Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/847,143

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PARAMETERIZING MEDICAL PROCEDURES

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Sep 13, 2024
Priority
Mar 16, 2022 — provisional 63/320,538 +1 more
Examiner
MORALES, JON ERIC C
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Intuitive Surgical Operations Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
1079 granted / 1264 resolved
+25.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
1306
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.3%
-35.7% vs TC avg
§103
36.9%
-3.1% vs TC avg
§102
34.8%
-5.2% vs TC avg
§112
5.6%
-34.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1264 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 32, 34-52 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Jare et al. (US 20190090969), cited previously. Regarding claim 32, Jare discloses a robot-assisted medical system 10, 800 comprising: a manipulator arm 510 (Figs. 5A, section 0051). an operator console 16 (Fig. 5A, section 0050); a medical instrument 512 coupled to the manipulator arm 510 (Fig. 5B, section 0052); and a control system 24,56 in communication with the operator console 16 and the manipulator arm 510 (Figs. 1, 3-4, 8, section 0043), wherein the control system comprises: a processor 58 (Figs. 4, 8, section 0043, Computer processors located on the electronics cart 24); and a memory 830 comprising machine readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the control system to: receive a plurality of medical procedure records (Fig. 8, section 0064); identify a set of characteristic actions common among the plurality of medical procedure records 1404 (Section 0118, 0119, different surgical tasks e.g., camera targeting, dots and needles, energy dissection, match board, needle targeting, peg board, pick and place, ring and rail, ring walk, sealing, suture, sponge, thread the rings, and tubes); and determine at least one parameter for each characteristic action in the set of characteristic actions (sections 0072, 0073). Regarding claim 34, Jare discloses wherein each of the plurality of medical procedure records includes medical procedure information for a medical procedure performed on a unique patient (Section 0070). Regarding claim 35, Jare discloses wherein each of the plurality of medical procedure records includes medical procedure information for a medical procedure performed by a common medical practitioner (Section 0070, 0073). Regarding claim 36, Jare discloses wherein each of the plurality of medical procedure records includes medical procedure information for a medical procedure performed by a guide medical practitioner (Section 0136). Regarding claim 37, Jare discloses wherein the at least one parameter includes a measure of an interventional consequence (section 0108, position of an organ). Regarding claim 38, Jare discloses wherein the set of characteristic actions includes an action of the medical instrument coupled to the manipulator arm; the medical instrument common among the plurality of medical procedure records (section 0090). Regarding claim 39, Jare discloses wherein the action of the medical instrument is a rotational motion of a wrist joint of the medical instrument (Section 0090). Regarding claim 40, Jare discloses wherein the at least one parameter includes a measure of amount rotation of the wrist joint (Section 0097). Regarding claim 41, Jare discloses wherein the at least one parameter includes a duration of time to complete the rotational motion (section 0116). Regarding claim 42, Jare discloses wherein the action of the medical instrument is a clamping action of an end effector of the medical instrument (Section 0097-0098). Regarding claim 43, Jare discloses wherein the at least one parameter includes a measure of force applied by the clamping action of the end effector (section 0098). Regarding claim 44, Jare discloses wherein the at least one parameter includes a duration of time to complete the clamping action (section 0097-0098). Regarding claim 45, Jare discloses wherein the action of the medical instrument is delivery of energy by the medical instrument (section 0116). Regarding claim 46, Jare discloses wherein the at least one parameter includes a measure of energy applied by medical instrument (section 0116). Regarding claim 47, Jare discloses wherein the at least one parameter includes a duration of time for the delivery of energy by the medical instrument (Section 0116). Regarding claim 48, Jare discloses wherein the medical instrument is an imaging instrument, and the action of the medical instrument is a pose change of the imaging instrument (Section 0043, position and orient the endoscope). Regarding claim 49, Jare discloses wherein the set of characteristic actions includes an action of the manipulator arm, wherein the manipulator arm is common among the plurality of medical procedure records (Section 0116). Regarding claim 50, Jare discloses wherein the at least one parameter includes a measure of an amount motion of the manipulator arm or a pose of manipulator arm during an arm collision incident (section 0097). Regarding claim 51, Jare discloses wherein the set of characteristic actions includes an action at the operator console 16, 52 (Fig. 1), wherein the operator console is common among the plurality of medical procedure records (Section 0080). Regarding claim 52, Jare discloses wherein the at least one parameter includes a duration of head disengagement from the operator console or a measure of motion of an operator input device at the operator console (Section 0057, 0090). Regarding claim 53, Jare discloses the robot-assisted medical system of claim 32, wherein each characteristic action in the set of characteristic actions comprises an action of a system, device, or component of the robot-assisted medical system, the system, device, or component being common among the plurality of medical procedure records (Section 0118, 0119, different surgical tasks e.g., camera targeting, dots and needles, energy dissection, match board, needle targeting, peg board, pick and place, ring and rail, ring walk, sealing, suture, sponge, thread the rings, and tubes). Regarding claim 54, Jare discloses the robot-assisted medical system of claim 32, wherein the at least one parameter comprises a measured or recorded aspect of the characteristic action, the at least one parameter determined from one or more data records within the plurality of medical procedure records (Section 0118, 0119, different surgical tasks e.g., camera targeting, dots and needles, energy dissection, match board, needle targeting, peg board, pick and place, ring and rail, ring walk, sealing, suture, sponge, thread the rings, and tubes). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 7/27/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Examiner does find that Jare discloses identify a set of characteristic actions common among the plurality of medical procedure records 1404 (Section 0118, 0119, different surgical tasks e.g., camera targeting, dots and needles, energy dissection, match board, needle targeting, peg board, pick and place, ring and rail, ring walk, sealing, suture, sponge, thread the rings, and tubes). Since applicant stated in the arguments that creating a stitch is a characteristic action and a suture is a type of medical stitch. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JON ERIC C MORALES whose telephone number is (571)272-3107. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 830AM-530PM CST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David Hamaoui can be reached at 571-270-5625. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JON ERIC C MORALES/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3796 /J.C.M/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3796
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 13, 2024
Application Filed
May 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jun 30, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jun 30, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jul 27, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 04, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746009
Tissue Clamping System
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745974
MEDICAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12741138
Cortical Stimulator
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12733898
MEDICAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM
4y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12728254
BLOOD PUMP CONTROL USING MOTOR VOLTAGE MEASUREMENT
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+10.0%)
2y 7m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1264 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month