Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/853,280

A COUPLING ARRANGEMENT FOR A DETACHABLE GROUND DEPOSITION ACCESSORY

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 01, 2024
Examiner
CAMERON, ATTICUS A
Art Unit
3658
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Micropply Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
49 granted / 58 resolved
+32.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
58 currently pending
Career history
116
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
13.6%
-26.4% vs TC avg
§103
48.0%
+8.0% vs TC avg
§102
30.8%
-9.2% vs TC avg
§112
5.9%
-34.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 58 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Joint Inventors This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 11/07/2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). A certified copy of this document has been placed in the file wrapper. As such, the effective filing date of the instant application is considered 04/06/2022, coinciding with the filing date of the Great Britain application to which foreign priority was requested. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 5-9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Strien et al. (EP3263429B1, referred to as Strien). Regarding claim 1: Strien discloses: A coupling arrangement for a coupling a detachable deposition accessory to an autonomous mobile robot (AMR), the coupling arrangement comprising: a first portion, the first portion is configured to be removably coupled to the AMR, and ([0030] said first coupling element 12 may comprise a pintle hook element or any other element of a coupling system known to the person skilled in the art and arranged to detachably connect said coupling unit 4 to said towing unit 1.) is operable to be pivotable about the pitch axis only; a second portion, the second portion is fixedly attached to the AMR and is configured to retain the first portion and limit movement of the detachable deposition accessory in the yaw axis, when coupled to the AMR; and a support arm, wherein the support arm extends between the first and second portions. ([0036] Figure 7 shows a perspective view of a vehicle coupling assembly comprising the coupling unit of Figure 3 and the blocking assembly mounted on a towing unit as in Figure 5a. The coupling unit 4 is detachably connected to said blocking assembly 21, in particular via the first coupling element 12 cooperating with the coupling member 25 on the blocking assembly 21. Rotation around the first pivotal axis 13 is blocked by the rotation limiting means 20 engaging the rotation limiting engaging members 23. Therefore, an axle 24 of the towing unit 1 is substantially in parallel with said at least one axle 16 of the coupling unit 4 due to the blocking of the rotation of the coupling unit 4 with respect to the towing unit 1. The protruding bar 19 is shown in a non-extended position. A pitching movement of the coupling unit 4 with respect to the towing unit 1 is possible due to the elongated shape, both of the rotation limiting means 20 as of the rotation limiting engaging members 23, comprising a longitudinal axis substantially in parallel with said at least one axle 16 of said coupling unit 4 and/or with an axle 24 of the towing unit 1. This pitching movement may however be limited by the shape of the towing unit's chassis, which may include a groove or channel, in which the protruding bar 19 of the coupling unit 4 may be inserted, as shown in Figure 6.) Regarding claim 2: Strien discloses: A coupling arrangement as claimed in claim 1, Strien further discloses: wherein movement in the yaw axis is limited to less than a 5-degree angle between the first and second portions. ([0036] Figure 7 shows a perspective view of a vehicle coupling assembly comprising the coupling unit of Figure 3 and the blocking assembly mounted on a towing unit as in Figure 5a. The coupling unit 4 is detachably connected to said blocking assembly 21, in particular via the first coupling element 12 cooperating with the coupling member 25 on the blocking assembly 21. Rotation around the first pivotal axis 13 is blocked by the rotation limiting means 20 engaging the rotation limiting engaging members 23.) Regarding claim 3: Strien discloses: A coupling arrangement as claimed in claim 1, Strien further discloses: wherein either the first and/or second portions are comprised of metal plates. ([Fig. 4] metal plate 26 [0036] Figure 7 shows a perspective view of a vehicle coupling assembly comprising the coupling unit of Figure 3 and the blocking assembly mounted on a towing unit as in Figure 5a. The coupling unit 4 is detachably connected to said blocking assembly 21, in particular via the first coupling element 12 cooperating with the coupling member 25 on the blocking assembly 21. Rotation around the first pivotal axis 13 is blocked by the rotation limiting means 20 engaging the rotation limiting engaging members 23.) Regarding claim 5: Strien discloses: A coupling arrangement as claimed in claim 1, Strien further discloses: wherein the second portion further comprises a mechanical clamp arrangement, and wherein the mechanical clamp arrangement is configured to retain the first portion and limit movement of the autonomous deposition accessory in the yaw axis, when coupled to the detachable deposition accessory. ([0036] Figure 7 shows a perspective view of a vehicle coupling assembly comprising the coupling unit of Figure 3 and the blocking assembly mounted on a towing unit as in Figure 5a. The coupling unit 4 is detachably connected to said blocking assembly 21, in particular via the first coupling element 12 cooperating with the coupling member 25 on the blocking assembly 21. Rotation around the first pivotal axis 13 is blocked by the rotation limiting means 20 engaging the rotation limiting engaging members 23.) Regarding claim 6: Strien discloses: A coupling arrangement as claimed in claim 1, Strien further discloses: wherein the second portion further comprises a retaining seat, operable to retain the first portion in a planar alignment with the second portion. ([Fig. 6] rotation limiting engaging member 23 [0034] Said rotation limiting engaging member 23 may include a conventionally present element on a rear side of a towing unit 1, for example a bumper, or include a dedicated member. In the preferred embodiment of Figure 4, said rotation limiting engaging member 23 comprises at least two spaced apart rotation limiting engaging members 23, which may preferably be spaced apart in a direction substantially in parallel with an axle 24 (see Figure 7) of the towing unit 1, to which said blocking assembly 21 may be mounted, or in any other direction. Said at least one rotation limiting engaging member 23 advantageously has a substantially elongated shape comprising a longitudinal axis substantially in parallel with said at least one axle 16 of said coupling unit 4 and/or with an axle 24 of the towing unit 1, to which said blocking assembly 21 may be mounted. In particular, said at least one rotation limiting engaging member 23 can comprise a substantially concave recess arranged to receive and guide a cooperating substantially convex element of said rotation limiting means 20 on said coupling unit 4.) Regarding claim 7: Strien discloses: A coupling arrangement as claimed in claim 1, Strien further discloses: wherein the support arm maybe pivotable about a second single pivot axis, also limited in the yaw axis. ([0001] The invention relates to a coupling unit and blocking assembly of a vehicle coupling assembly for coupling a towing unit of a compound vehicle to a trailing unit of said compound vehicle. [0002] Such a coupling unit is commonly known, for example from US 5,407,221, disclosing a converter dolly for connecting tandem trailers or compound vehicles. The towing unit may be an integral truck cab assembly or may be connected to a powered tractor unit using for example a fifth wheel and kingpin arrangement commonly known in the art. The trailing unit may be conventionally attached to the towing unit using a converter dolly carrying for example another fifth wheel assembly. These arrangements can provide pivot points between the tractor unit and the first towing unit, between the first towing unit and the converter dolly, and between the trailing unit and the converter dolly. [0034] a coupling member 25 arranged to cooperate with said first coupling element 12 of said coupling unit 4 to detachably couple said coupling unit 4 to said towing unit 1. In this embodiment, the coupling member 25 includes a pintle hook arranged to engage the ring hitch element 18 of the coupling unit 4 of the embodiment shown in Figure 4. As will be clear to the person skilled in the art, any other suitable coupling member may be used. Said at least one rotation limiting engaging member 23 may preferably be mounted in alignment with said coupling member 25 in a direction in parallel with said at least one axle 16 of said coupling unit 4, but a different alignment, or even no alignment, is possible as well. Moreover, in case of at least two spaced apart rotation limiting engaging members 23, said of at least two rotation limiting engaging members 23 may be mounted on either side of said coupling member 25, again preferably in a direction in parallel with said at least one axle 16 of said coupling unit 4. It will be evident to the person skilled in the art that the mounting and spacing of said at least one rotation limiting engaging member 23 and said coupling member 25 will have to be adapted to the corresponding rotation limiting means 20 and the first coupling element 12 of the coupling unit 4.) Regarding claim 8: Strien discloses: A coupling arrangement as claimed in claim 1, Strien further discloses: wherein the support arm may be formed of metal. ([0001] The invention relates to a coupling unit and blocking assembly of a vehicle coupling assembly for coupling a towing unit of a compound vehicle to a trailing unit of said compound vehicle. [0002] Such a coupling unit is commonly known, for example from US 5,407,221, disclosing a converter dolly for connecting tandem trailers or compound vehicles. The towing unit may be an integral truck cab assembly or may be connected to a powered tractor unit using for example a fifth wheel and kingpin arrangement commonly known in the art. The trailing unit may be conventionally attached to the towing unit using a converter dolly carrying for example another fifth wheel assembly. These arrangements can provide pivot points between the tractor unit and the first towing unit, between the first towing unit and the converter dolly, and between the trailing unit and the converter dolly.) Regarding claim 9: Strien discloses: A coupling arrangement as claimed in claim 1, Strien further discloses: wherein either of the first or second portions further comprise movement stoppers, operable to limit the movement of the either of the first or second portions in the pitch axis. ([0034] a coupling member 25 arranged to cooperate with said first coupling element 12 of said coupling unit 4 to detachably couple said coupling unit 4 to said towing unit 1. In this embodiment, the coupling member 25 includes a pintle hook arranged to engage the ring hitch element 18 of the coupling unit 4 of the embodiment shown in Figure 4. As will be clear to the person skilled in the art, any other suitable coupling member may be used. Said at least one rotation limiting engaging member 23 may preferably be mounted in alignment with said coupling member 25 in a direction in parallel with said at least one axle 16 of said coupling unit 4, but a different alignment, or even no alignment, is possible as well. Moreover, in case of at least two spaced apart rotation limiting engaging members 23, said of at least two rotation limiting engaging members 23 may be mounted on either side of said coupling member 25, again preferably in a direction in parallel with said at least one axle 16 of said coupling unit 4. It will be evident to the person skilled in the art that the mounting and spacing of said at least one rotation limiting engaging member 23 and said coupling member 25 will have to be adapted to the corresponding rotation limiting means 20 and the first coupling element 12 of the coupling unit 4.) Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 10-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Strien (EP3263429B1, referred to as Strien) in view of Abels (EP2130698B1, referred to as Abels). Regarding claim 10: Strien discloses: A coupling arrangement according to claim 1, Strien does not explicitly disclose the following limitaitons, however Abels, from an analogous field of endeavor, further teaches: wherein the coupling further comprises a data connection, wherein the data connection is operable to send data between the detachable deposition accessory and the AMR. ([0177] The energization of a light of the motor vehicle 19, preferably a tail light, can also be a starting condition for starting the time interval for the active switching of a drive switch 100 and/or 100 b. For this purpose, the controller 69 preferably evaluates signals or current flows of tail lamps, for example a rear fog lamp 127 and/or a reversing headlight 128 and/or flashing lamps 129. The controller 69 is connected to power supply lines 130 of an on-board power supply system 131 of the motor vehicle 19 in order to check an energization of the lamps 127- 129. Because of the connection to power supply lines 130 for tail lamps, the line paths are short. If the operator of the motor vehicle 19 now engages a reverse gear, for example, the reversing headlights 128 are activated and the controller 69 consequently starts the time interval. This is preferably followed by a second triggering condition which the controller checks, for example "terminal 15 switched on", as a rule the second latching of the engine start switch 126.) Strien and Abels are analogous art to the claimed invention since they are from the similar field of coupling means in mobile robotics. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention, with a reasonable expectation for success, to modify the detachable deposition accessory disclosed in Strien to enable the data collection and transmission taught in Abels. The motivation for modification would have been to provide the deposition method taught in the combination of Strien and Shroeder with data collection to enhance performance over time as taught in Abels. Regarding claim 11: Strien discloses: A coupling arrangement according to claim 1, Strien does not explicitly disclose the following limitaitons, however Abels, from an analogous field of endeavor, further teaches: wherein the coupling further comprises a power connection, wherein the power connection is operable to send electrical power between the detachable deposition accessory and the autonomous deposition apparatus. ([0177] The energization of a light of the motor vehicle 19, preferably a tail light, can also be a starting condition for starting the time interval for the active switching of a drive switch 100 and/or 100 b. For this purpose, the controller 69 preferably evaluates signals or current flows of tail lamps, for example a rear fog lamp 127 and/or a reversing headlight 128 and/or flashing lamps 129. The controller 69 is connected to power supply lines 130 of an on-board power supply system 131 of the motor vehicle 19 in order to check an energization of the lamps 127- 129. Because of the connection to power supply lines 130 for tail lamps, the line paths are short. If the operator of the motor vehicle 19 now engages a reverse gear, for example, the reversing headlights 128 are activated and the controller 69 consequently starts the time interval. This is preferably followed by a second triggering condition which the controller checks, for example "terminal 15 switched on", as a rule the second latching of the engine start switch 126.) Strien and Abels are analogous art to the claimed invention since they are from the similar field of coupling means in mobile robotics. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention, with a reasonable expectation for success, to modify the detachable deposition accessory disclosed in Strien to enable the data collection and transmission taught in Abels. The motivation for modification would have been to provide the deposition method disclosed in Strien with power transmission as taught in Abels. Claims 12 and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Strien (EP3263429B1, referred to as Strien) in view of Shroeder (EP3505682A1, referred to as Shroeder). Regarding claim 12: Strien discloses: A detachable deposition accessory for coupling to an autonomous mobile robot (AMR), the detachable deposition accessory comprising: a locomotion arrangement; a deposition arrangement; at least one receptacle to hold a deposition material; a control unit, the control unit operable to receive at least one deposition instruction from the AMR; and the coupling arrangement according to claim 1. Strien does not explicitly disclose, however Shroeder, from an analogous field of endeavor, further teaches: Regarding claim 14: Strien discloses: A detachable deposition accessory according to claim 12, Strien further discloses: wherein the detachable deposition accessory further comprises a chassis with a nozzle array on a traverse guide. Claims 13, 15, 17, and 19- 23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Strien (EP3263429B1, referred to as Strien) in view of Shroeder (EP3505682A1, referred to as Shroeder) and further in view of McMurtry et al. (US20050055142, referred to as McMurtry). Regarding claim 13: The combination of Strien and Shroeder teaches: A detachable deposition accessory according to claim 12, The combination of Strien and Shroeder does not explicitly teach, however McMurtry, from an analogous field of endeavor, further teaches: wherein the control unit operable to send data from the detachable deposition accessory to the AMR. ([0035] The vehicle 4 has marking means for marking the ground as it travels around the sports field 2 under its own power and guided by guidance means provided by an outboard computer which is responsive to the data generated by the detecting means 3 and the encoder 7. In the embodiment of FIGS. 3 to 8, the dispensing device 5 is adapted to deliver a liquid marking material.) Strien, Shroeder, and McMurtry are analogous art to the claimed invention since they are from the similar field of coupling means in mobile robotics. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention, with a reasonable expectation for success, to modify the detachable deposition accessory taught in the combination of Strien and Shroeder to enable the data collection and transmission taught in McMurtry. The motivation for modification would have been to provide the deposition method taught in the combination of Strien and Shroeder with data collection to enhance performance over time as taught in McMurtry. Regarding claim 15: The combination of Strien and Shroeder teaches: the detachable deposition accessory according to claim 12. The combination of Strien and Shroeder does not teach the following limitations, however McMurtry further teaches: An autonomous mobile robot (AMR), the AMR comprising: a locomotion arrangement; a control unit, the control unit operable to receive at least one deposition instruction; and a coupling arrangement capable of attaching to the detachable deposition accessory ([0036] In the embodiment of FIG. 3 the dispensing device 5 comprises a single nozzle 13 mounted on an arm assembly 11, 12 and 14 attached to the chassis 10. The arm 12 is adjustable about a pivot 14 relative to the arm 11, which is fixed to the chassis 10, thus allowing different settings. The nozzle 13 is connected to a material metering device 15 by a plurality of tubes 16(one of which is shown in FIG. 3). Different colored materials are dispensed through each of the tubes 16. A color image can be produced by using the different colors in turn, or a single color can be used to produce a monochrome image. The metering means 15 receives input from the guidance means 3A so as to control the delivery of material, and its color, from the nozzle 13 in accordance with the position of the vehicle on the sports field.) Strien, Shroeder, and McMurtry are analogous art to the claimed invention since they are from the similar field of coupling means in mobile robotics. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention, with a reasonable expectation for success, to modify the detachable deposition accessory taught in the combination of Strien and Shroeder to enable the data collection and transmission of deposition data taught in McMurtry. The motivation for modification would have been to provide the deposition method taught in the combination of Strien and Shroeder with the specific use case of deposition and instructions described in McMurtry. Regarding claim 17: The combination of Strien, Shroeder, and McMurtry teaches: The method of claim 16, Strien further discloses: further comprising the step of coupling a data and/or power cable between the detachable deposition accessory and the AMR. ([0036] In the embodiment of FIG. 3 the dispensing device 5 comprises a single nozzle 13 mounted on an arm assembly 11, 12 and 14 attached to the chassis 10. The arm 12 is adjustable about a pivot 14 relative to the arm 11, which is fixed to the chassis 10, thus allowing different settings. The nozzle 13 is connected to a material metering device 15 by a plurality of tubes 16(one of which is shown in FIG. 3). Different colored materials are dispensed through each of the tubes 16. A color image can be produced by using the different colors in turn, or a single color can be used to produce a monochrome image. The metering means 15 receives input from the guidance means 3A so as to control the delivery of material, and its color, from the nozzle 13 in accordance with the position of the vehicle on the sports field.) Strien, Shroeder, and McMurtry are analogous art to the claimed invention since they are from the similar field of coupling means in mobile robotics. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention, with a reasonable expectation for success, to modify the detachable deposition accessory taught in the combination of Strien and Shroeder to enable the data collection and transmission of deposition data taught in McMurtry. The motivation for modification would have been to provide the deposition method taught in the combination of Strien and Shroeder with the specific use case of deposition and instructions described in McMurtry. Regarding claim 19: The combination of Strien, Shroeder, and McMurtry teaches: The method of claim 16, McMurtry further teaches: wherein the moving step further comprises using position sensors located on either of the detachable deposition accessory or the AMR. ([0036] In the embodiment of FIG. 3 the dispensing device 5 comprises a single nozzle 13 mounted on an arm assembly 11, 12 and 14 attached to the chassis 10. The arm 12 is adjustable about a pivot 14 relative to the arm 11, which is fixed to the chassis 10, thus allowing different settings. The nozzle 13 is connected to a material metering device 15 by a plurality of tubes 16(one of which is shown in FIG. 3). Different colored materials are dispensed through each of the tubes 16. A color image can be produced by using the different colors in turn, or a single color can be used to produce a monochrome image. The metering means 15 receives input from the guidance means 3A so as to control the delivery of material, and its color, from the nozzle 13 in accordance with the position of the vehicle on the sports field. [0063] The vehicle 4 may be able to calculate its position and heading within its working environment (FIG. 1) by utilizing the sensor 3 that may be a rotating infra-red emitter/detector. An infra-red signal will be emitted from said sensor 3 and reflected back to said sensor from a plurality of reflective targets 1 a-1 f in known positions on the periphery of the vehicles 4 working environment.) Strien, Shroeder, and McMurtry are analogous art to the claimed invention since they are from the similar field of coupling means in mobile robotics. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention, with a reasonable expectation for success, to modify the detachable deposition accessory taught in the combination of Strien and Shroeder to enable the data collection and transmission of deposition data taught in McMurtry. The motivation for modification would have been to provide the deposition method taught in the combination of Strien and Shroeder with the specific use case of deposition and instructions described in McMurtry. Regarding claim 20: The combination of Strien, Shroeder, and McMurtry teaches: A method of depositing a material using the AMR of claim 16, McMurtry further teaches: the method comprising: a. an operator coupling the detachable deposition accessory to an AMR; b. receiving at least one deposition instruction from a user; c. the AMR controlling the detachable deposition accessory to deposit material according to the deposition instructions. ([0036] In the embodiment of FIG. 3 the dispensing device 5 comprises a single nozzle 13 mounted on an arm assembly 11, 12 and 14 attached to the chassis 10. The arm 12 is adjustable about a pivot 14 relative to the arm 11, which is fixed to the chassis 10, thus allowing different settings. The nozzle 13 is connected to a material metering device 15 by a plurality of tubes 16(one of which is shown in FIG. 3). Different colored materials are dispensed through each of the tubes 16. A color image can be produced by using the different colors in turn, or a single color can be used to produce a monochrome image. The metering means 15 receives input from the guidance means 3A so as to control the delivery of material, and its color, from the nozzle 13 in accordance with the position of the vehicle on the sports field.) Strien, Shroeder, and McMurtry are analogous art to the claimed invention since they are from the similar field of coupling means in mobile robotics. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention, with a reasonable expectation for success, to modify the detachable deposition accessory taught in the combination of Strien and Shroeder to enable the data collection and transmission of deposition data taught in McMurtry. The motivation for modification would have been to provide the deposition method taught in the combination of Strien and Shroeder with the specific use case of deposition and instructions described in McMurtry. Regarding claim 21: The combination of Strien, Shroeder, and McMurtry teaches: A method as claimed in claim 20, McMurtry further teaches: wherein after it is coupled to the AMR, the detachable deposition accessory sends data to the AMR. ([0036] In the embodiment of FIG. 3 the dispensing device 5 comprises a single nozzle 13 mounted on an arm assembly 11, 12 and 14 attached to the chassis 10. The arm 12 is adjustable about a pivot 14 relative to the arm 11, which is fixed to the chassis 10, thus allowing different settings. The nozzle 13 is connected to a material metering device 15 by a plurality of tubes 16(one of which is shown in FIG. 3). Different colored materials are dispensed through each of the tubes 16. A color image can be produced by using the different colors in turn, or a single color can be used to produce a monochrome image. The metering means 15 receives input from the guidance means 3A so as to control the delivery of material, and its color, from the nozzle 13 in accordance with the position of the vehicle on the sports field.) Strien, Shroeder, and McMurtry are analogous art to the claimed invention since they are from the similar field of coupling means in mobile robotics. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention, with a reasonable expectation for success, to modify the detachable deposition accessory taught in the combination of Strien and Shroeder to enable the data collection and transmission of deposition data taught in McMurtry. The motivation for modification would have been to provide the deposition method taught in the combination of Strien and Shroeder with the specific use case of deposition and instructions described in McMurtry. Regarding claim 22: The combination of Strien, Shroeder, and McMurtry teaches: A method as claimed in claim 20, McMurtry further teaches: wherein the user sends deposition instructions to the AMR via a cloud server or device, or an edge server or device. ([0036] In the embodiment of FIG. 3 the dispensing device 5 comprises a single nozzle 13 mounted on an arm assembly 11, 12 and 14 attached to the chassis 10. The arm 12 is adjustable about a pivot 14 relative to the arm 11, which is fixed to the chassis 10, thus allowing different settings. The nozzle 13 is connected to a material metering device 15 by a plurality of tubes 16(one of which is shown in FIG. 3). Different colored materials are dispensed through each of the tubes 16. A color image can be produced by using the different colors in turn, or a single color can be used to produce a monochrome image. The metering means 15 receives input from the guidance means 3A so as to control the delivery of material, and its color, from the nozzle 13 in accordance with the position of the vehicle on the sports field.) Strien, Shroeder, and McMurtry are analogous art to the claimed invention since they are from the similar field of coupling means in mobile robotics. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention, with a reasonable expectation for success, to modify the detachable deposition accessory taught in the combination of Strien and Shroeder to enable the data collection and transmission of deposition data taught in McMurtry. The motivation for modification would have been to provide the deposition method taught in the combination of Strien and Shroeder with the specific use case of deposition and instructions described in McMurtry. Regarding claim 23: Strien discloses: An apparatus or method as claimed in claim 1, Strien does not explicitly disclose, however McMurtry further teaches: wherein the material for deposition is a herbicide, pesticide, insecticide, plant growth aid, water or marking material, optionally wherein the marking material is a paint, ink, coloured material, powder. ([0063] The vehicle 4 may then move itself into the correct position (X-Y co-ordinate) and heading on the surface to be painted and the or each nozzle may dispense the color corresponding to the pixilated image held in the vehicle memory. The color required for a pixel may be dispensed by any of the nozzles 13, 20 and 21 individually for a single color or any combination of the nozzles 13, 20 and 21 may be used together to generate any color required (i.e. the sprays mix together). When one line is complete the vehicle may move on to the next position corresponding to the next line of pixels by using the infra-red emitter/detector and encoder devices to ensure the position is correct, the next line of pixels may then be dispensed.)) Strien, Shroeder, and McMurtry are analogous art to the claimed invention since they are from the similar field of coupling means in mobile robotics. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention, with a reasonable expectation for success, to modify the detachable deposition accessory taught in the combination of Strien and Shroeder to enable the data collection and transmission of deposition data taught in McMurtry. The motivation for modification would have been to provide the deposition method taught in the combination of Strien and Shroeder with the specific use case of deposition and instructions described in McMurtry. Claim 4 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Strien (EP3263429B1, referred to as Strien) in view of Smith et al. (US11429099B2, referred to as Smith) Regarding claim 4: Strien discloses: A coupling arrangement as claimed in claim 3, Strien does not explicitly disclose, however Smith, from an analogous field of endeavor, further teaches: wherein the first and second portions are operable to be magnetised by an applied current. ([0202] an outer annular (or other shape) sleeve 892 comprises an electromagnetic coil (e.g.) a solenoid. This coil, when energized forces the magnetic sleeve 888 axially rearwardly (against the bias of the spring 887), and places the ball bearings 885 in alignment with an annular trough 893 within the front, inner surface of the magnetic sleeve 888. This trough allows the ball bearings 885 to pop radially outwardly from the holes 886 sufficiently to disengage them from the male fitting trough 882, thereby allowing axial movement of the male fitting relative to the female coupling. This unlocked state is shown in FIGS. 8C and 8D. [0203] In operation, an electrical current is delivered to the outer sleeve/solenoid 892 via a relay or other switch that receives a signal from (e.g. the AV yard truck controller). An onboard battery (not shown) of sufficient power can be included in the female coupling assembly. Alternatively, power can be supplied by the AV Yard truck's electrical system. The magnetic sleeve, thus, moves axially rearwardly as shown in FIG. 8C. This position allows the ball bearings 885 to move radially inwardly as the male fitting is moved axially inwardly relative to the inner sleeve 884 (shown in FIG. 8D). During this step, the outer sleeve/solenoid 892 remains energized by the switch and battery. Once fully engaged, the switch disconnects the battery and the spring 887 drives the magnetic sleeve forwardly (as it is now free of bias by the magnetic solenoid). The ball bearings 885, thus encounter the non-indented part of the magnetic sleeve's (884) inner surface and are driven radially outwardly into the male fitting's trough 882, thereby forming a sealed lock as shown in FIG. 8E.) Strien and Smith are analogous art to the claimed invention since they are from the similar field of coupling means in mobile robotics. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention, with a reasonable expectation for success, to modify the detachable deposition accessory taught in Strien to enable the electromagnetic locking mechanism taught in Smith. The motivation for modification would have been to provide the deposition method taught in Strien with the specific use case of electromagnetic locking as taught in Smith for the purpose of moving the lock from a locked to unlocked state via electrical charges. Claims 16 and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Strien (EP3263429B1, referred to as Strien) in view of Shroeder (EP3505682A1, referred to as Shroeder) and further in view of Smith et al. (US11429099B2, referred to as Smith). Regarding claim 16: The combination of Strien, Shroeder, and McMurtry teaches: A method of coupling a detachable deposition accessory to the autonomous mobile robot (AMR) of claim 15, The combination of Strien, Shroeder, and McMurtry do not explicitly teach the following limitations, however Smith, from an analogous field of endeavor, further teaches: the method comprising: moving the detachable deposition accessory and the AMR into close proximity; locating a first portion of the coupling arrangement attached to the detachable deposition accessory into a housing seat located on the AMR; and switching on the electromagnet system([0202]an outer annular (or other shape) sleeve 892 comprises an electromagnetic coil (e.g.) a solenoid. This coil, when energized forces the magnetic sleeve 888 axially rearwardly (against the bias of the spring 887), and places the ball bearings 885 in alignment with an annular trough 893 within the front, inner surface of the magnetic sleeve 888. This trough allows the ball bearings 885 to pop radially outwardly from the holes 886 sufficiently to disengage them from the male fitting trough 882, thereby allowing axial movement of the male fitting relative to the female coupling. This unlocked state is shown in FIGS. 8C and 8D. [0203] In operation, an electrical current is delivered to the outer sleeve/solenoid 892 via a relay or other switch that receives a signal from (e.g. the AV yard truck controller). An onboard battery (not shown) of sufficient power can be included in the female coupling assembly. Alternatively, power can be supplied by the AV Yard truck's electrical system. The magnetic sleeve, thus, moves axially rearwardly as shown in FIG. 8C. This position allows the ball bearings 885 to move radially inwardly as the male fitting is moved axially inwardly relative to the inner sleeve 884 (shown in FIG. 8D). During this step, the outer sleeve/solenoid 892 remains energized by the switch and battery. Once fully engaged, the switch disconnects the battery and the spring 887 drives the magnetic sleeve forwardly (as it is now free of bias by the magnetic solenoid). The ball bearings 885, thus encounter the non-indented part of the magnetic sleeve's (884) inner surface and are driven radially outwardly into the male fitting's trough 882, thereby forming a sealed lock as shown in FIG. 8E.) Strien, Shroeder, McMurtry, and Smith are analogous art to the claimed invention since they are from the similar field of coupling means in mobile robotics. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention, with a reasonable expectation for success, to modify the detachable deposition accessory taught in the combination of Strien, Shroeder, and McMurtry to enable the electromagnetic locking mechanism taught in Smith. The motivation for modification would have been to provide the deposition method taught in the combination of Strien, Shroeder, and McMurtry with the specific use case of electromagnetic locking as taught in Smith for the purpose of moving the lock from a locked to unlocked state via electrical charges. Regarding claim 18: The combination of Strien, Shroeder, McMurtry, and Smith teaches: The method of claim 16, Smith further teaches: further comprising the step of attaching a break chain between the detachable deposition accessory and the AMR. ([0202]an outer annular (or other shape) sleeve 892 comprises an electromagnetic coil (e.g.) a solenoid. This coil, when energized forces the magnetic sleeve 888 axially rearwardly (against the bias of the spring 887), and places the ball bearings 885 in alignment with an annular trough 893 within the front, inner surface of the magnetic sleeve 888. This trough allows the ball bearings 885 to pop radially outwardly from the holes 886 sufficiently to disengage them from the male fitting trough 882, thereby allowing axial movement of the male fitting relative to the female coupling. This unlocked state is shown in FIGS. 8C and 8D. [0203] In operation, an electrical current is delivered to the outer sleeve/solenoid 892 via a relay or other switch that receives a signal from (e.g. the AV yard truck controller). An onboard battery (not shown) of sufficient power can be included in the female coupling assembly. Alternatively, power can be supplied by the AV Yard truck's electrical system. The magnetic sleeve, thus, moves axially rearwardly as shown in FIG. 8C. This position allows the ball bearings 885 to move radially inwardly as the male fitting is moved axially inwardly relative to the inner sleeve 884 (shown in FIG. 8D). During this step, the outer sleeve/solenoid 892 remains energized by the switch and battery. Once fully engaged, the switch disconnects the battery and the spring 887 drives the magnetic sleeve forwardly (as it is now free of bias by the magnetic solenoid). The ball bearings 885, thus encounter the non-indented part of the magnetic sleeve's (884) inner surface and are driven radially outwardly into the male fitting's trough 882, thereby forming a sealed lock as shown in FIG. 8E.) Strien, Shroeder, McMurtry, and Smith are analogous art to the claimed invention since they are from the similar field of coupling means in mobile robotics. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention, with a reasonable expectation for success, to modify the detachable deposition accessory taught in the combination of Strien, Shroeder, and McMurtry to enable the electromagnetic locking mechanism taught in Smith. The motivation for modification would have been to provide the deposition method taught in the combination of Strien, Shroeder, and McMurtry with the specific use case of electromagnetic locking as taught in Smith for the purpose of moving the lock from a locked to unlocked state via electrical charges. Conclusion The prior art made of record, and not relied upon, considered pertinent to applicant' s disclosure or directed to the state of art is listed on the enclosed PTO-892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ATTICUS A CAMERON whose telephone number is 703-756-4535. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30 am - 4:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thomas Worden can be reached on 571-272-4876. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ATTICUS A CAMERON/ /JASON HOLLOWAY/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3658 Examiner, Art Unit 3658A
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 01, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12583445
VEHICLE CONTROLLER, METHOD, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR VEHICLE CONTROL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12586473
SYSTEM AND METHOD TO BUILD A FLYABLE HOLDING PATTERN ENTRY TRAJECTORY WHEN THE AVAILABLE SPACE IS LIMITED
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12544937
ROBOTIC HAND SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING ROBOTIC HAND
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12528448
HYBRID ELECTRIC VEHICLE ENERGY MANAGEMENT DURING EXTREME OPERATING CONDITIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Patent 12521883
SAFETY SYSTEM FOR INTEGRATED HUMAN/ROBOTIC ENVIRONMENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+11.4%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 58 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month