, particularly, “The SCP selects the SMF based on the selection parameters and rejects the service request together with the selected SMF and its SMF profile. The AMF determines whether the selected SMF support the UE location. If yes, the AMF sends the request to the SMF via SCP.”) As to claims 10 and 19-22, they are rejected by a similar rationale by that set forth in claim 1’s rejection. As to claims 2 and 11, Huawei discloses the request message for the service operation further comprises: a first set of mandatory parameters and a second set of preferred parameters; and an indication of an action of the SCP performed when NF producer candidates, which are discovered by the SCP from a Network Repository Function, NRF, and which match the first set of mandatory parameters, do not match at least one of the second set of preferred parameters (Page 2, 5.34.3, particularly, “SMF selection parameter include DNN and the UE location information as preferred parameter”). As to claims 3 and 12, Huawei discloses the request message for the service operation further comprises: a preferred parameter indication of one or more preferred parameters in the second set, wherein the indication of the action of the SCP indicates the action of the SCP performed when the NF producer candidates do not match at least one of the one or more preferred parameters indicated by the preferred parameter indication (Page 2, 5.34.3, particularly, “SMF selection parameter include DNN and the UE location information as preferred parameter”). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-8 and 13-17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: US Pub. No. 2022/0038545 - The method involves receiving a service request message at a service communication proxy (SCP) and from a consumer network function (NF). A lookup is performed in a preferred NF location routing rules database at the SCP using a parameter extracted from the message by the SCP. The routing rule corresponding to the parameter is located in the rules database. A producer NF is selected to process the service request based on application of the routing rule. The message is routed to the producer NF. A list of NFs is obtained from NFs registered with the SCP or querying a network function repository function (NRF). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THOMAS J DAILEY whose telephone number is (571)270-1246. The examiner can normally be reached 9:30am-6:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Umar Cheema can be reached on 571-270-3037. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /THOMAS J DAILEY/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2458
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 10, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597054
METHOD AND SYSTEM OF FORWARDING CONTACT DATA
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12580953
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DETECTING ENCRYPTED FLOOD ATTACKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12556589
MEDIA RESOURCE OPTIMIZATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12556605
Live Migration Of Clusters In Containerized Environments
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12549399
PROGRESS STATUS AFTER INTERRUPTION OF ONLINE SERVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+14.6%)
3y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 859 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month