Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/865,195

METHOD AND DEVICE FOR STORING MOTION VECTOR FOR INTRA PREDICTION BLOCK

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Nov 12, 2024
Priority
May 13, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0058737 +2 more
Examiner
FEREJA, SAMUEL D
Art Unit
2487
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Digitalinsights Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
477 granted / 635 resolved
+17.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
696
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
87.7%
+47.7% vs TC avg
§102
6.8%
-33.2% vs TC avg
§112
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 635 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of the Claims Currently, claims 1-17 are pending in the application. Claims 1-17 are amended. Response to Arguments / Amendments Rejections under 35 U.S.C. §101: In the light of amendment to claim 17, the examiner withdraws the previously made rejection under 35 U.S.C. §101. Rejections under 35 U.S.C. §112: In the light of amendment to claim 17, the examiner withdraws the previously made rejection under 35 U.S.C. §112. Rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103: Applicant’s arguments have been fully considered but are rendered moot in view of the new ground of rejection necessitated by amendments initiated by the applicant. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2, 11 & 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a) (1) as being anticipated by PALURI et al. (US 20210021834, hereinafter PALURI) Regarding Claim 1, PALURI discloses a method of reconstructing a current block, performed by a video decoding device, the method comprising: acquiring reconstructed pictures and a vector field from a buffer ([0071] FIG. 2, predictor 230 derives a prediction sample for a current block based on a sample specified in a reference picture according to a motion vector using one of the skip mode, the merge mode and the MVP (Motion vector Prediction) mode); generating a prediction block of the current block based on intra prediction using reconstructed neighboring samples ([0077] a motion vector predictor candidate list may be generated using a motion vector of a reconstructed spatial neighboring block and/or a motion vector corresponding to a Col block which is a temporal neighboring block when the MVP (Motion vector Prediction) mode is applied -i.e. the motion vector of the reconstructed spatial neighboring block and/or the motion vector corresponding to the Col block which is the temporal neighboring block may be used as motion vector candidates; [0092] FIG. 4, decode motion vector and update a motion vector field (MVF) of each coding unit or prediction unit storing a motion vector, a reference index, list information, prediction mode information in the MVF); and storing vector information corresponding to a position of the current block in the vector field based on a prediction mode according to the intra prediction ([0077] predictor 230 selects a prediction motion vector of the current block from the motion vector candidates included in the motion vector candidate list using the motion vector index and acquires a motion vector included in the information about prediction and derive the motion vector of the current block by adding the motion vector difference to the motion vector predictor; [0092] FIG. 4, decode motion vector and update a motion vector field (MVF) of each coding unit or prediction unit storing a motion vector, a reference index, list information, prediction mode information in the MVF). Regarding Claim 2, PALURI discloses the method of claim 1, PALURI discloses dividing a current coding block region corresponding to the current block into grids of the ([0092] FIG. 4, decode motion vector and update a motion vector field (MVF) of each coding unit or prediction unit storing a motion vector, a reference index, list information, prediction mode information in the MVF). Regarding Claim 11, Encoding method claim 11 of using the corresponding decoding method claimed in claims 1, and the rejections of which are incorporated herein for the same reasons as used above. Regarding Claim 17, Computer-readable encoding method claim 11 of using the corresponding decoding method claimed in claims 1, and the rejections of which are incorporated herein for the same reasons as used above. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-10 & 12-16 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claims, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Samuel D Fereja whose telephone number is (469)295-9243. The examiner can normally be reached 8AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, DAVID CZEKAJ can be reached at (571) 272-7327. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SAMUEL D FEREJA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2487
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 12, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Apr 13, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 22, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12682661
SENSOR CALIBRATION USING FIDUCIAL MARKERS FOR IN-CABIN MONITORING SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12684124
QUANTIZATION MATRIX PREDICTION FOR VIDEO ENCODING AND DECODING
1y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12670623
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATIC CAMERA CALIBRATION
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12666019
CROSS-COMPONENT ADAPTIVE LOOP FILTER FOR CHROMA
1y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12666020
CROSS-COMPONENT ADAPTIVE LOOP FILTER FOR CHROMA
1y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+11.5%)
2y 7m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 635 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month