Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/852,706

Moisture Curable Adhesive Compositions

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 30, 2024
Priority
Mar 30, 2022 — provisional 63/325,340 +1 more
Examiner
MANGOHIG, THOMAS A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Kaneka Americas Holding Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
20%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 0m
Est. Remaining
44%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 20% of cases
20%
Career Allowance Rate
88 granted / 440 resolved
-40.0% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+24.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 0m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
489
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
65.2%
+25.2% vs TC avg
§102
8.1%
-31.9% vs TC avg
§112
22.5%
-17.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 440 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION This is an application based on application number 18/852,706 filed 30 September 2024, which is a national stage entry of PCT/US2023/016543 filed 28 March 2023, which claims priority to US Provisional Application No. 63/325,340 filed 30 June 2022. Claims 1-20 are pending. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election of Group I claims 1-12 and 17-20 in the reply filed on 28 July 2026 is acknowledged. Because applicant did not distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election has been treated as an election without traverse (MPEP § 818.01(a)). Claims 13-16 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 28 July 2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 1-12 and 17-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Li et al. (WIPO International Publication No. WO 2020/176861 A1) (Li) in view of Fukatsu et al. (US Patent No. 5,767,197) (Fukatsu). Regarding instant claims 1, 6, and 9-12: Li discloses a curable composition comprising: an organic polymer having reactive silicon groups (Claim 1); a chlorinated polyolefin (Claims 1 and 8); and adhesion promoters inclusive amino modified silyl polymers (paragraph [0064]) Li further discloses that the organic polymer comprises a group represented by the general formula: PNG media_image1.png 21 97 media_image1.png Greyscale wherein R3 represents a hydrogen atom, an alkyl group having 1 to 20 carbon atoms, an aryl group having 6 to 20 atoms, or an aralkyl group having 7 to 20 carbon atoms (Claim 6). This group is an isocyanate group (paragraph [0045]). Li does not explicitly disclose the components (C) and (D). However, Fukatsu discloses a moisture curable adhesive (Title). Fukatsu further discloses an organic polymer having hydrolyzable silyl groups and free isocyanate (NCO) that are further reacted with NCO-reactive silanes inclusive of N-aminoethylaminopropyltrimethoxysilane (i.e., the claimed component (D) of claims 1 and 11-12) and N-aminoethylaminopropylmethyldimethoxysilane (i.e., the claimed component (C) of claims 1 and 9-10) in order to introduce additional hydrolyzable silane groups (col. 6, line 54 to col. 7, line 37). Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, having the teachings of the prior art before him or her, to add the NCO-reactive silanes of Fukatsu to the composition of Li. The motivation for doing so would have been that said NCO-reactive silanes meet the amino modified silyl polymers desired by Li. Further, said NCO-reactive silanes are capable of reacting with the isocyanate groups present in the organic polymer of Li to introduce additional hydrolyzable silane groups. Therefore, it would have been obvious to combine Fukatsu with Li to obtain the invention as specified by the instant claims. Regarding instant claim 2: Li further discloses that the reactive silicon groups are represented by general formula (I) (Claim 1): PNG media_image2.png 202 629 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding instant claim 3: Li further discloses that the hydrolyzable group is inclusive of a halogen, an alkoxy group, an acyloxy group, a ketoximate group, an amino group, an amide group, an acid amide group, an aminooxy group, a mercapto group, and an isopropoxy group (paragraph [0032]). Regarding instant claim 4: Li further discloses that the alkoxy groups are inclusive of methoxy, ethoxy, propoxy, and isopropoxy groups (paragraph [0032]). Regarding instant claim 5: Li further discloses that the organic polymer comprises a main chain of polyoxypropylene (Claim 4). Regarding instant claims 7-8: Li further discloses that het composition comprises an additive inclusive of a filler, a dehydration agent, a plasticizer, a stabilizer, a catalyst, and combinations thereof (Claims 11-12). Regarding instant claim 17: Li further discloses a composition comprising a substrate and the curable composition (Claim 17). Regarding instant claims 18-19: Li further discloses that the substrate is selected from the group consisting of polyvinyl chloride (PVC), ethylene propylene diene rubber (EPDM), and thermoplastic polyolefin (TPO) (Claims 18-19). Regarding instant claim 20: Li further discloses that the substrate is a smooth-back substrate (Claim 19). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Thomas A Mangohig whose telephone number is (571)270-7664. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5 Eastern. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alicia Chevalier can be reached at (571)272-1490. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TAM/Examiner, Art Unit 1788 09/23/2026 /Alicia Chevalier/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1788
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 30, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747374
ADHESIVE COMPOSITION, ADHESIVE FILM PREPARED FROM THE SAME AND DISPLAY MEMBER INCLUDING THE SAME
4y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12716018
SURFACE PROTECTION FILM AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING ORGANIC LIGHT-EMITTING ELECTRONIC DEVICE
5y 1m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12698421
POLYISOBUTYLENE ADHESIVE COMPRISING POLYOLEFIN COPOLYMER ADDITIVE
6y 1m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12668675
SURFACE PROTECTIVE FILM, OPTICAL MEMBER COMPRISING THE SAME, AND DISPLAY APPARATUS COMPRISING THE SAME
4y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12617969
LAYERED PRODUCT
6y 0m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
20%
Grant Probability
44%
With Interview (+24.4%)
4y 0m (~2y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 440 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month