Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/854,232

SEED SPIKE AND PLANTER USING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 04, 2024
Priority
Apr 05, 2022 — provisional 63/327,601 +3 more
Examiner
BUCK, MATTHEW R
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Reenvision AG Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
1520 granted / 1826 resolved
+23.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
47 currently pending
Career history
1859
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
67.1%
+27.1% vs TC avg
§102
8.3%
-31.7% vs TC avg
§112
21.1%
-18.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1826 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections The numbering of claims is not in accordance with 37 CFR 1.126 which requires the original numbering of the claims to be preserved throughout the prosecution. Misnumbered claims 9 (first occurrence), 9 (second occurrence) and 10 have been renumbered claims 9-11. Claims 9-11 are objected to because of the following informalities: (claim 9, line 1) “Th seed spike of claim 8” should be changed to “The seed spike assembly of claim 8”. (claim 10, line 10) “the soils” should be changed to “the soil”. (claim 11, line 1) “The method of claim 9” should be changed to “The method of claim 10”. (claim 11, line 2) “it” should be changed to “the seed”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Buchner et al. (US 2019/0230845). As concerns claim 1, Buchner shows a seed spike assembly (52) comprising: a seed spike (60) having a first channel (78) and a second channel (64) in communication with one another (Fig. 5 & 7); a funnel (54) configured to provide seed to the first channel (paragraph 0052 & 0059); a slider (62) in the second channel (Fig. 5); a crank wheel (68); and a connecting rod (70) connecting the crank wheel to the slider (Fig. 5), wherein as the slider is moved the first channel is one of blocked by the slider (Fig. 5 & 7 [position 2]) and exposed by the slider (Fig. 7 [position 3 & 4]). As concerns claim 2, Buchner shows wherein the slider is configured to protrude outside of the seed spike (Fig. 7 [position 7]). As concerns claim 3, Buchner shows wherein the seed spike includes a back side (Fig. 5: lower left side of body 60) and a front side (Fig. 5: lower right side of body 60) which join to form a substantially pointed end (Fig. 5). As concerns claim 4, Buchner shows wherein the seed spike includes a back side (Fig. 5: lower left side of body 60) which is inclined and a front side (Fig. 5: lower right side of body 60) which join together to form a substantially pointed end (Fig. 5). As concerns claim 5, Buchner shows wherein the seed spike includes a back side (Fig. 5: lower left side of body 60) which is inclined and a substantially vertical front side (Fig. 5: lower right side of body 60) which join together to form a substantially pointed end (Fig. 5). As concerns claim 6, Buchner shows wherein the back side is inclined from the horizontal at least 45 degrees (Fig. 5). As concerns claim 7, Buchner shows wherein an end (62a) of the slider is pointed (Fig. 5). As concerns claim 8, Buchner shows a seed spike assembly (52) comprising: a body (60) having an inclined back side (Fig. 5: lower left side of body 60) and a front side (Fig. 5: lower right side of body 60) that connect to form a substantially pointed end (Fig. 5), the body including a first channel (78) configured to receive an agricultural seed (90) and a second channel (64) that intersects the first channel and receives the seed from the first channel (Fig. 5 & 7), the second channel having an opening (paragraph 0054) through which the seed may exit the body (Fig. 5 & 7); and a slider (62) in the second channel (Fig. 5), the slider having a pointed end (62a) and configured to slide into a first position to block a seed from entering the second channel from the first channel (Fig. 7 [position 2]), a second position to allow the seed the enter the second channel (Fig. 7 [position 3 & 4]), and a third position where the slider extends out of the second channel near the pointed end (Fig. 7 [position 7]). As concerns claim 9, Buchner shows wherein the inclined back side is inclined at least 45 degrees from the horizontal when the front side is vertical (Fig. 5). As concerns claim 10, Buchner shows a method of planting a seed (90) comprising: pushing a seed spike assembly (52) into the ground (Fig. 7), the seed spike assembly having a body (60) with an inclined back side (Fig. 5: lower left side of body 60) and a front side (Fig. 5: lower right side of body 60) that connects to the inclined back side to form a substantially pointed end (Fig. 5), the body including a first channel (78) with a seed (90) and a second channel (64) that intersects the first channel, the seed spike assembly further including a slider (62) in the second channel in a position which blocks soil from entering the second channel and blocks the seed from entering the second channel (Fig. 7 [position 2]); moving the slider in the second channel to allow the seed to enter the second channel and drop into the soil (Fig. 7 [position 3-6 & 1]); and moving the slider in the second channel to push the seed into the soil to create seed soil contact and clear out any debris in the second channel (Fig. 7 [position 7]). As concerns claim 11, Buchner shows wherein the slider has an inclined surface to move the seed in a sideways and downward direction as the seed is pressed into the soil by the slider (paragraph 0071). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Anderson et al. (US 1,477,097) shows a seed spike assembly comprising: a seed spike having a first channel and a second channel in communication with one another; a funnel configured to provide seed to the first channel; a slider in the second channel; a crank wheel; and a connecting means connecting the crank wheel to the slider, wherein as the slider is moved the first channel is one of blocked by the slider and exposed by the slider (Fig. 7, 8 & 11). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MATTHEW R BUCK whose telephone number is (571)270-3653. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 6:30-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nicole Coy can be reached at (571)272-5405. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MATTHEW R BUCK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3672
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 04, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12677729
PLANTING DISC FOR A DISC PLANTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680966
METHOD FOR NON-CONTACT GROUND MOISTURE LEVEL ESTIMATION AT VARIOUS DEPTHS USING REFLECTED ENERGY AT A WORK MACHINE
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680416
DOWNHOLE TOOL AND METHOD OF USE
1y 12m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12672593
AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT HITCHES WITH ROTATIONAL MOTION
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12672599
MOUNTING ASSEMBLY FOR A HOPPER OF AN AGRICULTURAL ROW UNIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+14.5%)
2y 0m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1826 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month