Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/861,586

RESIN COMPOSITION FOR MOLDING AND ELECTRONIC COMPONENT DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 30, 2024
Priority
Jun 10, 2022 — JP 2022-094677 +1 more
Examiner
SMITH, GRAHAM P
Art Unit
2845
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Resonac Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
531 granted / 695 resolved
+8.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
712
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
81.4%
+41.4% vs TC avg
§102
4.5%
-35.5% vs TC avg
§112
11.1%
-28.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 695 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 2023/0092703 (“Yamaura” or “Y”). 1: Y teaches a resin composition for molding (abstract), containing: an epoxy resin (abstract); a curing agent (abstract) containing an active ester compound and a phenol curing agent (0047); and an inorganic filler (abstract) containing calcium titanate particles (abstract). 2: Y teaches that a content ratio of the calcium titanate particles is 30 volume% to 60 volume% with respect to an inorganic filler as a whole (abstract). 3: Y teaches a stress relaxing agent (0118). 4: Y fails to teach that the stress relaxing agent contains at least one of indene-styrene-coumarone copolymer, trialkylphosphine oxide, and triarylphosphine oxide. However, it was old and well-known to employ the listed as stress relaxing agents. Thus, it would have been obvious to employ any of the listed as Y’s stress relaxing agent. To do so would have been nothing more than the simple substitution of one know stress relaxer for another with predictable results. 5: Y teaches that the phenol curing agent contains aralkyl-type phenol resin (0067) and melamine-modified phenol resin (0067). 6: Y teaches that a content ratio of an inorganic filler as a whole exceeds 55 volume% with respect to a resin composition for molding as a whole (0014). 7: Y teaches that the resin composition for molding according to claim 1 is used for a high frequency device (0003). 8: Y teaches that the resin composition for molding according to claim 7 is used for sealing an electronic component in a high frequency device (0003). 9: Y teaches that the resin composition for molding according to claim 7 is used for an antenna-in-package (0010). 10: Y teaches an electronic component device, comprising: a support member; an electronic component, configured on the support member; and a cured product of a resin composition for molding according to 1, which seals the electronic component (0014). 11: Y teaches that the electronic component comprises an antenna (0014). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GRAHAM P SMITH whose telephone number is (571)270-1568. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10am - 6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dameon Levi can be reached at 571-272-2105. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GRAHAM P SMITH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2845
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 30, 2024
Application Filed
May 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12640479
ANTENNA AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
1y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12627080
CONNECTION SYSTEM FOR USE WITH AN ANTENNA BOX
2y 6m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12620711
ANTENNA MODULE
1y 7m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12614834
ANTENNA STRUCTURE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 11m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12609459
Waveguide Antenna
2y 10m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+12.6%)
2y 8m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 695 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month