Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/864,261

FILTER MODULE AND ANTENNA MODULE INCLUDING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Nov 08, 2024
Priority
May 11, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0057776 +2 more
Examiner
LEE, WILSON
Art Unit
2844
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
LG Innotek Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
570 granted / 657 resolved
+18.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
678
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.5%
-29.5% vs TC avg
§103
52.3%
+12.3% vs TC avg
§102
20.5%
-19.5% vs TC avg
§112
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 657 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Remarks Applicants elect Group I (Claims 16-30) without traverse. Claim Rejections – 35 U.S.C. 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Cooper et al (2023/0084310). Regarding Claim 16, Cooper et al (2023/0084310) discloses a filter module (filter circuitry, paragraph [0046]), comprising: a first ground layer (L3, GND, see upside down fig. 12); a second ground layer (L1, GND, fig. 12) disposed so as to be spaced apart from the first ground layer; a first conductive pattern layer (L2, SIG, fig. 12) disposed between the first ground layer (L3, GND) and the second ground layer (L1, GND); a second conductive pattern layer (L4, SIG) disposed on one side of the first ground layer (L3) or the second ground layer; and a via interconnecting (see the dotted line goes through all layers) at least two of the first ground layer (L3), the second ground layer (L1), the first conductive pattern layer (L2), and the second conductive pattern layer (L4). PNG media_image1.png 459 448 media_image1.png Greyscale Claim Rejections – 35 U.S.C. 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 17-19, 30 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cooper et al (2023/0084310). Regarding Claim 17, Cooper does not explicitly disclose the filter module according to claim 16, wherein the first conductive pattern layer includes a capacitance pattern formed to have a capacitance while facing at least one of the first ground layer or the second ground layer. However, Cooper discloses the filter circuitry comprising capacitors and inductors and resistors (paragraph [0051], L2 (as first conductive pattern layer) and L4 (as second conductive pattern layer) are signal layers (paragraph [0125]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have composed or printed the filter circuitry on L2 in order to filter the signal that is received at the signal layer. Regarding Claim 18, Cooper discloses the filter module according to claim 17, wherein the first conductive pattern layer includes a first inductance pattern formed to have an inductance (paragraph [0051]). Regarding Claim 19, Cooper does not explicitly disclose the filter module according to claim 17, wherein the second conductive pattern layer includes a second inductance pattern formed to have an inductance. However, Cooper discloses the filter circuitry comprising capacitors and inductors and resistors (paragraph [0051], L2 (as first conductive pattern layer) and L4 (as second conductive pattern layer) are signal layers (paragraph [0125]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have composed or printed the filter circuitry on L2 in order to filter the signal that is received at the signal layer. Regarding Claim 30, Cooper discloses a filter module (filter circuitry, paragraph [0046]), comprising: a second ground layer (L1, GND, fig. 12); a first conductive pattern layer (L2, SIG) stacked on the second ground layer (L1, GND), the first conductive pattern layer (L2, SIG); a first ground layer (L3) stacked on the first conductive pattern layer (L2); a second conductive pattern layer (L4) stacked on the first ground layer (L3), the second conductive pattern layer (L4) including a transmission line (L1-L3 may form the RF transmission line paths, paragraph [0126]) the first conductive pattern layer (L2) and the second conductive pattern layer (L4) in a vertical direction. Cooper does not explicitly disclose the pattern layers implementing an inductor and a capacitor. However, Cooper discloses the filter circuitry comprising capacitors and inductors and resistors (paragraph [0051], L2 (as first conductive pattern layer) and L4 (as second conductive pattern layer) are signal layers (paragraph [0125]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have composed or printed the filter circuitry on L2 in order to filter the signal that is received at the signal layer. Allowable subject matter Claims 20-29 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Correspondence Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Examiner Wilson Lee whose telephone number is (571) 272-1824. Proposed amendment and interview agenda can be submitted to Examiner’s direct fax at (571) 273-1824. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, examiner’s supervisor, Alexander Taningco can be reached at (571) 272-8048. Papers related to the application may be submitted by facsimile transmission. Any transmission not to be considered an official response must be clearly marked "DRAFT". The official fax number is (571) 273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Center. Status information for published applications may be obtained from Patent Center. For more information about the Patent Center, see https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Patent Center, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /WILSON LEE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2845
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 08, 2024
Application Filed
May 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12627018
Rat-race balun and associated method for reducing the footprint of a rat-race balun
2y 4m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12614851
DISPLAY MODULE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 7m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12614860
FREIGHT CONTAINER SIDE-MOUNTED ANTENNA
1y 6m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12603258
PLASMA PROCESSING APPARATUS AND PLASMA PROCESSING METHOD
2y 12m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12586891
ANTENNA DEVICE
1y 7m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+3.1%)
2y 9m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 657 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month