Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/857,455

DATA SET GENERATION METHOD, ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD ANALYSIS METHOD AND A NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Oct 17, 2024
Priority
May 30, 2022 — JP 2022-087939 +1 more
Examiner
RAJAPUTRA, SURESH KS
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
JFE Steel Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
397 granted / 473 resolved
+23.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
499
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
76.5%
+36.5% vs TC avg
§102
14.4%
-25.6% vs TC avg
§112
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 473 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Detailed Action 2. This office action is in response to the filing with the office dated 06/04/2025. Information Disclosure Statement 3. The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 10/17/2024 and 10/23/2025 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements are being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 U.S.C. 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. 4. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites “the major axis being inclined at a first angle relative to a rolling direction of the analysis target”. However it is not clear what is meant by “a first angle relative to a rolling direction of the analysis target”, since the metes and bounds of this very generic and broad claim recitation are not clear. Instant specification [0023] discloses “analysis of two-dimensional magnetic properties of an analysis target, such as a grain-oriented electrical steel sheet or non-oriented electrical steel sheet”. Therefore the claim should be amended to recite the same to avoid confusion about what “a rolling direction of the analysis target refers to” and clarify “a rolling direction of a grain-oriented electrical steel sheet or non-oriented electrical steel sheet”, commensurate with the disclosure in the specification. Appropriate correction to the claim language is required to bring clarity to the claim recitation. Claim 1 recites “…….elliptical magnetization applied….”. However in practice, elliptical magnetization is not applied, but rather a rotating magnetic field is applied or a target object is subjected to a rotating magnetic field which results in an elliptical magnetization being produced/realized in the target object, and in general magnetic field is applied and magnetization is produced in the target object. Appropriate correction to the claim language is required to bring clarity to the claim recitation. 5. Claims 2-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112 (b) due to their dependency. Allowable Subject Matter 6. Claims 1-13 are allowable subject to overcoming the 35 USC 112 rejections cited above. In related art Inoue et al (US 2020/0373046 A1) teaches, A grain-oriented electrical steel sheet for a stacked transformer core. The steel sheet having a sheet thickness t, where t and an iron loss deterioration ratio obtained by subjecting the steel sheet under elliptic magnetization satisfy the following relations: (i) when t 0.20 mm, the iron loss deterioration ratio is 85% or less; (ii) when 0.20 mm<t<0.27 mm, the iron loss deterioration ratio is 80% or less; and (iii) when 0.27 mm≤t, the iron loss deterioration ratio is 75% or less. The iron loss deterioration ratio is calculated from ((W.sub.A−W.sub.B)/W.sub.B)×100, where W.sub.A is iron loss under 50 Hz elliptic magnetization of 1.7 T in a rolling direction and 1.0 T in a direction orthogonal to the rolling direction, and W.sub.B is iron loss under 50 Hz alternating magnetization of 1.7 T in the rolling direction. Masuda et al (US 2022/0051840 A1 ) teaches, An iron core (1, 11, 31) for a stationary induction apparatus according to one embodiment is configured by laminating a plurality of electromagnetic steel plates (5, 16, 33). The electromagnetic steel plates are laminated so that joint parts (6, 17, 18, 32), at which the end portions of the electromagnetic steel plates abut one another, are disposed in a staggered manner; and the electromagnetic steel plates are provided with a magnetic domain fine differentiation processed part (7, 19, 34), which is located on the portion, of a surface of the end portion of each of the electromagnetic steel plates, lapped with the joint part of another electromagnetic steel plate, and which has been subjected to warping-derived magnetic domain fine differentiation. Omura et al (US 2018/0119244 A1 ) teaches, Provided is a grain-oriented electrical steel sheet having an excellent noise property in an actual transformer. Magnetostrictive properties of the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet are set such that the number of acceleration/deceleration points that are present in the magnetostriction velocity level dλ/dt in one period of magnetostrictive vibration is 4 and the magnitude of velocity level change between adjacent velocity change points in an acceleration zone or deceleration zone of magnetostrictive vibration is 3.0×10.sup.−4 sec.sup.−1 or less. Cited prior art neither individually nor in combination, fails to teach, anticipate or render obvious, “A data set generation method of acquiring two-dimensional magnetic properties for use in analyzing an electromagnetic field of an analysis target by taking magnetic field strength and magnetic flux density as vector quantities, the data set generation method comprising: measuring a first magnetic field strength vector generated in the analysis target in response to first elliptical magnetization applied clockwise along an ellipse having a major axis and a minor axis with a predetermined axis ratio, the major axis being inclined at a first angle relative to a rolling direction of the analysis target; measuring a second magnetic field strength vector generated in the analysis target in response to second elliptical magnetization applied counterclockwise along an ellipse having a major axis and a minor axis with the predetermined axis ratio, the major axis being inclined at a second angle relative to the rolling direction of the analysis target, the second angle being opposite in sign from the first angle; calculating a first average magnetic field strength vector by averaging the first magnetic field strength vector and the second magnetic field strength vector; calculating a first average magnetic flux density vector by averaging a first magnetic flux density vector corresponding to the first elliptical magnetization and a second magnetic flux density vector corresponding to the second elliptical magnetization; and generating a data set of the two-dimensional magnetic properties that associates the first average magnetic field strength vector and the first average magnetic flux density vector with the predetermined axis ratio and the first angle” (as recited in the independent claim 1). Claims 2-13 are allowed due to their dependency on claim 1. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SURESH RAJAPUTRA whose telephone number is (571) 270-0477. The examiner can normally be reached between 8:00 AM - 5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, EMAN ALKAFAWI can be reached on 571-272-4448. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SURESH K RAJAPUTRA/Examiner, Art Unit 2858 /EMAN A ALKAFAWI/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2858 6/17/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 17, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12669454
DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR TESTING SAMPLES IN TEMPORALLY MODULATED MAGNETIC FIELDS
2y 0m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12663437
TEST SOCKET
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12656282
Magnetic Resonance Apparatus for Detecting at Least One Property of a Sample
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12650463
BREAKOUT CONNECTOR PLATFORM FOR INTERPOSER MODULES THAT IMPLEMENT DENSELY PITCHED INTEGRATED CIRCUITS ON CONVENTIONAL MOTHERBOARDS
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12644688
POSITION SENSING SYSTEM, METHOD FOR ACQUIRING POSITION SENSING SIGNAL, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+12.5%)
2y 4m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 473 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month