Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/857,303

TOUCH SENSOR, DISPLAY DEVICE, MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR TOUCH SENSOR, AND MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 16, 2024
Examiner
BUTCHER, BRIAN M
Art Unit
2627
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Sharp Display Technology Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allow Rate
644 granted / 832 resolved
+15.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
858
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
§103
36.4%
-3.6% vs TC avg
§102
34.8%
-5.2% vs TC avg
§112
18.0%
-22.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 832 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 11 – 14 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on January 12, 2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 3 – 4, 6 – 7, 9 - 10, and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Ye (United States Patent US 11,005,068 B1), hereinafter referenced as Ye. Regarding Claim 1, Ye discloses “A touch sensor” (Figure 2, Column 5, Lines 38 – 40, Column 6, Lines 22 – 26 (Notice that a display with touch electrodes forming a touch sensor is shown in Figure 2.)), “comprising: a first insulating layer” (Figure 2, Item 41 ‘insulating layer’, and Column 8, Line 5), “a first wiring line located above the first insulating layer” (Figure 2, Item 42 ‘metal bridge layer’, and Column 6, Lines 11 – 12.)), “a second insulating layer located above the first wiring line” (Figure 2, Item 43 ‘second inorganic insulating layer’, and Column 8, Line 4.)), “and a second wiring line located above the second insulating layer” (Figure 2, Item 441 ‘first electrode’, and Column 7, Line 35), “wherein: an opening extending through the first insulating layer and the second insulating layer is formed” (Figure 2 and Column 8, Lines 1 – 8 (Notice that the recess or opening 431 extends through the first insulating layer 41 and second insulating layer 43.)), “the first insulating layer includes a first edge corresponding to an edge of the opening” (Figure 2 (Notice that the first insulating layer 41 includes a first edge at the recess or opening 431 that corresponds to 431.)), “the second insulating layer includes a second edge corresponding to the edge of the opening” (Figure 2 (Notice that second insulating layer 43 includes a second edge at the recess or opening 431 that corresponds to 431.)), “and a film thickness of the first edge is thinner than a film thickness of a portion other than the first edge in the first insulating layer” (Figure 2 (Notice that the curvature at the recess or opening 431 results in a film thickness at the first edge being thinner than a thickness of portions to the left and right of the first edge of first insulating layer 41.)), “or a film thickness of the second edge is thinner than a film thickness of a portion other than the second edge in the second insulating layer” (Figure 2 (Notice that the curvature at the recess or opening 431 results in a film thickness at the second edge being thinner than a thickness of portions to the left and right of the second edge of second insulating layer 43.)). Regarding Claim 3, Ye discloses everything claimed as applied above (See Claim 1). In addition, Ye discloses “wherein the second wiring line is part of net-like wiring line” (Figure 2, Column 6, Lines 22 – 26, and Column 7, Lines 25 – 27 (Notice that second wiring part 441 is part of a mesh or net-like wiring of metal mesh layer 44.)). Regarding Claim 4, Ye discloses everything claimed as applied above (See Claim 3). In addition, Ye discloses “wherein the opening is located in a mesh of the net-like wiring line in a plan view and functions as a light extraction portion” (Figure 2, Column 6, Lines 22 – 26, and Column 7, Lines 25 – 27 (Notice that recess or opening 431 is located in the recurring openings in the metal mesh layer 44 and function to extract light from pixel regions 202 underneath.)) Regarding Claim 6, Ye discloses everything claimed as applied above (See Claim 1). In addition, Ye discloses “wherein each of the first insulating layer and the second insulating layer is an inorganic insulating layer” (Column 8, Lines 3 – 5 (Notice that each of layer 41 and 43 are disclosed as being inorganic.)). Regarding Claim 7, Ye discloses everything claimed as applied above (See Claim 1). In addition, Ye discloses “wherein a contact hole connecting the first wiring line and the second wiring line is formed in the second insulating layer” (Figure 2 and Column 7, Lines 37 – 43 (Notice that at least a contact hole 432 is provided in second insulating layer 43 to connect first wiring line 42(421) and second wiring line 441.)). Regarding Claim 9, Ye discloses everything claimed as applied above (See Claim 1). In addition, Ye discloses “A display device comprising the touch sensor according to Claim 1” (Figure 2 and Column 5, Lines 38 – 40 (Notice that a display device is shown in Figure 2 that comprises the touch sensor according to the limitations of Claim 1 as argued above in the rejection of Claim 1.)). Regarding Claim 10, Ye discloses everything claimed as applied above (See Claim 9). In addition, Ye discloses “further comprising: a light-emitting element layer” (Figure 2, Item 20 ‘OLED luminous layer’, and Column 6, Lines 56 – 61), “and a sealing layer located above the light-emitting element layer” (Figure 2, Item 30 ‘encapsulation layer’, and Column 7, Lines 4 – 7), “wherein the first insulating layer is formed on the sealing layer” (Figure 2 (Notice that first insulating layer 41 is formed on first insulating/encapsulation layer 30.)). Regarding Claim 15, Ye discloses “A display device” (Figure 2 and Column 5, Lines 38 – 40), “comprising a touch sensor” (Figure 2, Column 5, Lines 38 – 40, Column 6, Lines 22 – 26 (Notice that the display with touch electrodes forming a touch sensor is shown in Figure 2.)), “a light-emitting element layer” (Figure 2, Item 20 ‘OLED luminous layer’, and Column 6, Lines 56 – 61), “and a sealing layer located above the light-emitting element layer” (Figure 2, Item 30 ‘encapsulation layer’, and Column 7, Lines 4 – 7), “wherein; the touch sensor comprises a first insulating layer” (Figure 2, Item 41 ‘insulating layer’, and Column 8, Line 5), “a first wiring line located above the first insulating layer” (Figure 2, Item 42 ‘metal bridge layer’, and Column 6, Lines 11 – 12.)), “a second insulating layer located above the first wiring line” (Figure 2, Item 43 ‘second inorganic insulating layer’, and Column 8, Line 4.)), “the first insulating layer is formed on the sealing layer” (Figure 2 (Notice that first insulating layer 41 is formed on first insulating/encapsulation layer 30.)), “an opening extending through the first insulating layer and the second insulating layer is formed” (Figure 2 and Column 8, Lines 1 – 8 (Notice that the recess or opening 431 extends through the first insulating layer 41 and second insulating layer 43.)), “the first insulating layer includes a first edge corresponding to an edge of the opening” (Figure 2 (Notice that the first insulating layer 41 includes a first edge at the recess or opening 431 that corresponds to 431.)), “the second insulating layer includes a second edge corresponding to the edge of the opening” (Figure 2 (Notice that second insulating layer 43 includes a second edge at the recess or opening 431 that corresponds to 431.)), “and a film thickness of the first edge is thinner than a film thickness of a portion other than the first edge in the first insulating layer” (Figure 2 (Notice that the curvature at the recess or opening 431 results in a film thickness at the first edge being thinner than a thickness of portions to the left and right of the first edge of first insulating layer 41.)), “or a film thickness of the second edge is thinner than a film thickness of a portion other than the second edge in the second insulating layer” (Figure 2 (Notice that the curvature at the recess or opening 431 results in a film thickness at the second edge being thinner than a thickness of portions to the left and right of the second edge of second insulating layer 43.)). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5 and 8 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. In the prior art of record, it has been shown to provide for the limitations of Claim 1 from which Claims 5 and 8 are dependent. However, it has not been shown in the prior art of record to provide for the opening of Ye extending though an additional insulation layer. Therefore, it has not been shown in the prior art of record to provide for the limitations of Claims 5 and 8 in combination with those of Claim 1 through each claims respective chain of dependency. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRIAN M BUTCHER whose telephone number is (571)270-5575. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday – Friday from 6:30 AM to 3:00 PM. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Ke Xiao, can be reached at (571) 272 - 7776. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /BRIAN M BUTCHER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2627 February 20, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 16, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604639
Display Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596440
GESTURE-CONTROLLED VIRTUAL REALITY SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF CONTROLLING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592179
DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY APPARATUS INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592199
DRIVING CIRCUIT, DRIVING METHOD, PIXEL CIRCUIT, DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12591326
Touch Sensor Integration with Enlarged Active Area Displays
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+14.0%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 832 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month