Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
3 pending office actions • 1 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Micropply Limited currently maintains 3 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are distributed across 3 distinct examiners, which indicates that every pending matter is being reviewed by a different individual. Despite this examiner diversity, the portfolio is concentrated within 1 distinct art unit, showing that all 3 pending office actions are being processed by the same technical division.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is MCGOWAN, JAMIE LOUISE, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This 1 action is one of the 3 pending office actions total for the company. Because the company is dealing with 3 distinct examiners but only 1 distinct art unit, the prosecution strategy must balance the different styles of the examiners while adhering to the standards of a single unit. Resolving the 3 pending office actions will require addressing the specific feedback from each of the 3 distinct examiners.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (33%) |
| Double-patenting + other | 1 (33%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (33%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MACIOROWSKI, GODFREY ALEKSANDER | 1 | 60.2% | +10.8% |
| LUK, EMMANUEL S | 1 | 71.5% | +26.3% |
| MCGOWAN, JAMIE LOUISE | 1 | 73.5% | +16.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18853190 | GROUND DEPOSITION MACHINE TANK MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | MACIOROWSKI, GODFREY ALEKSANDER | — |
| 18853246 | A DETACHABLE GROUND DEPOSITION ACCESSORY | MCGOWAN, JAMIE LOUISE | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18853190 | GROUND DEPOSITION MACHINE TANK MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | MACIOROWSKI, GODFREY ALEKSANDER | — |
| 18853183 | AUTONOMOUS GROUND DEPOSITION MACHINE WITH MULTIPLE ACCESSORY MEANS | LUK, EMMANUEL S | — |
| 18853246 | A DETACHABLE GROUND DEPOSITION ACCESSORY | MCGOWAN, JAMIE LOUISE | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3656 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18853190 | GROUND DEPOSITION MACHINE TANK MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | MACIOROWSKI, GODFREY ALEKSANDER | 3656 | §101§102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 01, 2024 |
| 18853183 | AUTONOMOUS GROUND DEPOSITION MACHINE WITH MULTIPLE ACCESSORY MEANS | LUK, EMMANUEL S | — | §102§103§112DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 01, 2024 |
| 18853246 | A DETACHABLE GROUND DEPOSITION ACCESSORY | MCGOWAN, JAMIE LOUISE | — | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 01, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial