Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 17, 2026
Application No. 18/862,987

ION SOURCE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 05, 2024
Priority
May 12, 2022 — EU 22172991.6 +1 more
Examiner
VANORE, DAVID A
Art Unit
2881
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Enpulsion GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
1128 granted / 1269 resolved
+20.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1287
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
16.4%
-23.6% vs TC avg
§103
11.3%
-28.7% vs TC avg
§102
30.4%
-9.6% vs TC avg
§112
33.5%
-6.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1269 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 11/5/24; 12/4/24; 12/12/25 have been considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 6, 8, and 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being clearly anticipated by WO 2019/113617. Regarding claim 1, ‘617 discloses an ion source (Abstract) comprising a reservoir (2) for a propellant, a heater (An inherent feature since the propellant metals, cesium, indium, gallium require liquification to flow and become liquid), an emitter (4) in fluid communication with the reservoir, an extractor accelerating emitted ions (5, in Fig. 2A), and at least one baffle (20) arranged upstream an emitter between the reservoir and the emitter. Regarding claim 6, ‘617 discloses baffles 20 and shown in Fig. 4 are mounted on an annular wall surrounding an emitter channel and are mounted on spaced pins as illustrated in Fig. 4. Regarding claim 8, ‘617 discloses that the baffles are mounted in a channel between the emitter and reservoir, the baffles protruding into the channel. Note page 18 of ‘617. Regarding claim 10, the channel in ‘617 is depicted as circular, note the central wettable feed tube (21). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-5, 7, and 9 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claims 2-3, the annular arrangement of baffles 20 in the prior art cannot produce a “meandering stream” since they are symmetrically distributed about the flow axis as shown. Regarding claim 4, the baffles in the prior art are not a frustrum, but are uniform fins. Regarding claim 5, ‘617 has disclosed baffles 20 are not taught to be a cage but rather linear fins. Regarding claim 7, ‘617 does not teach or suggest at least one baffle mounted on a rod extending from an emitter towards a reservoir. Regarding claim 9, ‘617 does not teach a tapered a channel which tapers towards an emitter but does disclose a uniform diameter central wettable tube 21. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID A VANORE whose telephone number is (571)272-2483. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday 7AM to 6 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Georgia EPPS can be reached at (571) 272-2328. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. DAVID A. VANORE Primary Examiner Art Unit 2881 /DAVID A VANORE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2878
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 05, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12731775
METHOD OF OPTIMIZING GEOMETRIC AND ELECTROSTATIC PARAMETERS OF AN ELECTROSTATIC LINEAR ION TRAP (ELIT)
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12730127
ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPE (AFM) DEVICE AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE SAME
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12725755
SAMPLE PIECE RELOCATING DEVICE
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12721579
BREAST AXILLA AND THYROID RADIATION SHIELDING DEVICE FOR MEDICAL PERSONNEL
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12725757
SUPPORT STRUCTURE OF INVERTED LAMELLA FOR TALL ROI
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+7.5%)
1y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1269 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month